Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

We did it !!! Now Let's Build On the Success

Options
  • 14-06-2004 3:04am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32


    In a fantastic show of racial and national solidarity, Irish people overwhelmingly voted to restrict the citizenship "rights" of non-Europeans.

    The "Yes" vote in the constitutional amendment referendum added up to 79.14% of the electorate, an amazing win considering that supposed "Irish nationalists" such as Sinn Fein, national pressure organizations, and even the hierarchy of the powerful Catholic Church (which urged "tolerance" while wisely stopping short of openly pushing a "No" vote) were opposing the amendment.

    The figures are interesting: while in mixed-race areas such as Dun Laoghaire (Dublin's port, with a fairly large non-White population) were "only" 70% in favor, all-White areas such as Longford and Meath were in the 83%-84% range. This is the inverse of such voting patterns in the United Kingdom and USA, where high concentrations of non-Whites tends to lead to greater pro-White sentiment.

    In the Proposition 187 anti-Mestizo campaigns in California, rich, White areas such as Marin and Sonoma had some of the largest pro-Mestizo sentiment. This is due to two things: regional anti-worker capitalist agribusiness dependence on illegal Mestizo stoop labor, with these corporations funding anti-187 propaganda, and the "liberal," leftist politics of wealthy, self-hating Whites able to afford to live in splendid isolation.

    The Irish figures show that racially, ethnically and religiously homogeneous communities retain a sense of self-awareness that is able to react decisively in their own interests, while dissipated, besieged White communities are not -- whether the dissipation is the result of non-White influxes or socio-economic selfishness. This is why International Zionism and its Globalist, capitalist allies are so intent on deracinating White nations as swiftly as possible.

    Interestingly, while the Irish people rejected Sinn Fein's insane demands for autogenocide, they voted heavily for Sinn Fein in local and European elections! This is because SF pose as "Euroskeptics" against the European Union while the Fianna government -- which sponsored the highly successful "Yes"-vote in the referendum, is pro-EU.

    What this tells White nationalists is that the people of Ireland are highly intelligent, with little misplaced "loyalty" to any one political party. What the nation needs now is a new generation of White nationalists willing to fill the vacuum the Old Parties represent: a non-sectarian organic organization that embraces the Protestants of Ulster and is willing to put the issue of RACE first on the Irish agenda.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Consider this post reported.

    Mike.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    If you'd read the rules, Sean1916, you'd know that it's rather frowned upon to just cut and paste an article by someone else without giving your opinion on it.

    The fact that the article itself is rather laughable with that nice racist (help, I'm White with a capital W) overtone to it makes me think that you may not see this until you take your sheet off but I'm hopeful of something resembling an opinion from you in any case.


    International Zionism ate my hamster.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭swiss


    Ignoring the decidedly racist tone of this thread, there is another discussion thread on the front page discussing the yes result in the referendum.

    I'm tempted to ask the original poster several questions. For example, by "building on the success" of this result, does he envisage a final solution? Should we identify asylum seekers by - I don't know - putting a star on their arms or something?

    But I won't. Because he won't be able to answer here. Thread locked.

    PS I don't like racism and I'll tackle it anywhere I see it. I voted yes to this referendum and I'm frankly disgusted that certain sections of society would use it as a springboard for overtly racist policies.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement