Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

US Presidential Election

Options
1235

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    Um... What the hell has your being anti-choice got to do with anything regarding the war?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,738 ✭✭✭Barry Aldwell


    Kerry
    Um... What the hell has your being anti-choice got to do with anything regarding the war?
    I dunno what he's trying to do, but there will probably be a lot of people shouting at him pretty soon (you know the type, "I repect everyone's opinions, as long as they are the same as mine"). Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go hide behind a rock before the flaming starts


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    I don't think it will. It's just too goddamn irrelevat to flame! I was going to and then I realised, it's like attacking a paper bag floating around the place! What are you doing? You can't flame it because it's just random nonsense! It just really has nothing to do with anything!

    I mean seriously, "I am a very bad person and I do it on purpose".
    WTF?!
    And this guy is talking about being anti-abortion?!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,738 ✭✭✭Barry Aldwell


    Kerry
    Like I said:
    (you know the type, "I repect everyone's opinions, as long as they are the same as mine")


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    I suspect jack may have been trolling....

    Move over there Barry, that rocks big enough to protect both of us


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    The scary thing is he seems to mean what he says. :confused:

    Aonghus, if you're hiding behind the rock with Barry, and I can't figure out how to flame him, then chances are nobody's going to do anything. Nobody else flames people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,196 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    time for an opinion that will piss a lot (and i mean a LOT) of people off: here it goes:

    9/11 was NOT the be all and end all of terror attacks. roughly 3000 died. there are two reasons the American public (as opposed to the government) reacted like they did:

    1)America had NEVER before had to deal with a foreign terrorist attack on its home soil. EVER. at least that i've been able to come up with. If anyone mentions oklahoma i hit you in the head but i can bet someone (looking at Forde) will say something stupid like that.

    2)9/11 was a ****ing media circus. its impact wasnt that 3000 people died, its impact was that people were sitting at home as the second plane crashed into tower 2 and saw it live - it was fed over every station and fed on peoples emotions - fed on fear and hatred and bush allowed them an outlet for it.

    as for how this election affects us - oil would be one - the second main point that would affect us is how much our neutrality changes over the course of bush'es second term in office - will we drift further towards our "american allies" til we're no longer neutral at all?

    and finally - Forde do you simply live inside your head where its all full of magical happy bunnies and stuff? just asking...


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    Exactly. And it was the first time the American public ever had to wake up and realise, "wait, this can happen to us too", as opposed to their earlier indifference and their attitude of, "terror and slaughter don't affect us, only bad countries". Though having seen the outcome in the slaughter of thousands more innocents in the cause of the "War on Terror" I don't know if I can say it's a good thing. I liked the Americans better when they weren't trying to kill everything that they didn't like.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Kerry
    But ideas like cancelling third world debt, are good ideas.

    Cancelling third world debt will do nothing. What happens when the country continues buying arms for war and stuff? If the debt is gonna be cancelled new governments will have to be installed and whatnot


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    And we saw just how well that worked in Iraq. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 104 ✭✭abraham lincoln


    ah, the United States of America! We invented democracy!
    Come to america to esceape persecutions in europe! Be they religious, ethnic or other wise. (but remember to be truely free in this country you have to be white, christian and rich!)
    This is the land of equality! Every man is equal (though we didn't outlaw slavery till 87 years after the founding of our great country and coloured people were not considered equal or have the right to vote up on till 35 years ago)
    This is the land of the free! You can practise what you want(thats why gay marriages are soon to be illeagal)
    In this country everyone has a vote( but a Presidential candidate can be elected to the white house without haveing the popular vote)
    We are the self proclaimed leaders of the free world. it is our self proclaimed duty to preach and enforce democracy on the rest of the world (we see no similarities between what we're doing in the middle east now and what the russians did in eastern europe after world war two which we denounced and nearly went to war over)
    America the land of the free (but also arrogance, ignorance and naivety)


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    Don't forget hypocrisy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Kerry
    And we saw just how well that worked in Iraq. :rolleyes:

    what im sayin is ya cant just cancel third world debt, walk away and expect it to develop into a prosperous country. Do i have to spell it out for ya?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    Yes you can you idiot. THe problem is that all those 3rd world countries are ignoring their own needs and economies to produce cash crops, in order to repay their debts. Remove the debts, and they can focus on improving their economy

    Take a simple example. Aaron wants to go and get a degree as a mature student. But unfortunatly, he owes Bill a lot of money. So Aaron has to get a job at minimum wage for Chris, and give all his income to Bill. This means that Aaron cannot go back to college, ans improve is life

    Was that simple enough, or do you require hand-puppets


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Kerry
    take a country like zimbabwe as an exampl. with a corrupt government, all the high up boys in it are stinkin rich from corruption, the government is paying for wars and the like, they ran all the white ppl and gave their land to unskilled black ppl who cant run a farm. Now take away their debt, the boys at the top arent gonna give up their lavish lifestyles, the farmers are gonna destroy the land and reduce the crop output, and straight away we're back to square one, with the countries borrowing to give their people emergency food.

