Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back a page or two to re-sync the thread and this will then show latest posts. Thanks, Mike.

test install xp64 on 32bit machine?

  • 20-12-2005 11:06pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭


    acording to ms in may2005 conference its not possible -

    "A: There is no way to virtualize a 64-bit environment on a 32-bit processor. 64-bit by nature is hardware dependent. So until there is a 64-but version of Virtual PC running on a 64-Bit Operating System on a 64-bit Processor, no."

    anyone got anything else to say?
    its basically to test the install process as a favor for someone and i dont have a 64bit processor.

    thanks,
    sub


Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,385 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Back in the days when 386 first arrived, people were wondering should they stay with 286's or make the jump. The conclusion then was that for most purposes 286 code would run just as fast on either chip and the 286's were a lot cheaper.

    However, on a 286 the new 386 instructions ran at exactly 0 MHz.

    So at a guess the only way to do it would be to install on a virtual machine but doesn't really test it. Or if it could install without the 64 bit instructions , again not a test.

    BTW: Win /D:T is the command to get 16 bit windows 3.11 to run in standard mode on a 8086. It runs but it's missing a few things ( especially if you use the CGA driver from win 3.0 ;) ) and since it's missing all the 386 enhanced stuff... but hey you knew it would be slow on an 8086


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭Cal


    Back in the days when 386 first arrived,

    Ah!! That huge jump from Windows 286 to Windows 386 :D . I wasn't sure too many around here people remember all the hastle of dealing with the extra floppies involved with the upgrade.

    Cal.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,385 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Cal wrote:
    I wasn't sure too many around here people remember all the hastle of dealing with the extra floppies involved with the upgrade.
    There are quite a few who have to deal with Disk 10 in Windows 95 being corrupt. :mad:


Advertisement