Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Best and worst facelifts

Options
  • 11-11-2005 4:10pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,393 ✭✭✭


    IMO when car makers facelift a car they usually make a dogs dinner of it. Facelifts are meant to make a car look fresher and better but they usually make it look worse. Anyone want to name examples of cars that were spoiled or at least disimproved by facelifts. I think the facelifted Renault Laguna falls into this category.

    Some cars get very subtle facelifts eg the BMW E36 got one involving the front indicators and grille and only an anorak would notice it.

    One significant facelift that did improve a car IMO was the last Ford Escort which was actually facelifted twice. The original car was plain, the first facelift was disgusting and the 2nd facelift was a significant improvement.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭bennyc


    was it the 2000 facelift to the vectra that ended costing 200 jobs in GM in England as it was such a poor/lazy attempt


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,861 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    The bad:

    The 98/99 Corolla with the "bug" headlights :(

    The newer Civics (newer Prelude's as well) - toned them wayy down :(

    New Colts.. ditto

    New Avensis, New Primera (though I do kinda like it for some reason) .. in fact what is it with car manufacturers in the last few years and the need to build these big bulky looking saloon cars??


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I think the E39 5 series facelift was quite good as the new angel eyes were quite original.
    However, I can't think of any drastic facelifts but I didn't like the facelifted bug eyes on the Impreza.
    Whilst not a facelift as such, I think the E46 to E90 3 series changes were terrible


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    Impreza pre-01 ('classic') to post-01 ('bug eyes').

    W-O-R-S-T-E-V-E-R facelift.

    Latest ('02, was it? well, *very* shortly after :D ) redeems the situation somewhat, but still a long way to recapture the minds like the Mk.2 ('97, or was it '98?) did.

    A good recent one is the new MX-5. Sort of a half-way between the original and the very-limited production run of that V8 BMW roadster (the one in the Bond movie). Me likes, much more than the '98-to-'04 version (non-pop-up headlights).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    May I mention the Multipla? :)

    Fresh and funky, then dull and conservative.

    Mike.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    ambro25 wrote:
    A good recent one is the new MX-5. Sort of a half-way between the original and the very-limited production run of that V8 BMW roadster (the one in the Bond movie). Me likes, much more than the '98-to-'04 version (non-pop-up headlights).
    eh?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭el tel


    All those Lamborghini and Ferrari facelifts that ditched the pop-up lights for clear coverings in anticipation of a pop-up ban in the USA...

    (but kudos to Kersh and his new car: the late mode Diablos use the same headlamp units as the Nissan 300ZX)


  • Registered Users Posts: 498 ✭✭bmoferrall


    I think most people would agree that the Alfa 166 facelift was an improvement.

    Before:
    alfa_romeo_166_800.jpg

    After:
    alt01.jpg

    To be honest, it would have been harder to make the original worse!


    I reckon Alfa spoilt the original 156 with the same new face.
    What was discreet and proportionate became fussy and over-prominent.

    Before:
    12.jpg

    After:
    156alfa2.JPG


    All academic now, of course.
    The 166 has been put down and the 156 will shortly cede the limelight to the 159.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    kbannon wrote:
    eh?

    New MX-5:

    Exterior_1_2s.jpg

    BMW Z8:

    Z8.jpg

    Original MX-5:

    397809366658.jpg

    I did say a 'cross' (betweent the original and the z8), not 'exactly like' :rolleyes: But you'd really need to see one in the flesh... erm... metal, to get my point, I think (saw two in UK last week).


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,376 ✭✭✭Squirrel


    I preferred the,original 166, the front flowed more smoothly into the back. The new Laguna is a step backwards. Also, I preferred the original Focus (the one with the indicators on the bumper), to the face-lifted version (aroud 01/02 I think), don't know why


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    @ ambro - I understand what you mean now - I thought you were thinking they were from the same manufacturer.

