Nip-tuck FINALE AIRED THE CARVER IS.......

derekded85 · 22-12-2005 7:32pm #1

IT'S QUEINTIN

really disapointing & the matt story
makes next season DARK & Julia's
secret, not sure did i like it!
It cut the cool Liz to early.
This season Julia killed someone
and really does not seem to bother
her WHY??????

Overall i did like this season

Mr E · 22-12-2005 9:22pm

Are you a MORON?

(a) there is already a Nip/Tuck thread
(b) use spoilers, you muppet.

:rolleyes:

norbert64 · 23-12-2005 4:10pm

this is classic

well done d00d

derekded85 · 23-12-2005 9:30pm

what do u mean!

blahblah06 · 23-12-2005 9:31pm

some people would have liken to watch the program like me

Basq · 23-12-2005 9:35pm

There's so many things wrong with this thread that it's giving me a nosebleed!

norbert64 · 23-12-2005 10:54pm

derekded85 wrote:

what do u mean!

as TmB said, there is already a thread so you could have posted there.

However more to the point, alorra of us here are watching it on Sky1, & we are only up to S3 Ep 10, so we don't know who the carver is yet.
Well some us technically do, we found out for ourselves, coz we're not patient, lol, but for the others you should have put your revelation in spoiler tags, (remove the space between /B] & [I]spoiler[/I)
[ spoiler]insert text here[/spoiler]

Smurfpiss · 23-12-2005 11:49pm

twit.

ixoy · 25-12-2005 12:25am

OK, perhaps I'm missing something here, but ... why are you all jumping so harshly? Admittedly, the thread title could have had the word [SPOILERS] in it but surely the fact it said "FINALE AIRED" and was clearly talking about who the Carver was is enough? An admonishment maybe, but this crucifixion puzzles me..

norbert64 · 25-12-2005 12:55pm

ixoy wrote:

OK, perhaps I'm missing something here, but ... why are you all jumping so harshly? Admittedly, the thread title could have had the word [SPOILERS] in it but surely the fact it said "FINALE AIRED" and was clearly talking about who the Carver was is enough? An admonishment maybe, but this crucifixion puzzles me..

hehe, you know how ppl are. They would have looked. Also, as you prolly know, by just hovering your mouse over the thread title, it shows the spoiler.

derekded85 · 27-12-2005 9:55pm

why would you go into a thread clearly giving away the ending if you did not want to know it!

LOGIC

byte · 27-12-2005 10:38pm

Curiousity I suppose for most folk.

Either way you should have used [.spoiler] tags or mentioned that it was a Spoiler in the thread title, or ideally both.

Skyuser · 28-12-2005 2:47am

poeple just like to complain

Lafortezza · 28-12-2005 3:12pm

When you look at the TV forum and hover your cursor over the thread title you can still see the spoiler. At least I can.

Lump Basher · 28-12-2005 3:37pm

lafortezza wrote:

When you look at the TV forum and hover your cursor over the thread title you can still see the spoiler. At least I can.

When you see the word "SEASON FINALE" in the topic title, why not try NOT hovering your cursor over the thread title? And if you do, try not to be so shocked and pissed that a thread entitled "Nip-tuck FINALE AIRED THE CARVER IS......." actually tells you who the carver is. Basic common sense IMO.
I personally find it hard to "accidentally" click into, or 'roll over and read' a thread that obviously contains spoilers (even if it's not clearly marked, common sense and the topic title indicates the content of the thread). We can't keep catering for the lowest common denominator.

byte · 28-12-2005 4:59pm

Right, enough is enough.

Spoilered Threads SHOULD have Spoiler tags. Whether everyone likes it or not is irrelevant. It's impossible to please everyone!

And Lump Basher, that's enough of the abusive posts. If you've nothing constructive to say, don't post at all.

Thread Closed.

Nip-tuck FINALE AIRED THE CARVER IS.......

Comments