Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Good/Bad Pings??

  • 25-01-2006 6:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭


    Hey all,

    I just moved into a new house in Maynooth with Ice Wireless Broadband.

    I ran the Irish ISP test from irishisptest.com and got these results

    Download: 1.45Mbps
    Upload: 1.88Mbps

    QoS: 71%

    Round Trip : 40ms

    Max Pause : 320ms

    Running 150 pings on Jolt.co.uk/boards.ie/hosting365.ie and heanet.ie and taking the average i get this:

    heanet.ie wrote:
    Ping statistics for 193.1.219.79:
    Packets: Sent = 150, Received = 149, Lost = 1 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 2358ms, Average = 158ms
    Ping statistics for 82.195.128.250:
    Packets: Sent = 150, Received = 149, Lost = 1 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 2501ms, Average = 133ms
    boards.ie wrote:
    Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
    Packets: Sent = 150, Received = 149, Lost = 1 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 2501ms, Average = 143ms
    jolt.co.uk wrote:
    Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
    Packets: Sent = 150, Received = 148, Lost = 2 (1% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 2338ms, Average = 152ms

    Any idea if these pings are good enough to play online or are they rubbish??

    Advice would be appreciated..


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    anybody feel like answering now? :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭Airblazer


    they're terrible..I'm presuming your on a 2mb package in which case you should be getting a ping of 30ms or less to irish/uk sites...
    For gaming anything above 150ms will be no good and in all honesty they should be below 100ms for a true gaming experience..
    Also your qos (quality of service) should be hitting at least the 95% mark when everything is going ok.
    I suggest you ring Ice and let them know about your high pings (max pings of 2501ms are quite simply unacceptable).

    P.S. I'm on Digiweb Metro (3mb/512kb) and I get approx 19ms to boards.ie and approx 22ms to heanet..
    On most bf2 servers (european servers) my highest ping would be about 60ms but most are around the 34ms mark.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    Airblazer wrote:
    they're terrible..I'm presuming your on a 2mb package in which case you should be getting a ping of 30ms or less to irish/uk sites...
    For gaming anything above 150ms will be no good and in all honesty they should be below 100ms for a true gaming experience..
    Also your qos (quality of service) should be hitting at least the 95% mark when everything is going ok.
    I suggest you ring Ice and let them know about your high pings (max pings of 2501ms are quite simply unacceptable).

    P.S. I'm on Digiweb Metro (3mb/512kb) and I get approx 19ms to boards.ie and approx 22ms to heanet..
    On most bf2 servers (european servers) my highest ping would be about 60ms but most are around the 34ms mark.

    Cheers For that Airblazer, i'll give them a ring now :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    can you post some traceroute's?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭Airblazer


    Cheers For that Airblazer, i'll give them a ring now :)

    no problemo


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    ntlbell wrote:
    can you post some traceroute's?
    Boards wrote:
    Tracing route to www.boards.ie [82.195.136.250]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 53 ms 42 ms 39 ms 213.168.230.1
    2 75 ms 144 ms 83 ms 213.168.225.241
    3 36 ms 99 ms 49 ms 213.168.224.18
    4 718 ms 1154 ms 290 ms 213.242.106.13
    5 150 ms 81 ms 90 ms so-4-1-0.bbr2.London1.Level3.net [4.68.128.117]
    6 105 ms 91 ms 50 ms ge-11-2.ipcolo1.London1.Level3.net [212.187.131.179]
    7 133 ms 141 ms 164 ms panama.hosting365.ie [82.195.128.2]
    8 82 ms 101 ms 74 ms corerouter1.hosting365.ie [82.195.128.7]
    9 1038 ms * 125 ms boards.ie [82.195.136.250]

    HEAnet wrote:
    1 143 ms 181 ms 130 ms 213.168.230.1
    2 * 60 ms 41 ms 213.168.225.241
    3 118 ms 51 ms 72 ms sl-gw1-dub-6-0-0.sprintlink.net [80.93.1.97]
    4 101 ms 69 ms 197 ms sl-bb21-dub-0-0.sprintlink.net [80.93.0.66]
    5 97 ms 61 ms 65 ms sl-bb21-lon-2-2.sprintlink.net [213.206.129.112]
    6 260 ms 105 ms 150 ms 213.206.131.26
    7 97 ms 100 ms 95 ms so0-0-0-2488M.ar1.DUB1.gblx.net [67.17.66.6]
    8 116 ms 112 ms 106 ms HEAnet-2.so-3-0-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net [208.48.23.54]
    9 97 ms 130 ms 117 ms mantova-gige5-2.bh.access.hea.net [193.1.195.136]
    0 378 ms 140 ms 130 ms portia-po1.bh.access.hea.net [193.1.196.218]
    1 130 ms 94 ms 123 ms www.heanet.ie [193.1.219.79]

