The Ultimate Question for Man.

sionnach

Originally posted by RobertFoster
they're both pretty annoying american teenagers tbh...

yeah, but they're hot.........

RobertFoster

Originally posted by sionnach
yeah, but they're hot.........

yeah, but what are the chances of anyone on this forum ever meeting them, let alone "getting" them.

Creamy Goodness

where's the vote option for both of them.

Barry Aldwell

If there was an option for both of them everyone would choose that one. Dur.

Pigman II

Originally posted by Agent Orange
Lads, in fairness, they look like a pair of 11 year olds

Well like they say, the only thing better than a 22 year old woman is two 11 year old girls.

RobertFoster

Originally posted by Kold

another pic... except i can't tell which is which...

does the one on the right remind anyone of Pamela Anderson?

whosurpaddy

Originally posted by blondie83
Apparently they were on a witness protection program, and had to be relocated to Australia for some reason.

is this the olsen's, or the kids you were babysitting?



after much deliberation im nearly certain that i pick ashley.

LoneGunM@n

I'd have to go with Ashley

Sarky

Who the hell are those freaks?

Dustaz

Originally posted by RobertFoster
yeah, but what are the chances of anyone on this forum ever meeting them, let alone "getting" them.

YOU ARE HERE

---

> *

































The Point *

hedgetrimmer

Anyone else disturbed by the fact that 90 people answered this poll....


:dunno:

The_B_Man

i dont think most people would be put off by the fact that they're not legal yet, i think what would put me off is the fact they only look 12! i wouldnt go near them to be honest.
also, we never see them on TV as 17 year olds. any TV programme with them in it is old and they'd be 15/16 max in them.

quick google search:
http://www.chasebrown.com/olson.htm

http://stabme.f2o.org/services/olsens/

and
http://www.smlinks.com/sotw/why/image010.jpg

tman

Originally posted by The_B_Man
i dont think most people would be put off by the fact that they're not legal yet, i think what would put me off is the fact they only look 12! i wouldnt go near them to be honest.

erm, 17 is legal... they're nearly a year in surplus now.

and tbh, if you can't find a 34 year old, 2 17 year olds will do

Sefrian

Omg ne1 who doesnt think there HoT.... How strange are you? But its grnad for me im 17 neway ....... I like ashley but i wouldnt say no to mary kate

spoofilyj

The next time any of you leave your computer in to be repaired, I'd advise you to remember two words: Gary Glitter.

LOL
Anyway i would pick ashley...
But thats besides the point! There is way too many people interested in this thread for this to be a healthy activity myself included???
They are hot though!!!
on second thoughts i'd take both together....
Now i feel like Quagmire from family guy...
Alright!

vibe666

shame on all of you.

I still think they are secret clones of Pamela Anderson.

Me still thinks that it won't have stoppped Playboy from saving up their budget for the last 5 years waiting for them to be old enough to ask.

it's still very dodgy territory though since they have been famous since they were about 5 in the USA. even now they still look like children, definately not a healthy obsession IMHO for anyone who isn't still a teenager.

Kobie

Hmmm. Wonder if there's any sound scientific explanation for the fact that for a pair of identicle(ish) twins that 82% of the learned panel have the overwelming desire to bone Ashley?

woosaysdan

wheres the option for both? i want both of them

Civilian_Target

Originally posted by Mordeth
they were hotter 5 years ago

Is your real name Peter??

(Brasseye is hilarious)

Kold

Brasseye = w1n

ven0m

Dunno why ppl are whinging, they're both 17 i.e. of legal age...

& in answer to the poll - they're so small why can't I have both???? hehehehehehe

:: THE SILVER SURFER ::

Agent7249

Ashley. And is there any pictures with them in comparison to someone else rather than with just the two of them at the same time

rymus

I'll say I want option 4; both of them in a sex sandwich. However I request that my response to this thread be put on hiatus until such time as they are over the age of consent.

that is all.

embee

Arent they just lovely........

Twin sisters kissing.

You have to pay money for that in some places.

rymus

yes... that'll do it...




/me goes off to change his pants.

Deadwing

one word:
Jl-b8

whosurpaddy

marvels at the fact that after 4 pages and 70 odd replies it took a girl to post a picuture of them kissing.

ive new found repect for embee

rymus

bring on the slydiceage!

*delves into the depths of the google image search*

Davey Devil

Eh, I no which one I'm not picking, eat some food girl.

http://members.boards.ie/daveydevil/olsentwins4.jpg

Souless

i would have to say ashly suppose but both would be nice

tba

I read somewhere that they werent actually genetically identical twins, but were actually just very similar paternal twins.

//edit I read it here for a start, then here

The_B_Man

it sez in that link that they are "Strawberry Blonde"!! duz that mean they
are ginger? ive had bad experiences with gingers.

i hereby change my vote to "NONE of the above".:eek:

Blisterman

They're 2 days older then me, so it's ok for me to vote on it. even though I'm 4 days to young to vote in the next election.

smoke.me.a.kipper

Ashley. no wait. Mary-Kate. no wait. Ashley. no wait. Mary-Kate. no wait.... oh no, now ive gone cross eyed.