Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sar levels...The facts

Options
  • 24-05-2004 5:28pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7


    Manufacturer , Model, SAR (W/kg) Digital


    Ascom Axento 1.25
    Benefon Twin Dual 1.01
    Bosch M-Com 906 1.32
    Bosch World-718 0.33
    Bosch GSM-908 1.59 HIGH!
    Bosch GSM-909 1.13
    Ericsson S828 0.77
    Ericsson A1018s 0.88
    Ericsson GH628 0.26
    Ericsson GH688 0.95
    Ericsson A2618s 0.79
    Ericsson A1228D 1.35
    Ericsson LX-588 1.51 HIGH
    Ericsson SH688 0.91
    Ericsson SH888 0.42
    Ericsson R310s 0.94
    Ericsson R320s 0.94
    Ericsson i888 World 0.69
    Ericsson T18s 0.61
    Ericsson T28s 1.49
    Ericsson T28 World GSM 1.49
    Hagenuk Global 0.28
    Mitsubishi Trium Aria 0.48
    Motorola Startac 130-fixed antenna 0.38
    Motorola 130 Startac 0.10
    Motorola StarTac 70 0.02 LOW
    Motorola d160 0.81
    Motorola cd930 0.7
    Motorola V3688 0.02 LOW!
    Motorola Timeport L7089 1.0
    Motorola T2288 0.54
    Motorola P7389 1.0
    Motorola Timeport 9250 1.0
    Motorola 1611 1.06
    NEC DB4000 1.23
    Nokia 2110 0.44
    Nokia 3110 1.24
    Nokia 3210 1.14
    Nokia 3310 0.75
    Nokia 6110 0.87
    Nokia 6150 0.69
    Nokia 6210 1.19
    Nokia 7110 0.76
    Nokia 8110i 0.73
    Nokia 8210 0.72
    Nokia 8890 0.53
    Nokia 8850 0.22
    Nokia 8810 0.22
    Panasonic EB-G250 0.95
    Panasonic EB-GD92 1.07
    Panasonic EB-G500 0.98
    Philips Diga 1.06
    Philips Savy 1.11
    Philips Genie 1.05
    Philips Genie 1800 1.26
    Philips Genie 1800-fixed antenna 1.41
    Philips Genie 900 1.52
    Plantronics Headset m-120 0
    Plantronics Headset m-140 0
    Samsung SGH 2400 1.17
    Siemens C25 0.72
    Siemens M35i 1.14
    Siemens C35i 1.19
    Siemens S35i 0.99
    Sharp TQ G700 1.01
    Sony CMDX-1000 0.41
    Sony CMD-C1 0.55
    Sony CMD-Z5 1.06


    What is SAR?
    SAR stands for Specific Absorption Rate which is the unit of measurement for the amount of RF energy absorbed by the body when using a mobile phone. Although the SAR is determined at the highest certified power level in laboratory conditions, the actual SAR level of the phone while operating can be well below this value. This is because the phone is designed to use the minimum power required to reach the network. Therefore, the closer you are to a base station, the more likely it is that the actual SAR level will be lower.

    Information on Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) values
    To communicate with the network, mobile phones emit low levels of radio waves (also known as radiofrequency or ‘RF’ energy) when being used. Governments around the world have adopted comprehensive international safety guidelines, developed by independent scientific organizations, governing the exposure to RF energy. Mobile phones are designed to operate within these stringent limits.

    Does a lower SAR mean that a phone is safer?
    No. Variations in SAR do not mean that there are variations in safety. While there may be differences in SAR levelss among phone models, all mobile phones must meet RF exposure guidelines.

    What is the status of the reporting program?
    Click below to view SAR information for models tested against the international guidelines (ICNIRP).
    http://www.mmfai.org/files/files/health_indx.htm

    What information is available for consumers?
    Download a consumer brochure on SAR below
    http://www.mmfai.org/files/files/health/MMF_SARflyer.pdf


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,212 ✭✭✭✭Tom Dunne


    WTF?

    Did I miss something? :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,441 ✭✭✭✭jesus_thats_gre


    Shame they are old facts!!

    Nokia 2110 0.44
    Nokia 3110 1.24
    Nokia 3210 1.14
    Nokia 3310 0.75
    Nokia 6110 0.87
    Nokia 6150 0.69
    Nokia 6210 1.19
    Nokia 7110 0.76
    Nokia 8110i 0.73
    Nokia 8210 0.72
    Nokia 8890 0.53
    Nokia 8850 0.22
    Nokia 8810 0.22

    How many of these are still sold?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 gsm solutions


    In the past I have refrained from posting SAR levels. Most of the named handsets are not on the market anymore. Every mobile phone on the market today emits uncontrolled radiation in a isotropic fashion, studies are currently been carried out on new handsets, results will be posted when complete.

    However, to your liking we are currently updating our database and verifying all the newly submitted SAR levels. This is a time consuming process, as the manufactures still do not have this information easily available for consumers. Once the SAR data is added into our new php interface you will able to search lowest to highest.

    On to SAR again, it’s a marketing SCAM! Have you every see the way sar test are done, there is NO standards in the tests themselves! Different labs use different tests rigs, different size ears, and position the phone at different angles,

    So even if you can get over the fact that the regulating test are not regulated, just stick to the FACTS! The hazards to RF Radiation occur at THOUSANDS OF TIMES less RF exposure than from even the lowest recorded SAR Level. Why than is SAR not a valid test, it affects cell and genetic processes at NON-THERMAL LEVELS.

    That being said and knowing it to be true, we can not participate in defrauding the public with bureaucratic lies to protect an industry and government completely out of control.

    Until safer mobile phones are on the market we recommend NEVER putting any cell phone against your body without shielding having a shield between you and the phone! That leaves only one truly RF Safe option and that’s exactly what we offer the public in our RFS Gold Package. 1 - Air tube headset 1- wire guard 1- pocket shield.

    PS. you should also keep in mind that digital cell phones use a pulsed signal, stroboscopic for better a term. This is the jackhammer of RF Waves with much greater potential to disturb biological systems!


Advertisement