dublindudes vanity thread

amp

Ag marbh wrote:

Im just going to label you based on what I see, no need to further justify it for myself as i'm perfectly content.

You went for the newbie card once again displaying your hunger to be above.

Above what?

AARRRGH

Victor wrote:

are you jsut the guy I've banned twice from PI for rambling off-topic posts?

People were talking (debating) about Asian men having small penises. I added my opinion. I GET BANNED.

Were the people who brought up the small penis thing banned?

I think not.

...

Amp. Chill.

Ag marbh

amp wrote:

Above what?

Let me re-iterate a slightly modified version of something you said earlier.

I feel that people who are stupid enough to not understand something very simple deserve any kind of communication from me explaining why they were stupid.

edanto

[ot]

Ag marbh wrote:

by the way I see you go on around some of the forums and especially the prison forum I would certainly say you would enjoy banning immensely.

Have a look at the charter of the prison forum and see if you think Amp was breaking any of the rules there.

[/ot]

Giblet

Ag marbh wrote:

hahahahahahahaha ^


Speaking of the "Go away" comment. Last time I pm'd Giblet asking him when a ban would expire I got nothing but "Go away" but I guess i'll be told a low life poster doesn't deserve any better? Get up out of that.

Was that because of your incessant trolling and crap on the punk board, or was it after hours?
Because if you are who I remember, go away.

Ag marbh

edanto wrote:

I edited my post to put in the off-topic square brackets. Find the charter yet?

Of course I know how to locate the charter and I don't have any interest in reading it. Im judging by his personality so a charter isn't required for that.

amp

Ag marbh wrote:

Let me re-iterate a slightly modified version of something you said earlier.

I feel that people who are stupid enough to not understand something very simple deserve any kind of communication from me explaining why they were stupid.

You make allegations. You can't back them up. Conclusion: you're full of shít, just like Dublindude.

Ag marbh

Giblet wrote:

Was that because of your incessant trolling and crap on the punk board?
Because if you are who I remember, go away.

I dissed EMO music in the EMO thread but posted on other topics. Many other people did too and you banned me rom one board then openly said on another board that you had a personal vandetta against me which resulted in you instantly banning me from 3 boards. Your ban count went to three that day because of your "personal vandetta".

EDIT - I got that mixed up a bit. You banned me for being a bollox on After hours(Which I admit) and then you banned me on petty things on the other two boards because of your personal vandetta. Other people had done these petty things which were really petty and they escaped a ban.

AARRRGH

OK. Enough ridiculous insulting.

I always think, "Would I act like this in real life?". If we were having this conversation in a pub, everyone would be friendly and polite, so please stop being the internet tough guys.

Can we get back to the idea of -

better communication when someone is banned
understanding that people express themselves differently
understanding that people have different opinions, sometimes extreme opinions; this is natural and not a banable offence

There is no need to get angry with each other!

WhiteWashMan

dublindude wrote:

But this is abusing your power. If a non-mod insults, he is banned (rightly so.) You should not get away with it just because you're a mod.

I fully believe in attacking the post. Attacking the poster is always wrong.



Feedback and personal abuse are two totally different things. I have no problem with you disagreeing with my opinions on things (I'm fully aware I have very strong opinions on some things) but to continuously take it down to a personal level, just because you can, is sad and wrong.



Don't be silly



I am sensitive with my posts. I never insult people.

...

This is the feedback forum. I was giving feedback that a banning process (basically, telling someone why they're banned) would be a good idea. It's not such an outrageous, let's get all offended, suggestion. It does make sense to tell someone why they're banned. Worst case scenario the bannie can think about their actions and learn from it.

i am not a mod of this forum.
if an admin or an smod feels the need to ban me, im sure they wont hesitate.


so its hardly an abuse of my power, since i dont have any here.

come on, show me this abuse of power.

its amazing. you complain about it so much, but you never manage to bring any examples to the party.


all bark and no bite as usual.

WhiteWashMan

dublindude wrote:

I always think, "Would I act like this in real life?". If we were having this conversation in a pub, everyone would be friendly and polite, so please stop being the internet tough guys.!

youre a stupid cúnt.

id say it to your face as well.

Victor

dublindude wrote:

You are being very defensive/aggressive in this topic though. I'm just making a suggestion/giving feedback.

No amp is mostly taking the pee* in this thread.

* Added nuggets of wisdom.

---

The history of this ban is roughly.

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054878110

original poster wrote:

Im working with this chinese girl that I like but I'm finding it vey hard to approach her. I've a fear if I go over and chat her up, ask her out the whole lot she'll just look at me like an ejit and tell me to get lost like she already did to another guy. Anybody have any history on this. What do chinese girls like? Are they even interested in Irish blokes?

.... several posts posts ....

Anarchist wrote:

They like Chinese guys mostly or Tall Cavan types cos they like the Chinese have small manhoods.

