Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Were al-Jazeera banned so the US could "deal with" Najaf unhindered

Options
  • 12-08-2004 1:47pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭


    Read this article from the Guardian yesterday and it struck a cord. http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1280442,00.html

    If the US are getting ready to storm one of the Holiest Muslim sites in the world it would be preferable for them if most of the Muslim world didn't see them do it.

    Its nice to see the US backed adminsitration deliver the freedoms that Bush and Blair harp on about all the time.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭gerkiely


    As opposed to the freedom they enjoyed under the rule of Saddam Hussein.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Well Bush and Blair are using these "freedoms" as the excuse for going to war now that the WMD one has disappeared into the sand.

    Well they have followed Saddam's lead and reinstituted the death penalty. Heres another article from yesterdays Guardian that sums it all up quite well. http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1280443,00.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭sovtek


    gerkiely wrote:
    As opposed to the freedom they enjoyed under the rule of Saddam Hussein.

    SO this is the new justification for this **** up that is Iraq.... "He's better than Saddam"??!!???
    (nevermind that all evidence so far suggests the contrary)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,478 ✭✭✭magick


    doesnt make a difference anyway because im sure quiet a few of fighters in Najaf are going to be making "jihad" videos to broadcast on the internet ,which in turn will be shown by Al-Jazzera


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 576 ✭✭✭chill


    gandalf wrote:
    Read this article from the Guardian yesterday and it struck a cord. http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1280442,00.html

    If the US are getting ready to storm one of the Holiest Muslim sites in the world it would be preferable for them if most of the Muslim world didn't see them do it.

    Its nice to see the US backed adminsitration deliver the freedoms that Bush and Blair harp on about all the time.

    Al Jazeera should never have been allowed in there in the first place. It is an anti western, anti american, anti freedom supporter of terrorism and of the Islamic/Arab dictatorship elite in the middle east.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭BuffyBot


    Al Jazeera should never have been allowed in there in the first place. It is an anti western, anti american, anti freedom supporter of terrorism and of the Islamic/Arab dictatorship elite in the middle east.

    Definitely. They also eat babies and perform satanic rituals on screen. How much exposure have you actually had to Al-Jazeera?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭dathi1


    Al Jazeera should never have been allowed in there in the first place. It is an anti western, anti american, anti freedom supporter of terrorism and of the Islamic/Arab dictatorship elite in the middle east.
    hehe :D he must be taking the piss. This is the same network that Sadam closed down before the war. They are well known for their criticisms of Arab dictators and cronies. Arafat in Palestine, Mubarak in Egypt, Assad in Syria have all been the focus of Aljeezera. The Algerian government has also recently banned them for showing up discrepancies in their system of government. I reckon the defeat of the Bush doctrine at Fallujah and Aljeezera combined could be one of the pivotal moving points for democracy in the middle east.
    on another note: I just installed a digital satellite receiver and have both Aljezz and Al Arabia..great footage but haven't a clue what they're saying.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    gerkiely wrote:
    As opposed to the freedom they enjoyed under the rule of Saddam Hussein.

    Who AJ? They were banned in Iraq during Saddams time.

    If your that upset, why aren't you giving out about the fact that the US are employing Saddams cronies to help run the government?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 576 ✭✭✭chill


    BuffyBot wrote:
    Definitely. They also eat babies and perform satanic rituals on screen. How much exposure have you actually had to Al-Jazeera?

    Exactly ! Far too much !


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    Hobbes wrote:
    Who AJ? They were banned in Iraq during Saddams time.
    I assumed that was the point ger was making.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement