Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

You say you want a revolushioohoon ...

Options
  • 11-09-2009 11:12am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭


    ...well here's an idea on how to possibly get one:

    The Lisbon vote.
    It's pretty clear that if it was a "no" vote again, Cowen and the governement would be finished ...mmmh, nice

    It's also pretty clear that if it is a "no" vote again that the country will be marginalised within the EU and basically f0cked ...mmmh, not nice.

    OK ..so convinced "no" voters will vote no anyway, but lots of potential yes voters are torn. They want to do the right thing for future of the country but don't want to give the current governement their seal of approval by proxy ...what are they supposed to do?

    Well ...here's the deal:

    If every "yes" voter votes "yes" but also alters their voting card by adding a hand written comment like "Cowen out" or "governement out" the governement will be in a right connundrum.
    They might well get enough "yes" votes to carry the referendum ...but most of those Yes votes will be regarded as spoilt (because of the comment) and can't be counted.

    So the tally will read someting like 40% "no" votes ...perfectly valid ones, perhaps another 10% perfectly valid "yes" votes and 50% spoilt "yes" votes.

    Now I reckon that with 50% of the votes spoilt there surely is a way to nullify the referendum and just run it again ....after the governement has stepped down.


    We win !


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,883 ✭✭✭wudangclan


    'peasants revolt?'


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭enda1


    Votes are not counted as spoilt yes or spoilt no, just spoilt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    enda1 wrote: »
    Votes are not counted as spoilt yes or spoilt no, just spoilt.

    You can be quite sure that if it turns out that all the spoilt ones read "yes" as well, that someone will take note and jot down the numbers :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭phasers


    That wouldn'tt work


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,168 ✭✭✭Neamhshuntasach


    You'd be better off just walking up to Brian Cowan and digging the fook outta him to be honest. The fists are mightier than the spoilt vote.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,743 ✭✭✭funk-you


    How about bombarding every FF member with letters, emails, phone calls etc.

    I'll vote YES if you leave office

    Also let all the newspapers, radio/TV stations etc. know about it?

    -Funk


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    funk-you wrote: »
    How about bombarding every FF member with letters, emails, phone calls etc.

    I'll vote YES if you leave office

    Also let all the newspapers, radio/TV stations etc. know about it?

    -Funk

    Not a bad idea and perhaps a bit less risky than the spoilt vote.


    Coming to think of it ...a great idea actually. All we need is a critical mass of letter writers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 280 ✭✭Ziggurat


    Every time I see this suggestion I lose a little more faith in the Irish public.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭Euro_Kraut


    Would should vote YES to Lisbon. Its gives the EU are greater role in our government thus reducing the impact of Cowen and Co.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,946 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    tbh nice would have passed if there was another way for people to show their opinion of the government.

    they should add another question to the ballot, do you like us ? or something

    then people could vote on the issue , not on the popularity of that bunch of overpaid wasters


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,068 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Who'll replace the government if there was a revolt? Imagine the cost of holding a general election on such terms.. and with everything else that's going on atm


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,091 ✭✭✭Antar Bolaeisk


    This is an absolutley fantastic idea, not only would it effectively screw Ireland's future involvement with Europe (maybe the effects won't be immediately noticeable or even particularly tangible but Europe will not look favourably on Ireland irregardless of the reasons, perceived or apparent, for voting no) but we could also provide instability in the country at a time when we need stability. Sure I don't agree with how the government is managing this situation, they're weak, making all the wrong decisions for all the wrong reasons and prolong everything to the point where we're sick of hearing about it and afraid of what's coming down the line.

    Voting No to Lisbon should only be done if you feel it is the right thing to do, not to spite the Government and possibly ruin future relations with Europe.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,946 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    what is the cost of an election ?

    bear in mind we are paying €400 million EXTRA in interest per year because of the worsening of our credit rating. That's more than a million a day on Nothing !


    How much will NAMA cost over what it needs to ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,003 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    You'd be better off just walking up to Brian Cowan and digging the fook outta him to be honest. The fists are mightier than the spoilt vote.

    Judging by the state of his face now, it looks like he's been used as a punch-bag already, so further violence wouldn't make him change his attitude.

    A 200 foot bungee jump using a 300 foot bungee cord is the only answer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,589 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    Voting No to Lisbon should only be done if you feel it is the right thing to do, not to spite the Government and possibly ruin future relations with Europe.
    Exactly. No doubt, however, you'll have plenty of ill informed goons opting for the spite vote.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭Captain Furball


    peasant wrote: »
    ...well here's an idea on how to possibly get one:

    The Lisbon vote.
    It's pretty clear that if it was a "no" vote again, Cowen and the governement would be finished ...mmmh, nice

    It's also pretty clear that if it is a "no" vote again that the country will be marginalised within the EU and basically f0cked ...mmmh, not nice.

    OK ..so convinced "no" voters will vote no anyway, but lots of potential yes voters are torn. They want to do the right thing for future of the country but don't want to give the current governement their seal of approval by proxy ...what are they supposed to do?

    Well ...here's the deal:

    If every "yes" voter votes "yes" but also alters their voting card by adding a hand written comment like "Cowen out" or "governement out" the governement will be in a right connundrum.
    They might well get enough "yes" votes to carry the referendum ...but most of those Yes votes will be regarded as spoilt (because of the comment) and can't be counted.

    So the tally will read someting like 40% "no" votes ...perfectly valid ones, perhaps another 10% perfectly valid "yes" votes and 50% spoilt "yes" votes.

