Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Article with Update on USA's Passport Rules

Options
  • 14-09-2003 7:44am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭


    Since articles from the NYTimes are accessible for about 2 weeks before they're archived at their pay-per-article database, I've pasted the entire item here.

    [If inappropriate moderator, then please delete.]

    From The New York Times online edition, September 8, 2003

    New Passport Rules Are Put Off by U.S.
    By PHILIP SHENON

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 8 — The Bush administration has decided to postpone enforcement of new antiterrorism regulations that had threatened to block millions of Western Europeans and citizens of other developed nations from traveling to the United States unless they obtained new, computer-coded passports, senior administration officials said today.

    They said the new passport rules, which were supposed to take effect on Oct. 1 and which were mandated by Congress as an antiterrorism measure, will not be enforced until October 2004.

    The rules will require that citizens of 27 countries who do not usually require visas to visit the United States — most of them in Western Europe, as well as Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and Brunei — carry passports with text that can be read by computerized scanners at airports and other American border stations.

    The rules, arising from the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, were intended to stop terrorists from trying to use false passports to enter the United States and make it easier for officials to gather information on people arriving here.

    Administration officials said the State Department decided to delay implementation of the rules by more than a year because of the chaos that could have resulted next month when travelers unaware of the new rules tried to enter the United State with old-style passports.

    In some Western European countries, including France and Spain, more than a third of all passports in circulation do not have so-called machine-readable features. The majority of passports from Switzerland are not machine-readable.

    Officials said the decision was communicated on Friday to American embassies representing the United States in 26 of the 27 countries, with the embassies instructed to inform the foreign governments that their citizens could be exempted from the new passport rules until October 2004 so long as the governments provide assurances that the machine-readable passports will readily available by then.

    The countries are being required to provide a written request to the State Department of their desire to have their citizens exempted from the new rules until next year.

    The rules are not being waived for Belgium, where the requirement for machine-readable passports is already being enforced because of concern about passport security there.

    American officials said the move to postpone enforcement of the rules followed a vigorous debate between the State Department, where senior officials felt that enforcement of the rules had to be delayed to avoid turmoil for foreign travelers, and the Department of Homeland Security, where officials believed that the new passport rules were a valuable antiterrorist tool and needed to be enforced as quickly as possible.

    The officials said the Department of Homeland Security agreed to the one-year waiver, but only after insisting that the foreign governments provide written assurances of their commitment to ending passport fraud and to introducing machine-readable passports.

    "I wouldn't characterize it as State Department versus Homeland Security, but it's been a subject of some discussion," a State Department official said.

    An official at the Department of Homeland Security said, "We're pleased to have reached an agreement on a policy that serves all needs, especially our needs in combatting terrorism."

    A copy of the cable sent by the State Department to the American embassies last week was provided to The New York Times.

    While the cable suggests that Secretary of State Colin L. Powell has not made a final decision to waive the Oct. 1 deadline for the new passports — it says only that Mr. Powell "is prepared to exercise his authority to grant a limited waiver" — administration officials said the decision had been made.

    The decision to delay enforcement of the new passport rules will be welcomed by the travel industry, which says it has been devastated by antiterrorism policies adopted by the Bush administration that have discouraged many foreign travelers from visiting the United States.

    People from countries that participate in the State Department's visa waiver program are allowed to travel to the United States for tourism or business for 90 days or less without obtaining a visa.

    In entering the visa waiver program, the countries are required to certify that they are committed to issuing only machine-readable passports.

    In several countries, including Australia, Britain and Japan, most passports in circulation are already machine-readable.

    American passports are also machine-readable, with passenger information encoded in two lines of text at the bottom of plastic-coated inner cover.

    The 27 countries in the visa-waiver program face another daunting deadline in October 2004, when they will be required by the United States to issue passports with computer chips containing facial recognition data.

    Travelers from those countries with passports issued before the October 2004 deadline will still be allowed to travel to the United States without visas as long as their governments have begun a so-called biometric identification program.

    Privacy advocates in the United States and overseas have expressed dismay at the demands being made by the administration over the immigration policies of some of its closest allies.

    #


Comments

  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 5,945 ✭✭✭BEAT


    Thanks Athena,
    I see you have changed your avatar again, your hair seems to change color quite often ;)


Advertisement