Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Who is better- Oasis or Blur?

Options
  • 08-11-2004 8:48pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2


    Who is better in your opinion- Oasis or Blur? Excuse me for using a line from Father Ted... Blur are better in my opinion but what do you think? Answer me ANSWER ME!!


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭secret_squirrel


    What decade are you living in???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,911 ✭✭✭Zombienosh


    its only a bleedin whistle


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,005 ✭✭✭Creature


    They're both good.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 Coumtay


    Oasis! , no, Blur! , no Oasis!......which one do you like??


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Howard the Duck


    pfft the correct answer is Pulp of course :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 453 ✭✭dead air


    blur are a great band... at least they're progressive and not afraid to do something completely different. their last few albums have just gotten better and better. Oasis aren't too bad... they're just not as spectacular for a band with a profile as big as theirs should be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 275 ✭✭butterfly


    they're both very good, and very different. and yeah, blur have progressed, lots, and have gotten totally more growth out of their music than oasis.. way back when i really would've hands down said oasis, because blur were too.. annoying some of the time (sounds like i'm saying the gallaghers aren't annoying, dunnit?) but now i'd say blur have a better sound..
    if we're to be judging them overall though, i don't really know..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 154 ✭✭The Weatherman


    Blur ARE better.
    Oasis WERE better.

    -Blur did have a Graham Coxon afterall, there's only one of them in the world as we speak!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,638 ✭✭✭bombidol


    blur


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 454 ✭✭bandit


    Oasis for nostalgia reasons but Blur probably are..


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 207 ✭✭Grim_Reaper


    Blur are better... in fact anything is better than Oasis... even, dare I say it... Britney Spears is better than Oasis!!! Anywho... Hey Weatherman! Long time you no around!


  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭legofsalmon


    oh blur definately. Reminds me of those old school gangs we used to have, the blur gang and the oasis gang. Oasis guys were ****, just drawling trying to be like a gallagher could never make out a word they were saying.

    Pulp and Supergrass are good too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,287 ✭✭✭thedrowner


    blur
    for such songs as end of the century, this is a low, the universal, tender, girls and boys, etc etc etc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,105 ✭✭✭Tyrrial


    Another Pulp nomination from me anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28 catgirl


    Blur ARE better.
    Oasis WERE better.

    i agree, at the time i liked oasis, can't stand them now. blur 've lasted the test of time.

    put down the fork...... (love that episode)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 168 ✭✭miss serena


    Defo, Blur stand the test of time. Oasis just makes me cringe, more 'cos of the gallagher bros than the music really!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20 stereo_carol


    Heyyyy!!!!
    Oasis all the way! i mean blur are pretty decent and there's some new version of common people which is class but oasis are just classic!
    i mean take songs like live forever or little by little, brilliant...! :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,048 ✭✭✭DerekD Goldfish


    Pulp


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18 cawo


    oh dear lord it's ten years ago.... i've got to warn the world about simon cowell!!!

    they both suck ass..so does ian brown i might add


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,059 ✭✭✭memaeve


    Not a huge fan of either, but I'd go with Blur.
    xm


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 58 ✭✭dentaku


    blur are better selon moi, BUT oasis would have been better if it wasn't for liam gallagher. they're pretty dull now but early oasis (live forever, whatever, cast no shadow...) is still great.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 279 ✭✭sodiumlightbaby


    Oasis are dirt...always have been, always will be....producing student disco anthems for thickos who follow the crowd instead of trying to discover their own musical identity

    Blur write clever interesting, witty and intelligent music for people who understand that there's more to it than just "following the herd, down to Greece"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 471 ✭✭tovalee


    blur, i liked that gorillaz cd too, a bit out there, but interesting anyway. :cool:


  • Registered Users Posts: 701 ✭✭✭sickle


    Blur are waaay better.
    they shouldn't really be compared with oasis...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭metalish


    Blur are a good band and there still going with their crazy videos and so forth. Oasis were a good band but to much drugs and girlfriends and big ego's got in the way and dont forget bout thier always being drunk


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 267 ✭✭EdBanger


    Heyyyy!!!!
    Oasis all the way! i mean blur are pretty decent and there's some new version of common people which is class but oasis are just classic!
    i mean take songs like live forever or little by little, brilliant...! :rolleyes:


    Er Common People? I think u Meen Pulp, and the new version is by Wiliam Shattner with a little help from benfold


Advertisement