Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

U.S Presidential Elections - Dare to call it?

Options
1235»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭omnicorp


    em, it turns out "Land of the Free" America isn't really a democracy.
    oh, and I think a Bush up the ass would serve Those gun-totting Americans right.
    Tell them that the world is not their plaything.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭MeatProduct


    Kerry has it cause he has the more royal blood and for some strage reason that seems to count in US presidential elections!

    Nick


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,316 ✭✭✭OfflerCrocGod


    I don't care. It wont make a difference the US is still going to screw the rest of the world and it will still be able to do what it wants when it wants. At least Bush doesn't try to hide that fact, Kerry will smile and wave while he's doing it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,417 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    It wont make a difference the US is still going to screw the rest of the world and
    The difference is Kerry will kiss you when he is screwing you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    omnicorp wrote:
    em, it turns out "Land of the Free" America isn't really a democracy.

    By any reason-based standard which says that the US isn't really a democracy, you should logically end up concluding that there are no democracies on earth.

    Whats your point?

    jc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭omnicorp


    Al Gore got 51% of the vote, Bush got 46% (Nader and other small canditates got the other 3%).
    Yet, legally Bush won thanks to the Electoral College system whereby the State gets different amounts of votes depending on the Population, BUT it also gets a vote for each senator it has.
    So, it is possible to win an election legally without getting most votes.

    Hence, no democracy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    omnicorp wrote:
    Al Gore got 51% of the vote
    No he didn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭omnicorp


    He got more than Bush.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    omnicorp wrote:
    He got more than Bush.
    Yes he did


    On the main topic, I'm finding it very hard to call in advance (understandably, lots of other people see themselves in the same boat). I reckon Kerry will take it but I've no idea on margin.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭omnicorp


    I think Bush will get it, I don't want him to get it, but people don't know Kerry's name which tends to be a bit of a draw back when push-comes-to-shove at a polling station.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,316 ✭✭✭OfflerCrocGod


    omnicorp wrote:
    He got more than Bush.
    I read that as "He got more Bush" :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭omnicorp


    oh so funny(!) No, what I'm getting at is America is prancoing and nancing around the world "spreading democracy" whaen they eren't really a democracy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    omnicorp wrote:
    So, it is possible to win an election legally without getting most votes.

    Hence, no democracy.

    Ah, now I see. YOu believe that anything which doesn't have a "one man one vote" system isn't democratic.

    I take it you also accept that the EU isn't democratic either?

    jc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭omnicorp


    yeah, I believe that any system whereby the majority of people vote one way and wins is a democracy.
    Any system whereby a candidate can get most votes and LOSE is not a democracy.
    If someone could explain how it is, please tell me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭steviec


    omnicorp wrote:
    yeah, I believe that any system whereby the majority of people vote one way and wins is a democracy.
    Any system whereby a candidate can get most votes and LOSE is not a democracy.
    If someone could explain how it is, please tell me.

    It's the system USA has had in place since it was founded and 2000 was not the first time the man with less total votes won. Winning a few states by a landslide and losing the rest by a small margin might get you the popular vote but won't win the election. This year could actually go the opposite way, with Bush winning the popular vote and Kerry being elected. And you won't get the same people calling Kerry an illegitimate president.

    Whether or not its an ideal system is debatable but most countries are similar and everyone knows the rules before the election and candidates campaign accordingly, if the popular vote counted there'd be less concentrating on swing states and votes would go differently, so it can't really be blamed for giving 'wrong' election results.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭FatherTed


    omnicorp wrote:
    yeah, I believe that any system whereby the majority of people vote one way and wins is a democracy.
    Any system whereby a candidate can get most votes and LOSE is not a democracy.
    If someone could explain how it is, please tell me.

    Isnt is also possible for a party in Ireland get 51% of the votes cast in the country and still lose the election? So, by your theory Ireland is not a democracy too?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,872 ✭✭✭segadreamcast


    Indeed, it also went that way in 1882 (?)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,872 ✭✭✭segadreamcast


    omnicorp wrote:
    I don't want him to get it, but people don't know Kerry's name

    Oh come on now - what the heck is that? People know Hitler's name, they certainly aren't going to vote for him...

    On another note your argument lacks logic - you actually presume that the vast majority of Americans are ignorant and totally oblivious to the second party in this election?!?

    Madness.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 92 ✭✭In_Diana_Jones


    NoelRock wrote:
    Oh come on now - what the heck is that? People know Hitler's name, they certainly aren't going to vote for him...

    On another note your argument lacks logic - you actually presume that the vast majority of Americans are ignorant and totally oblivious to the second party in this election?!?

    Madness.

    Please be Bush...please!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 92 ✭✭In_Diana_Jones


    kerry... for the same reason...

    I have this funny feeling in the back of my mind though that bush will win somehow... friends in high places like the last time around may come to the rescue.. democracy my arse!!!

    Bush I hope.

    what's undemocratic about it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 92 ✭✭In_Diana_Jones


    gandalf wrote:
    Unfortunately at this moment I think Bush will win it and that outcome makes me sick to my stomach!

    Bush for President.
    The lesser of two idiots!


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,417 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    omnicorp wrote:
    I think Bush will get it, I don't want him to get it, but people don't know Kerry's name which tends to be a bit of a draw back when push-comes-to-shove at a polling station.
    He just has to introduce himself as "JFK". Oh, the irony that JFK I sent* JFK II to Vietnam and JFK I got shot in Dallas.

    * You know what I mean.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭omnicorp


    Dear God, we're ruined, another four years, get out those Nuclear bomb shelters, I have a feeling that the market for them will rise.
    Well, we lasted four years, maybe we'll last another four, we just have to be string.


Advertisement