Samhildanach wrote:

By the way you're talking out of your ****! That myth about Chinese men is not true.

dublindude wrote:

It is true. I've seen Asian porn, and from my experience Asian girls have terribly small vaginas (which would make sense with the small penis thing.)

Now perhaps I hmade a mistake in my next post, I was goign to just say "cop on", but felt I had to knock Anarchist's assertion on its head.

Victor wrote:

Cop on.

The only meaningful comparison of race and penis size I've seen has been that penis size is generally in proportion to body size. Some populations are larger than others. That said, Asian adults are growing at something like 50mm per generation, there are a lot of Asians as big as if not bigger than their internatiopnal counterparts.

What holds true for large populations doesn't necessarily hold true for individuals

No despite the general "Cop on" warning, dublindude persists.

dublindude wrote:

?

Have you ever seen an Asian porn movie where the Asian guy was not absolutely tiny? And Asian women do have "short" vaginas.

There does seem to be some kind of connection...

It's OK to say Asian men have small penises. It's not racist.

And please don't give me the "What holds true for large populations doesn't necessarily hold true for individuals" cop out. Of course there are exceptions. I am not referring to every single Asian man in the world. Just in general..

Its off-topic, disruptive, non-constructive, bigoted and details just a little bit too much of dublindudes interests.

Victor bans dublindude.

Victor wrote:

Go away.

dublindude wrote:

Victor, just because you disagree with me is not a valid banning offence.

In fact, you actually agreed with what I was saying. You just felt like being argumentative.

Devore: Victor has some kind of grudge with me. He is always trying to ban me from PI. If you look at my posts on PI you will see I don't take the piss.

No seeing as I've come along late to this thread, I should point out I have made this offer.

Victor wrote:

Hi,

.....

dublindude wrote:

So, how long is the ban for?

I'm going to play you at your own game, how long do you think it should be for going really off-topic?

Victor

amp

dublindude wrote:

OK. Enough ridiculous insulting.

I don't see insulting. I see you spouting crap you can't back up.

I always think, "Would I act like this in real life?". If we were having this conversation in a pub, everyone would be friendly and polite, so please stop being the internet tough guys.

I presume then you often walk to groups of people in pubs and tell them how they should drink or eat their crisps despite the fact that you don't drink yourself or have eaten crisps.

Can we get back to the idea of -

better communication when someone is banned

Banned people are stupid and do not deserve better communication.

understanding that people express themselves differently
understanding that people have different opinions, sometimes extreme opinions; this is natural and not a banable offence

What is and what is not a bannable offence is up to moderators, smods and admins.

There is no need to get angry with each other!

Stupid people make me angry.

Giblet

Ag marbh wrote:

I dissed EMO music in the EMO thread but posted on other topics. Many other people did too and you banned me rom one board then openly said on another board that you had a personal vandetta against me which resulted in you instantly banning me from 3 boards. Your ban count went to three that day because of your "personal vandetta".

EDIT - I got that mixed up a bit. You banned me for being a bollox on After hours(Which I admit) and then you banned me on petty things on the other two boards because of your personal vandetta. Other people had done these petty things which were really petty and they escaped a ban.

I remember this now, I just looked up my report on the Mod forum.

Weird, because the AH ban was permanent (after discussion with my Co-mod)

You were banned for general muppetry across numerous forums, a judgement call on my behalf. Also posting obscene pictures in FAP (which you quickly deleted) lead me to believe you wouldn't be missed. I dunno what happened with the AH ban, but you can get back into Punk if you want. I'll be handing that over to someone soon (Hobart most likely)

The punk ban was because I had said to stop dissing emo threads multiple times. Alt/Indie for advocating the use of illegal software to download stuff.

WhiteWashMan

amp wrote:

Banned people are stupid and do not deserve better communication.

.

beauty in truth.

AARRRGH

Amp, you've totally lost me at this stage.

VICTOR! I like the way you only pisted a snippet of your PM And you can post my very resonable response if you like.

If you're going to quote you and me, I would rather it was in full, not just the nice bits you said.

Anyway, we're going off topic here.

I think your PI ban was unfair. But forgetting that for a minute, an explanation why I was banned (like you've tried to do now) would have made more sense at the time, rather than simply "Go Away".

Ag marbh

Giblet wrote:

I remember this now, I just looked up my report on the Mod forum.

Weird, because the AH ban was permanent (after discussion with my Co-mod)

You were banned for general muppetry across numerous forums, a judgement call on my behalf. Also posting obscene pictures in FAP (which you quickly deleted) lead me to believe you wouldn't be missed. I dunno what happened with the AH ban, but you can get back into Punk if you want. I'll be handing that over to someone soon (Hobart most likely)

The punk ban was because I had said to stop dissing emo threads multiple times. Alt/Indie for advocating the use of illegal software to download stuff.

What illegal software was I promoting? I have no memory of the alternative/indie one but the punk one was pretty petty and I wouldn't mind been unbanned but doubt I will be posting much as all of that Greenday bitching angers me!

amp

dublindude wrote:

Amp, you've totally lost me at this stage.

