Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland and the Olympics from Athens to London

Options
  • 22-11-2005 3:17pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭


    From here:
    Press Release
    Committee on Arts, Sport, Tourism, Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs
    Re: Oireachtas Committee Report entitled ‘Ireland and the Olympics From Athens to London’.
    • Deputy Cecilia Keaveney T.D. Chairwoman of the Oireachtas Committee on Arts, Sport, Tourism, Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs will launch at 12 midday on Tuesday 22 November her Committee’s eighth report entitled “Ireland and the Olympics: From Athens to London”. The report deals with the fall out from the Athens Olympiad from an Irish perspective and with the issue of a sport for all policy. The Report acknowledges the fiasco in Athens and makes certain recommendations for the future, chief of which is the recommendation that the Department of Arts, Sport and Tourism establish and chair a steering committee to co-ordinate and manage the 2012 Olympic Roadmap. The Joint Committee feels that this is necessary to keep the various stakeholders working together with a common purpose. If this requires legislative change so be it. There are various other recommendations dealing with funding for coaches as well as for athletes, the early identification of potential participants and the foundation of an Irish Institute of Sport.
    • The report also strongly supports a sport for all policy and makes certain recommendations for the expansion of such a policy.
    • Finally the Report anticipates the impact of London 2012 on our young people. The proximity and the 24 hour media coverage will spur them to involvement with and participation in international sport and perhaps the best for Irish sport will be in Olympiads subsequent to 2012.

    Here's the download page.

    Some interesting conclusions in the report, and some pretty serious consequences for the NGBs who are going to be held ever more tightly to the ISC's model of investing in sport, rather than funding it...
    RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE
    The Joint Committee recognises the primacy of the participants in the Games
    as being paramount and in keeping with the Olympic ideals.
    1. That the Department of Arts Sport and Tourism establish and Chair a steering committee to co-ordinate and manage the 2012 Olympic Roadmap.
    2. That the ISC immediately prepare a 2012 Roadmap for planning up to
      and including the London Olympics.
    3. That all support agencies develop an agreed set of performance indicators
      in line with the 2012 Roadmap subject to approval and monitoring of the
      Steering Committee.
    4. That the ‘vacuum’ situation surrounding the staffing arrangements in the
      NCTC be addressed as a priority by the SCI and NCTC.
    5. The Joint Committee views the immediate establishment of the Institute of
      Sport as a critical element in the high performance strategy and one which
      should play an essential role in the preparation for the Beijing and London
      Olympiads. It is recommended that the ISC establish the Institute of Sport
      as a number one priority in its 2006-2008 Strategic Plan.
    6. That the establishment of a direct funding link between the SCI and carded
      athletes should be actively considered with a view to delivering a simpler
      and more effective system for athletes.
    7. That the SCI define performance targets for all support agencies receiving
      grants as a basis for measuring value for money and for measuring
      progress along the proposed 2012 Roadmap.
    8. That the International Carding Scheme provide 3- 4 year financial
      commitments to athletes of 2012 potential based on their performance
      pathway early in their careers.
    9. That agreement should be reached at Olympic Performance Committee
      level regarding closing dates for Olympic qualifications in consultation
      with the athletes.
    10. That the OCI prepare and submit operational proposals for discussion with
      the OPC on how to define the ‘best of the B standard’ athletes for inclusion
      on the Olympic Team.
    11. That the OCI introduce a new quality control mechanism to the selection
      process for all Olympic support team members, in consultation with the
      team members, to optimise performance of individual athletes, the details
      of which are to be agreed with the OPC.
    12. That the ISC extend the International Carding Scheme to target funds at
      coaches working with athletes on the carding scheme.
    13. That the ISC develop a pilot mentoring programme for previously carded
      athletes with a view to facilitating knowledge transfer to new athletes.
    14. The OCI should develop annual performance measures for the Athletes
      Commission.
    15. That the SCI undertake annual independent research to measure the
      satisfaction rating of athletes in terms of Olympic preparation planning.
    16. That the areas for improvement identified in chapter 2 be reviewed
      biannually by support agencies particularly drug use and the use of dietary
      supplements.
    17. That the SCI increase its primary schools funding of sports development
      significantly over its 2006-2008 strategic plan and that sports partnerships
      be immediately rolled out throughout the country.
    18. That SCI co-ordinate a new secondary schools Physical Education
      initiative in association with the Department of Education and Science and
      the Department of Health and Children to promote the principle of Sport for All.
    19. The co-ordinating committee in consultation with athletes and support
      agencies prepare a comprehensive strategy for the development and
      management of ‘team spirit’, embodying national pride spanning from
      2005 until the return of the team from Beijing.

    Perhaps the most worrying part in the report from the NGB's point of view should be from page 28:
    Organisational support structures
    In general athletes were concerned that the current organisational support structures were not as professional as they would expect or required. Some athletes decided to establish their own support structure because they viewed the available services to be inadequate or not expert enough to meet their specific needs. Recognising the importance of addressing the prevention of drugs in sport, the issue of drugs can become an overriding concern of support agencies, while issues relating to sickness of athletes can be overlooked. Where this happens it can contribute to low morale in athletes.
    Despite the systems of support and review that are in place, athletes often feel that their views are not being listened to or being taken on board. This is particularly frustrating for the individuals on whom all eyes rest for delivering the final sporting performance.
    For some athletes there is still a feeling that their success is being achieved ‘in spite of the system’. This is in part a reflection on the fact that the reality of the athlete’s day to day interface with support agencies is not seen as being aligned with the policy statement and objectives of agencies to be athlete-centred.


Advertisement