[Article]Ireland falls to 30 in WEF competitiveness rankings

Floater

Finland edges out US as world's most competitive nation

Source: Agence France-Presse

GENEVA -- Finland was ranked the most competitive country in the world by the World Economic Forum on Thursday, edging out the United States from the top spot in its annual survey thanks to a healthy Finnish economy, efficient public institutions and technology-driven industry.

The two countries have traditionally vied for the lead position in the WEF's three-year-old survey, one of two global rankings of competitiveness drawn up every year by Swiss-based private research institutes.

All the Nordic states were ranked within the top nine of the 102 countries surveyed and European countries generally improved their position in the main index after it was adjusted to take account of waste in government spending, according to the 2003 Global Competitiveness Survey.

Taiwan and Singapore were the highest-ranked Asian economies, in fifth and sixth place, respectively, while South Korea rose from 21st to 18th place and Japan (11th) climbed two slots.

"Korea's rise in the rankings was driven by improvements in its macroeconomic environment, increased public trust in politicians, a better score in the area of diversion of public funds and a remarkable improvement in its technology performance," the survey said.

China (44) fell nine places down the table because of "a remarkable deterioration in the perceived quality of public institutions", the survey added.

West European countries, including Germany (13), were largely stable or marked slight progress compared with last year.

But Ireland (30) fell in the index because of its ailing economy and Italy lagged far behind in 41st place due to "across the board" declines in economic performance, the perception of its public institutions and its technology base.

The survey praised eight eastern European countries due to join the European Union next year, led by Estonia (22), noting that some of them could join the top ranks of the most competitive economies "in the medium term".

"Quite aside from having benefited from reasonably competent macroeconomic management, as a group they have moved further along than virtually any set of economies in the world in implementing broad-ranging structural reforms," it added.

Chile (28) continued to be the most competitive Latin American nation in the WEF survey, but was criticized for government waste, "exhibiting the worst decline in the indicator measuring public trust of politicians".

Argentina (78) and Brazil (54) suffered from declines in their economic environment, but WEF highlighted the strength of their technology base and especially a surge in recruitment in the service industry in Brazil.

Botswana was the highest-ranked African country (38), but was handicapped by a low rating on the technology criteria.

Angola, Chad and Haiti were ranked least competitive."

http://www.weforum.org/gcr2003

Floater

BigEejit

here we go again .... Ireland lagging behind a former Eastern Bloc country and a South American country ..:rolleyes: ... wait for the spin doctors to come up with "they were using last years data, we would have been much higher if they used this years data"

Floater

Originally posted by BigEejit
here we go again .... Ireland lagging behind a former Eastern Bloc country and a South American country ..:rolleyes: ... wait for the spin doctors to come up with "they were using last years data, we would have been much higher if they used this years data"

There were no complaints when Ireland ranked 4th in 2000!

What went wrong since?

Floater

star gazer

The government have gotten it wrong. The value for money spent by this government went out the window. During the boom years the state coffers swelled and bottlenecks began to emerge in the economy. The government would be rigourously scrutinised had they raised taxes to get value for the money, but since the tax take increase was covered by cuts in the tax rates, there wasn't the public accountability. Bottlenecks have continued because there is great profit to be made in exploiting bottlenecks. The government didn't tackle the bottlenecks in anything close to a duty to the public good.