Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The reason Enterprise ratings are down.

1235»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    It wasent **** it was just very detailed, seaya all tomorrow


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭DMT


    Originally posted by User45701
    STAR WARS DOES NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO HAVING A ****ING WEEKNESSS IN A ****ING SHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Ripping off Star Wars is lame....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    HOW IS HAVING A WEEK POINT IN A SHIP RIPPING OFF STAR WARS!
    STAR WARS RIPED THAT OFF SOME BOOK OR OTHER MOVIE/TV SHOW!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭Woden


    end of the day lucas was inspired for his star wars ideas from star trek something which he openly admits to iirc,

    now there is a forum for the debating the strengths and weaknesses of the death star, we shall stay on topic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    Sry data.

    We kinda are ontopic we are talking about 318
    The large Xindi weapon with a week point
    He says its ripping off star wars, but just cause a ship has a week point does not mean that it rips off star wars


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭Woden


    no problem

    i agree just coz a ship has a weak point doesn't mean it is ripping of star wars, i'm sure that concept was used long before then and will continue to used many times in the future

    i'm sure if someone scours their memory they can think of an episode of TOS where they looked for the weak point in something to destory it, or what about that episode of DS9 when the valiant was looking for the weak point of the jem hadar ship.

    that concept is not a star wars original and as a result not a rip off

    data


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭bizmark


    Originally posted by Dataisgod
    no problem

    i agree just coz a ship has a weak point doesn't mean it is ripping of star wars, i'm sure that concept was used long before then and will continue to used many times in the future

    i'm sure if someone scours their memory they can think of an episode of TOS where they looked for the weak point in something to destory it, or what about that episode of DS9 when the valiant was looking for the weak point of the jem hadar ship.

    that concept is not a star wars original and as a result not a rip off

    data

    The planet eater in TOS which was made of neutronium comes to mind.In order to destroy it Kirk detonated the impulse engines of a Connie class ship inside the planet eater destroying the internal workings of the machine.

    1 64 megaton detonation destroying a planet destroyer made of neutronium.......im sure you could call that a major design weakness


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭Woden


    good man bizmark, that the ep in which there is captain decker the commander of another constitution class star ship? and is will deckers father from the motion picture?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭bizmark


    Ya Decker was the captain of USS Constellation which was used to destroy the planet eater his whole crew was killed by the planet eater when it destroyed a planet where they were hiding.

    And i don’t know if theirs a connection to the Decker from ST one :dunno:

    Oh ya and it was a 100 megaton donation not 64 :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭Woden


    aye think he's his father, uncle hang on i'll look it up

    aye he's the son of commodore matt decker that chap from the episode

    data


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    I didnt know he was the son of the comodore.
    Well anyway we only have to wait 4 weeks 6 days and then Sky1 will show 319 and Sky will be 3 days ahead of the US (just like with the 2nd half of SG1)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭bizmark


    Commodore Decker doesnt look old enough to have a son in command of a starship of the Connies importants tbh :confused:

    i though he was only like 30 by the looks of him........But its been years since i seen that film


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭DMT


    Originally posted by User45701
    HOW IS HAVING A WEEK POINT IN A SHIP RIPPING OFF STAR WARS!
    Take your head out of your arse.
    Break it down:

    Similarities between Death Star and Xindi:
    o Designed to destroy planets
    o "Weak point" is at the centre
    o One torpedo fired at "weak point"
    will destroy Death Star completely
    o Perilous journey must be taken to
    reach "weak point"
    o Both is under construction

    It's not just ripping off the "weak point", it ripping off the entire thing.
    From now on, I propose the Xindi weapon be called "The Xindi Death Star".
    Just goes to how lame Berman & Braga have become...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭DMT


    Originally posted by User45701
    Sky will be 3 days ahead of the US (just like with the 2nd half of SG1)
    That's fecked up...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭Woden


    Originally posted by DMT
    Take your head out of your arse.
    Break it down:


    Death Star: Xindi Weapon:

    Designed to destroy planets Designed to destroy planets

    "Weak point" is at the centre "Weak point" is at the centre

    One torpedo fired at "weak point" One torpedo fired at "weak point"
    will destroy Death Star completely will destroy Xindi Weapon completely

    Perilous journey must be taken to Perilous journey must be taken to
    reach "weak point" reach "weak point"

    Death Star is under construction Xindi Weapon is under construction


    It's not just ripping off the "weak point", it ripping off the entire thing.
    From now on, I propose the Xindi weapon be called "The Xindi Death Star".
    Just goes to how lame Berman & Braga have become...

    look folks i don't want to know this crap, i have no idea that the weak point for a xindi weapon is at the centre, or that a journey will have to be made to get to it or whatever, this stuff hasn't aired yet and i dont' want to know about it, if i wanted to see episodes of enterprise before they aired i'd have them through bit torrent but i don't i watch it on monday evening at 8pm on sky 1 along with a number of other people i presume that read this forum.

    so the next time some body puts info in with out spoiler tags i'll ban em for a week, the next person that does it two weeks the next a month etc. etc. also if your quoting some one that used spoiler tags ensure that there original quote is still hidden or don't quote it at all and if your response is in any way related to there hidden quote make sures yours also contains spoiler tags

    Regards

    Data


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    Originally posted by DMT
    Take your head out of your arse.
    Break it down:


    Death Star: Xindi Weapon:

    Designed to destroy planets 1Designed to destroy planets

    "Weak point" is at the centre 2"Weak point" is at the centre

    One torpedo fired at "weak point" 3One torpedo fired at "weak point"
    will destroy Death Star completely will destroy Xindi Weapon completely

    Perilous journey must be taken to 4Perilous journey must be taken to
    reach "weak point" reach "weak point"

    Death Star is under construction 5Xindi Weapon is under construction


    It's not just ripping off the "weak point", it ripping off the entire thing.
    From now on, I propose the Xindi weapon be called "The Xindi Death Star".
    Just goes to how lame Berman & Braga have become...

    OK i numberd your points
    1. Ok so anything that can destroy a planet is a copy of the death star? Moron

    2. Ye i know lets build a weapon where the power core it on the outside and unprotected - MORON!

    3.It wasent one torpedo it was deveral torps inside a ship to detonate at the same time (self destruct) That is different than SW, but emm ye Enterprise is about 1 ship to will we just make 50 ships sppear from the future to fight the Xindi?

    4.It wasent perilous it was a suicide mission

    5.Actually it is built. They where doing matence


    Also i reject your proposal on renaming the Xindi weapon to Xindi death star


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    Of what do you speak?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    Go on.
    Tell me another way to have a
    super weaon
    Originally posted by DMT
    Edit out the spoilers you quoted from my original post (which I've already spoiler-tagged)...

    Emm all my posts are spoilerd, They say 318


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭bizmark


    Theirs a difference between rip of and a "tip of the hat" to the death star ......Much like the Breen helmets are a tip of the hat to the bounty hunter in star wars

    But its true b and b has lost the polt when it comes to ship designs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭Woden


    subsequent posts quoting the originally non spoiler tagged information have been tagged

    Data


  • Advertisement
Advertisement