Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Maybe invite Fintan O'Toole to the EGM?

Options
  • 31-08-2004 5:09pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 805 ✭✭✭


    Well, at least one more media pundit gets it (from today's Irish Times):

    Let the subscriber beware

    Fintan O'Toole


    Last week, Eircom announced proudly that it has 73,000 customers for its broadband services and expects to have 100,000 by the end of the year.

    I assume that I form a part of one or other of these figures, since I am undoubtedly on Eircom's books as a broadband subscriber. I have in fact subscribed three times. I have been sold the service by cold-calling salespeople and by door-to-door marketing.

    I am a classic target. I live within three miles of Dublin city centre and I work from home. My work involves extensive use of e-mail and the Internet. The only problem is that I have repeatedly failed to get broadband installed.

    I first subscribed over a year ago. All my details were taken. I was told that the service was available in my area. And then nothing whatsoever happened. Eventually when I made enquiries, I was told that there was no record of my having subscribed.

    The whole rigmarole started again. This time I got a date for installation. A few days before the date, Eircom called to say that my area was in fact not eligible for broadband. Why? "Either because you're too far from an exchange or because the quality of the line is too poor." Which was it? "Um, we don't know."

    I was just getting my head around the idea that the inner suburbs of Dublin are too remote for broadband when a nice woman from Eircom called to the door.

    Had I ever thought of getting broadband? I told her that I had indeed but explained that she was wasting her time here because the area had been declared technically out-of-bounds. She informed me that, on the contrary, the area was being specifically targeted by the company because it was suitable for broadband.

    So I subscribed again, filled out the forms and waited for the call. When it came, I made the appointment, changed my plans so I could be there at the right time and waited. No one came.

    When I rang to find out what was going on, no one in the phone company could tell me why a phone call to say they weren't coming was beyond their capacity. I was assured, however, that someone would call the next morning to explain what had happened and set another appointment.

    That was a month ago, and I've still heard nothing. Anecdotal evidence suggests that my experience is fairly typical. It is immensely difficult, in the so-called free market, to buy this particular service.

    The point of all of this, beyond the pleasures of whingeing about yet another dismal experience of customer service in Ireland, is that broadband is supposedly a major national priority. The Government has a special website extolling the virtues of this new technology and urging citizens to embrace its advantages.

    It has been official policy since the Information Society Action Plan in the late 1990s to ensure that Ireland is in the top 10 per cent of OECD countries for broadband connectivity by 2005. We're supposed to have 8 per cent of homes connected by the end of this year, and 100 per cent of schools and libraries connected by next year.

    Yet even while the State was setting out these goals as vital to Ireland's position as a global centre for high-tech industry, it was also flogging off the only vehicle it had for achieving them: Eircom.

    The idea, of course, was that a privatised company would be more efficient, more market-driven, more responsive to consumer demand. What's actually happened is a shining example of the ideological delusions that bedevil the privatisation of public utilities. Eircom, in its various manifestations, has given us a lesson in what works and what doesn't.

    When the phone service was a monopoly run directly by the civil service, it was a sluggish, demoralised operation with no interest in customer demands. For nearly two decades, when it was a commercial State company with a decent level of investment, it actually achieved an important national goal, establishing a telecommunication system that enabled economic and social development. Now, as a private company with its eye always on the short-term fluctuations of the stock market, it's as bad, from the point-of-view of customer service, as it was in the 1970s.

    One of the reasons for this is surely that, in its fixation on short-term profits, the stock market likes job losses. By the end of this year, Eircom will employ over 1,000 fewer people than it did last year, and this kind of cost reduction undoubtedly boosts the share price. But it also leads to a worse service for customers.

    The lean, stripped-down company makes sense in the private sector where the only motive is profit. When other motives - such as the meeting of important public policy goals - are in play, the calculations have to be more complicated.

    It makes no sense, from a public point-of-view, to have a national airline that doesn't carry cargo or a national phone company that can't deliver a broadband service to households.

    Yet with Aer Lingus being prepared for privatisation and Eircom already without a public remit, that's what we are getting.

    And if you want public policy that's more than airy aspirations, just hang on the line for 20 minutes, press star, tear your hair out, press hash and we'll get back to you.



    © The Irish Times


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    Beautiful,just beautiful. The pen and the Press are mightier than the sword. "Fintan for President" of IOFFL ?.. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,659 ✭✭✭✭dahamsta


    vinnyfitz wrote:
    Eircom called to say that my area was in fact not eligible for broadband. Why? "Either because you're too far from an exchange or because the quality of the line is too poor." Which was it? "Um, we don't know."
    Wouldn't swear to it because I haven't discussed the intracacies of the testing system with anyone for quite some time, but I'm pretty sure this is a lie.
    The Government has a special website extolling the virtues of this new technology and urging citizens to embrace its advantages.
    Special indeed. So special that the registration system doesn't actually work, yet Gov.ie refuses to put up a notice to that effect on the front page, as requested by our own Damien Mulley.

    Under "special" in Gov.ie's dictionary, it says "see false hope".

    adam


  • Registered Users Posts: 638 ✭✭✭Mr_Man


    I'd suggest it would be worth writing to the Times and following up on Fintan's article with more insight into what an average punter has to put up with when trying to get BB. Some of the BB Horror Stories might be worth pointing to. A comparison with some other countries would also reinforce the points made in the aritcle to-day.

    M.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭damien


    dahamsta wrote:
    registration system doesn't actually work, yet Gov.ie refuses to put up a notice to that effect on the front page, as requested by our own Damien Mulley.

    Been talking to the sys-admin again. They hope to have the issues sorted this week. The contact email address on the site is now working and the prices and availability will be updated probably this week too.

    As usual with me I had another few dozen questions too about the site and they are going to try and provide me answers to these in time, and I'll post them here.

    This was a good article by Fintan O'Toole by the way. We'll try and make contact.


  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭jwt


    Sounds like a plan, but remember there is going to be a lot of arguing/discussion about the disbanding motion and the future of IOFFL

    John


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 805 ✭✭✭vinnyfitz


    A letter published in yesterday's (Thurs Sept 9) Times rekindles interest in the article above.

    Anybody fancy replying to Dr Skelton?

    ACCESS TO BROADBAND

    Madam, - I was intrigued by Fintan O'Toole's column of August 31st in which he wrote about the long wait he has had to endure to get connected to Eircom's broadband product. Still he waits, according to the piece. He writes: "It is immensely difficult, in the so-called free market, to buy this particular service".

    That may be true in the case of a monopoly, but hadn't Mr O'Toole realised that there is choice in broadband provision in this country, with a range of other providers offering alternatives to Eircom? Indeed, your paper recently carried a very useful feature on the current broadband providers ("A little research of broadband services can go a long way" (August 8th). - Yours, etc.,

    Dr RUSSELL SKELTON, Wheaton Hall, Drogheda, Co Louth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    I wonder if Fintan could ritually toast a colleagues scrotum for me........very slowly and at medium high temperatures . This colleague is notorious for peddling press releases as journalism.

    M


Advertisement