    The Z8 in fairness is a good remake of the old 507
    BMW507.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,956 ✭✭✭layke


    A lot of cars have turned to muck in the most recent models.

    The classic MR2 is now a nice sporty hairdressers car imo... The civic is great for the family and personally I think the round eyes on the Subaru are mingin.

    Mistubishi have kept their cars looking mean which is what I like and god help me I do have a soft sport for the latest EVO.

    Overall were getting closer to that rounder futuristic look, you know where we all will eventually whiz around in bubbles.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭knifey_spoonie


    Some have mistaken facelift for new model, or so me thinks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,660 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Blah, I reckon they change them alot of the time just for the sake of changing them.

    I think VW and Ford are good with facelifts.
    i.e.

    Update to Passat around 2000 --> Sorted out the ugly front
    Passat in 1995 --> The pre facelifted car looked awful though (not referring to new model in 1996)
    Audi A4 in 1998/9 --> Small things like door handles and boot, but made a big improvment IMO
    The Skoda Felicia was a nice improvment over the Favorit too.

    Mondeo update around 2003 --> Just made the car look sharper and nicer
    Mondeo update in 1997 --> Made a bland looking car far more interesting
    Scorpio towards the end of its life --> Couldnt make it worse anyway I guess
    Fiesta in 1996 and in 2000ish. --> Made the ugly 1988 body nice looking
    Escort as already noted

    (NB. The "new" focus doesnt follow this trend)

    Its true about the round futuristic look. Buy yer Volvo 740s while you can :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,243 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Ford gave the plain but not ugly 1987 - 1994 Granada a major rework and turned it into the ugly Scorpio in 1995.

    The Hyundai Coupe facelifted in 2000 with the twin front lights was horrible.

    The 2001 Scooby with the bug eyes, improved in 2003 and now getting another facelift in January.

    The Rover 25/45 or MG ZR/ZS had more facelifts than Cher but the last one in 2004 was horrible imo and made a 10 year old design look 20 years old.

    Agree with views on the current Laguna, the facelift has done nothing for it except maybe show that the design is showing it's age.

    The Honda NSX originally had pop up lights until around 2001 when they got rid of them, totally ruinned the front of the car.

    I think the current Audi A4 facelift is not brilliant either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,310 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    bazz26 wrote:
    The Hyundai Coupe facelifted in 2000 with the twin front lights was horrible.

    The problem wasn't necessarily with the twin front lights but the fact that they kept the old indicator lights which had two corners and a curved edge, fine when the corners were butted up against the corners of the old headlight. It just doesn't work when they're out on their own beside twin round lights.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,059 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    old 147 (YEAY)

    johnmoloney147Red717.jpg

    New facelift (BOO)

    airton595.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,243 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    alias no.9 wrote:
    The problem wasn't necessarily with the twin front lights but the fact that they kept the old indicator lights which had two corners and a curved edge, fine when the corners were butted up against the corners of the old headlight. It just doesn't work when they're out on their own beside twin round lights.

    Yes, the front just looked over complicated and fussy.

    The original 1997 coupe was apparently designed by a well known designer but the 2000 facelift was done inhouse by Hyundai. It figures..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 293 ✭✭Lump Basher


    kbannon wrote:
    eh?
    Eh - just read his post - it makes perfect sense.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 548 ✭✭✭TJM


    bmoferrall wrote:
    I think most people would agree that the Alfa 166 facelift was an improvement.

    Before:
    alfa_romeo_166_800.jpg

    After:
    alt01.jpg

    To be honest, it would have been harder to make the original worse!
    Absolutely. The original 166 always reminded me of the Ford Scorpio with its "droopy eyes".


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭knifey_spoonie


    The facelifted corolla which really hepls the IMO

    deshughesf5aaecb1-81f5-442f-9728-c5460948a407_front.jpg

    deshughesde262cc7-3791-4f7b-92a3-aeb2c82c6294_Front.jpg


Advertisement