    Do ya know how many countries in africa are fighting wars against rebels and tribes and the like? the governments are funding and feeding armies and not taking care of their citizens. Organisations like trocaire and goal etc are the only thing keeping a lot of ppl alive.

    So actually raphael thats TOO simple a view to have, as it isnt all black and white as take away the countries debt and everything will work out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    ColHol wrote:
    the farmers are gonna destroy the land and reduce the crop output
    Hence utterly destroying their own livelihood. At the moment they would destroy crops as protest because they're growing coffee etc, which they don't need. If they were growing food, they wouldn't destroy it, as that would be stupid
    ColHol wrote:
    Do ya know how many countries in africa are fighting wars against rebels and tribes and the like?

    Do you know why their rebelling? Because they don't have food and they're being forced to grow crops to sell. That's the root of the problem
    ColHol wrote:
    Organisations like trocaire and goal etc are the only thing keeping a lot of ppl alive.

    I know. Because their governments aren't. Why? Because they don't have the money
    ColHol wrote:
    So actually raphael thats TOO simple a view to have, as it isnt all black and white as take away the countries debt and everything will work out.

    Yes, but shades of grey are merely combinations of black and white, and hence can be reduced backwards to the root of the problem. Obscenely large national debts in this case


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Kerry
    Before now zimbabwe was mismanaging money, they were making a surplus and exportin food, which was mismanaged by the dodgy governments, squandered. Now take away the debt and walk away, theres still a dodgy government. Your jus giving them more money to throw away. Cancelling the debt may be a significant step in turning the fortunes of a country around, but it has to be part of a wider programme to rid the country of corruption and war and whatnot. Dont you agree?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    No. corruption is human nature, it exists in our coutry as well. The fact remains that we put them into this sceanario, so we should free them from it by forgiving the debt. We have to give them a chance, they never had one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Kerry
    im all for giving them a chance, i never actually said i was against cancelling the debt. Most of these countries are under the same leadership that ran up all this debt, so why forget all about it and let them create another mess that they must be bailed out of? why give them a second chance in the hope that theyll change? most of these guys arent exactly fretting about their millions of starving while theyre lining their pockets. why not make it a bit less risky and install a reliable government, or put in place a program to prevent the same mistakes being repeated? I just think its too easy an option to cancel the debt and HOPE for the best


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 104 ✭✭abraham lincoln


    thread name to be changed to Raphael verses Colhol third world debate...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Kerry
    haha, feel free to contribute......









    (as long as ya agree with me)


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    I think possibly the problem with this debate here, that I see, is that they're arguing about slightly different things.
    Just because the government is screwing a country it doesn't mean that everyone else should go "oh, look that government is bad. ergo that country and everyone in it is bad and we hate them, so we'll just let them be in serious debt".
    I mean, can they not just realise that these countries need help, and there's an opportunity to help without actually KILLING anyone, which is rather nice. But I suppose there's no country in the world that'd turn down money which they feel is theirs, even if the person owing it them really can't pay it...
    They should give them a chance at least...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    Holligan, The problem isn't debts that leaders ran up, that isn't the issue. No one is saying we should bail those governments out

    The problem is that we went in to these countries, took over their land, then sold it back to them. THAT'S the debts they have to pay off


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 104 ✭✭abraham lincoln


    ColHol wrote:
    they ran all the white ppl and gave their land to unskilled black ppl who cant run a farm.

    ok, that is whats called revenge, colm. for a few hundred years of having to pay rent on land that, by right, should be theirs but was taken from them by europians who were slightly more advanced then they were during or after the age of exploiration. we did it to the english, well tried to quite often but failed equaly as often.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,440 ✭✭✭✭Piste


    Raphael wrote:
    The problem is that we went in to these countries, took over their land, then sold it back to them. THAT'S the debts they have to pay off

    We?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,440 ✭✭✭✭Piste


    taken from them by europians who were slightly more advanced then they were during or after the age of exploration.

    Slightly?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    First world countries I would assume.

    By the way, anyone want to give me free good rep? I want another little green dot. Only need 60. I'll return the favour to anyone who does.

    Oh yeah, rep prostitution. ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    First world countries I would assume.

    By the way, anyone want to give me free good rep? I want another little green dot. Only need 60. I'll return the favour to anyone who does.

    Oh yeah, rep prostitution. ;)

    there ya go.... :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Kerry
    hold on a sec, this is gettin way outta hand here. If you'd all stop pickin out little points of my arguments and see the bigger picture im trying to say. Basically what im saying is im all for helpin out these countries. I just dont think cancelling the debt alone will solve anything.

    Now if the debt was cancelled, proper structure was put in place to ensure the extra money was well spent and NOT pumped into wars and whatnot, basically if the whole thing was managed properly then happy days, whether it means a new government or a commitment from the existing government. Im not convinced of wiping out the debt and leaving the country to its own devices. For one the banks are gonna want reassurance that this loss their making is gonna be worthwhile

    I cant wait for all the abuse thats gonna flood in...........


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    Thankee Aoibheann. Aonghus, damn you!


    *Make it 61*


Advertisement