I think I posted in English and in short, easy to understand sentences. Is there any part in particular you're having trouble with?

I think your PI ban was unfair. But forgetting that for a minute, an explanation why I was banned (like you've tried to do now) would have made more sense at the time, rather than simply "Go Away".

AHA! The real issue here. Not a systematic problem with moderators and how they moderate. This thread is merely yet another WA WA I WAS BANNED AND I CAN'T HANDLE IT COS I'M STUPID!

WhiteWashMan

dublindude wrote:

Amp, you've totally lost me at this stage.

VICTOR! I like the way you only pisted a snippet of your PM And you can post my very resonable response if you like.

If you're going to quote you and me, I would rather it was in full, not just the nice bits you said.

Anyway, we're going off topic here.

I think your PI ban was unfair. But forgetting that for a minute, an explanation why I was banned (like you've tried to do now) would have made more sense at the time, rather than simply "Go Away".

i love the weay you completely ignore my repeated requests for proof of my power abuse.

come on, cough up or shut up.

Victor

dublindude wrote:

But forgetting that for a minute, an explanation why I was banned (like you've tried to do now) would have made more sense at the time, rather than simply "Go Away".

But you knew why I banned you.

Nevyn

Personally I think it is appaling we need a banning policy, people should read the charters and abide by the rules when posting and heed mods when they get a warning for going off topic.

Don't misbehave and you don't get punished.

Lafortezza

Damn, a rollercoaster of a Feedback thread and me with no O RLY? pictures.

AARRRGH

amp wrote:

AHA! The real issue here. Not a systematic problem with moderators and how they moderate. This thread is merely yet another WA WA I WAS BANNED AND I CAN'T HANDLE IT COS I'M STUPID!

No. If someone asks me a specific question, I'll answer. Victor asked me a specific question.

WWM: I've mentioned many times about your insulting thing. Honestly, (and sorry to sound so traditional here), if your mother knew you were so insulting and angry like this, what would she think? Would you be proud of this or embarrassed?

edanto

Ag marbh wrote:

I know how to locate the charter and I don't have any interest in reading it.

*cough*

I hope you don't feel that way about all charters. Therein lie the ancient secrets to not getting banned.

But look about the prison charter... there is none. So, Amp, or you, can go in there and say anything you want to anyone.

Ag marbh

edanto wrote:

*cough*

I hope you don't feel that way about all charters. Therein lie the ancient secrets to not getting banned.

But look about the prison charter... there is none. So, Amp, or you, can go in there and say anything you want to anyone.

I think you misread my original judgement on amp. I wasn't going at an abuse of power disobeying the charter angle which you seem to of thought I was so stop trying to grab some brownie points and exit.

AARRRGH

Victor wrote:

But you knew why I banned you.

Because I disagreed with your "Asian men don't have small penises" opinion? That is not a valid banning excuse! People should be allowed have differing views, no matter how way out they may seem to you.

Giblet

lafortezza wrote:

Damn, a rollercoaster of a Feedback thread and me with no O RLY? pictures.

WhiteWashMan

dublindude wrote:

No. If someone asks me a specific question, I'll answer. Victor asked me a specific question.

WWM: I've mentioned many times about your insulting thing. Honestly, (and sorry to sound so traditional here), if your mother knew you were so insulting and angry like this, what would she think? Would you be proud of this or embarrassed?

actually my mother is dead, so i dont supose she cares.

however, nice tactic to try and change the subject, but im looking for that proof you were going to offer.

if you cant show me any examples of this so called power abuse of mine, then please shut up.

i suggest if you are upset by my insults, you report the posts. i mean seriously, you want mods to follow some rediculous law set down by you, yet you fail to do anything else so simple as report a post, or god forbid, stay within the broad confines of a forum charter?

at this stage, i think you should be permanently banned for trolling.

WhiteWashMan

dublindude wrote:

Because I disagreed with your "Asian men don't have small penises" opinion? That is not a valid banning excuse! People should be allowed have differing views, no matter how way out they may seem to you.

you werent banned for having an opinion.

you are stupid.

where is amp.

amp, tell him he is stupid again.

amp

dublindude wrote:

No. If someone asks me a specific question, I'll answer. Victor asked me a specific question.

Excellent, here are some specific questions:

Do you go up to strangers in a bar and tell them how to drink and how to eat crisps? Would you expect a friendly answer?

But like I said, this thread is not about how moderating happens on boards. This thread is specifically for you to challenge a ban because you think you're that important. Most users would take it up with the moderator but that's not good enough for your ego, oh no. It's a crusade for you.

WWM: I've mentioned many times about your insulting thing. Honestly, (and sorry to sound so traditional here), if your mother knew you were so insulting and angry like this, what would she think? Would you be proud of this or embarrassed?

You seem to be under the illusion that moderators are not allowed to insult anyone. Specific question: why do you think that?