    Now I reckon that with 50% of the votes spoilt there surely is a way to nullify the referendum and just run it again ....after the governement has stepped down.


    We win !

    Vote no because they're going anyway soon enough.I've great confidence in irish people..............


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭Prof.Badass


    I came in here expecting talk of a revolutioin.

    Instead i got a mod telling me to vote yes to lisbon.

    :rolleyes:


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,718 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    I thought the figures were more like 400 billion a year?

    In any event, Euro Kraut is right. If we ratify the Lisbon referendum, the EU might be able to help us out of our current predicament. That said, it's pretty clear that one way or another, there should be a general election before the end of the current government's term in office. We just need a few Greens/Independents to man up to tilt the balance against Cowen's government.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,068 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It'll cost alot more than usual if it was forced. What would any new government do that's different? Are there any viable alternatives to NAMA?

    Everyone likes a rant but nobody bothers with trying to come up with ideas to actually change where Ireland is headed.

    It's like replacing a manager of a shit football team.. the team will still be shit afterwards, and the new manager will be blamed again

    Best way to bring about a revolution is by national strikes, but nobody wants that either

    I say we become a socialist country and close our borders.. then give people a year to decide whether they want to be here or not.*

    *not really, but it's as productive an idea as any other, when it's posted on a forum and no real action taken


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,091 ✭✭✭Antar Bolaeisk


    I say we become a socialist country and close our borders.. then give people a year to decide whether they want to be here or not.


    I vote for a dictator. We just need to get rid of him/her before they start showing any genocidal tendancies.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,193 ✭✭✭Turd Ferguson


    funk-you wrote: »
    How about bombarding every FF member with letters, emails, phone calls etc.

    I'll vote YES if you leave office

    Also let all the newspapers, radio/TV stations etc. know about it?

    -Funk

    That won't work because FF members and politicians in general don't give a flying fuck what happens to this county. They would rather a No vote and for them to keep their jobs than a Yes vote and them out of it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    If we ratify the Lisbon referendum, the EU might be able to help us out of our current predicament. That said, it's pretty clear that one way or another, there should be a general election before the end of the current government's term in office.

    It's just that ratification of the Lisbon treaty becomes so much more probable/realistic if a "no" vote can't be seen as a protest against the current governement.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,003 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    People can vote no, if they feel the need, as long as it's not to spite Cowen. This would be crazy, given that most of the other party leaders are giving the same "vote yes" advice that he is.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    NO... ON.... 24..... NO... ON.... 24


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,718 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    Unfortunately, there's no way for the population to force a general election. Even a no vote for Lisbon would not necessarily mean a general election, and frankly, such a tack is far too risky for the future of Ireland in Europe that I cannot stress how much I disagree with it. I'm not overly pleased with the Lisbon treaty and what it does for our voice in Europe, but if that's the price we have to pay as a nation to keep afloat, I'm more than willing.

    We can be very clever or very silly here. It would be clever to vote yes to Lisbon and to organise visits en masse to constituency offices of elected TDs letting them know that if they don't vote against the current government in the Dáil, their seat's gone and their career's over. Obviously, that would take numbers. If sufficient numbers cannot be garnered, maybe the government's mandate could be reaffirmed and we might have to face that a silent majority are happy with them.

    A silly thing to do would be to vote no to Lisbon in a gamble to try to force a general election. If you're going to vote no, do it on the issues. If you're going to vote no on the issues, make sure you understand them.

    If you don't understand the issues, vote neither yes nor no.


    P.S. Minimum wage is never going to be €1.84 in this country unless deflation reaches Zimbabwean standards.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,589 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    P.S. Minimum wage is never going to be €1.84 in this country unless deflation reaches Zimbabwean standards.
    These loony bin assertions are coming from the shady Coir group. I would point people to this Tribune article to quash such rubbish.

    http://www.tribune.ie/news/article/2009/sep/06/the-coir-question-whos-lying-to-us/


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    A silly thing to do would be to vote no to Lisbon in a gamble to try to force a general election.

    actually ...the idea was to vote "Yes" for Lisbon but to spoil your vote.

    I'm imagining that faced with 60-80% of spoilt yes votes the EU would put on enough pressure behind the scenes to a) remove the governement and b) have another referendum asap to get the yes vote unspoilt this time round.

    The possibly fatal error of this idea of course lies in the percentages ...if only a few yes voters spoil their vote then the no campaign would win it ....you'd need (almost) everybody on the yes side to do it to have a chance of it succeeding and also convice the undecided ones to row in behind you.


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,718 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    peasant wrote: »
    actually ...the idea was to vote "Yes" for Lisbon but to spoil your vote.

    I'm imagining that faced with 60-80% of spoilt yes votes the EU would put on enough pressure behind the scenes to a) remove the governement and b) have another referendum asap to get the yes vote unspoilt this time round.

    The possibly fatal error of this idea of course lies in the percentages ...if only a few yes voters spoil their vote then the no campaign would win it ....you'd need (almost) everybody on the yes side to do it to have a chance of it succeeding and also convice the undecided ones to row in behind you.
    I understand the idea, but given that pollsters in this country are selected by Government appointees, the fact that so many yes votes were spoiled would probably go unnoticed unreported.

    Something worth looking into is spoiling no votes the way you suggest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,003 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    What about a "vote of no confidence in the government" website, with various security measures to prove the accuracy of the input?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    ejmaztec wrote: »
    What about a "vote of no confidence in the government" website, with various security measures to prove the accuracy of the input?

    not a bad idea


Advertisement