Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

US Democrats' Stance on ICC

Options
  • 29-11-2005 10:34pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭


    Does anybody know whether or not the Democrats, if they come to power in the States, plan to ratify the Statute of Rome making the USA a party to the International Criminal Court? What's their a policy on this issue?


Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,396 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    The Democrat position on it is frosty. Clinton refused to sign it in 1998. Shortly before he left office, he signed it stating that the thing still had flaws, and he recommended that his successor not submit it to the Senate for ratification until those flaws had been changed.

    It seems that the difference is that Clinton's administration didn't want the ICC as proposed, and wanted the ICC changed to something more acceptable. Bush's administration doesn't want the ICC, period.

    Either way, regardless of 'how much' the two parties don't like the ICC, it seems neither is too keen on it right now.

    This is a decent comparison of the two side's positions:
    http://www.unausa.org/site/pp.asp?c=fvKRI8MPJpF&b=345925

    NTM


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭gaf1983


    Thanks a million Manic, that link's very helpful.


Advertisement