    Jolt wrote:
    Tracing route to jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 11 ms 20 ms 14 ms 213.168.230.1
    2 82 ms 48 ms 24 ms 213.168.225.241
    3 37 ms 30 ms 24 ms sl-gw1-dub-6-0-0.sprintlink.net [80.93.1.97]
    4 9 ms 11 ms 10 ms sl-bb21-dub-0-0.sprintlink.net [80.93.0.66]
    5 2030 ms 277 ms 100 ms sl-bb21-lon-2-2.sprintlink.net [213.206.129.112]
    6 650 ms 229 ms 110 ms sl-bb20-par-6-0.sprintlink.net [213.206.129.138]
    7 58 ms 38 ms 69 ms sl-gw10-par-14-0.sprintlink.net [217.118.224.38]
    8 36 ms 36 ms 59 ms sl-telia1-5-0.sprintlink.net [217.118.225.234]
    9 60 ms 74 ms 79 ms prs-bb1-pos6-1-3.telia.net [213.248.70.1]
    10 66 ms 87 ms 115 ms ldn-bb1-pos7-2-0.telia.net [213.248.64.10]
    11 76 ms 37 ms 44 ms ldn-b3-pos6-0.telia.net [213.248.65.238]
    12 68 ms 52 ms 39 ms pipex-110586-ldn-b3.c.telia.net [213.248.100.30]
    13 49 ms * 505 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [84.12.224.14]
    14 41 ms 139 ms 42 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.214]
    15 110 ms 196 ms 50 ms 82.133.85.65

    There ya go, traceroutes to boards,heanet and jolt.co.uk


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Well that seems to answer your own question.

    That's some disgusting routing for an Irish ISP.

    ringing them won't do alot for you i'm afraid.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 69 ✭✭keyran


    Have you switched of anything else you might have running. VOIP Limewire stuff like that?

    Stuff that might be using bandwidth. Try temp disabling the firewall as well and tracert again see if there is any improvement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    ntlbell wrote:
    Well that seems to answer your own question.

    That's some disgusting routing for an Irish ISP.

    ringing them won't do alot for you i'm afraid.

    How would the ISP improve traceroutes though, i know there is nothing an enduser can do.

    Could you post your traceroutes to compare hops?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    keyran wrote:
    Have you switched of anything else you might have running. VOIP Limewire stuff like that?

    Stuff that might be using bandwidth. Try temp disabling the firewall as well and tracert again see if there is any improvement.

    Tracing route to www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 8 ms 7 ms 17 ms 213.168.230.1
    2 16 ms 277 ms 424 ms 213.168.225.241
    3 39 ms 11 ms 16 ms sl-gw1-dub-6-0-0.sprintlink.net [80.93.1.97]
    4 15 ms 8 ms 10 ms sl-bb21-dub-0-0.sprintlink.net [80.93.0.66]
    5 25 ms 33 ms 22 ms sl-bb21-lon-2-2.sprintlink.net [213.206.129.112]

    6 571 ms 167 ms 442 ms sl-bb20-par-6-0.sprintlink.net [213.206.129.138]

    7 35 ms 41 ms 28 ms sl-gw10-par-14-0.sprintlink.net [217.118.224.38]

    8 50 ms 28 ms 35 ms sl-telia1-5-0.sprintlink.net [217.118.225.234]
    9 28 ms 27 ms 31 ms prs-bb1-pos6-1-3.telia.net [213.248.70.1]
    10 1345 ms 242 ms 119 ms ldn-bb1-pos7-2-0.telia.net [213.248.64.10]
    11 37 ms 45 ms 45 ms ldn-b3-pos6-0.telia.net [213.248.65.238]
    12 33 ms 61 ms 39 ms pipex-110586-ldn-b3.c.telia.net [213.248.100.30]

    13 83 ms 55 ms 31 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [84.12.224.14]
    14 51 ms 42 ms 84 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.214]
    15 37 ms 25 ms 41 ms 82.133.85.65


    Theres the one i get with firewall off..better ping times just reflect less traffic to work through, same hops etc...


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭Airblazer


    what firewall are you using? Zonealarm?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    How would the ISP improve traceroutes though, i know there is nothing an enduser can do.

    Could you post your traceroutes to compare hops?

    By building a decent network in the first place.

    It looks like they took a bit of a budget route for capacity Packet Exchange sprint etc.

    so as you can see in your trace to boards.ie your hopping around dublin then over half of the uk, then back Dublin.

    I can't see your pings ever been GREAT but they could be a bit better.


    2.231.46.73]
    3 11 ms 7 ms 7 ms DN04-fe-1-3-0-352-guinness.irishbroadband.ie [83
    .141.117.185]
    4 12 ms 7 ms 7 ms DN42-as0-0-ibis-access.irishbroadband.ie [62.231
    .52.153]
    5 11 ms 8 ms 7 ms DN42-ge-0-2-0-50-ibis-gw.irishbroadband.ie [62.2
    31.52.157]
    6 13 ms 7 ms 7 ms panama-inex.hosting365.ie [193.242.111.87]
    7 14 ms 10 ms 12 ms corerouter1.hosting365.ie [82.195.128.7]
    8 16 ms 9 ms 10 ms boards.ie [82.195.136.250]


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭Naikon


    I am with Digiweb 2mb/s and my results from that particular test is as follows

    Download:483kbps
    Upload:217kbps
    Roundtriptime:92ms
    Max pause:884ms
    service quality:62%

    Pretty shocking considering i thought digiweb were supposedly great for DSL.
    I do have a wireless connection to my router from my pc but it is 2 meters from my desk and these results are pretty crap:mad:

    I am going to ring them about it.

    Anyone know if the wireless is to blame:confused:

    Cheers;)


Advertisement