Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

AquaMark3

  • 19-01-2004 2:51pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭


    Just running AquaMark03 for the first time. Decided to try it out as alot of hardware site seem to be leaning towards it rather then 3dmark03.

    P4 3.06GHz
    Standard Dell motherboard
    Geforce FX5900xt 500/900
    7200rpm drive
    1024MB 333MHz DDR RAM
    533MHz Front-Side Bus

    Score:
    48,150

    http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1952353223

    Anyone else use this tool? If so whats ur scores ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,312 ✭✭✭mr_angry


    Yeah, AquaMark3 has less "application-specific optimizations" (or cheating to you and me) than 3D Mark, and so some people are leaning towards it. Its very GPU-oriented though. As far as I know, there should be a new version of 3DMark coming out soon, as they've finished and released PC Mark.

    Anyway, my system, my scores:
    P4 3.2GHz
    Standard Dell motherboard
    Radeon 9800 (overclocked to 411MHz core speed)
    7200rpm drive
    512MB 400MHz DDR RAM
    800MHz Front-Side Bus

    Score:
    46,700


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,313 ✭✭✭bus77


    Gave it a wack, and it wacked me back...


    P4 - 2.4 (533FSB)
    256MB - DDR 333/ 2700
    Radeon 9000pro 64mb
    Win98SE


    Score = 13,071:(


Advertisement