Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish isp test

  • 24-02-2006 6:18pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭


    Hi All,

    We've made some drastic changes to the site and how the tests work etc. You now have to register (I know it is annoying) to be able to test your broadband connection. But it stores the results in a db and it'll display the last 10 results so if you are having problems with your line you can copy and paste the results into an e-mail and send to your ISP. :)

    it also graphs the results in funky flash graphs.

    The registration automatically enables you to login to the forum aswell. <edit>People who have an account on the forum previously can logon to the main page also using the same details </edit>

    Paul


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭bminish


    flamegrill wrote:
    Hi All,

    We've made some drastic changes to the site and how the tests work etc.

    Paul

    It's still not even remotely accurate. It's showing my 10Mb uncontended symmetrical connection as 2Mb down 361 K up.

    .brendan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,802 ✭✭✭thegills


    Bminish,
    Can you suggest a more accurate test.
    thegills


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭bminish


    thegills wrote:
    Bminish,
    Can you suggest a more accurate test.
    thegills

    # curl -o /dev/null http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/centos/4.2/isos/i386/CentOS-4.2.ServerCD-i386.iso
    % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
    Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
    6 558M 6 36.8M 0 0 1154k 0 0:08:15 0:00:32 0:07:43 1137k


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭flamegrill


    bminish wrote:
    It's still not even remotely accurate. It's showing my 10Mb uncontended symmetrical connection as 2Mb down 361 K up.

    .brendan

    Hi Brendan,

    its designed for asymetric lines. Anything over 8mbit down 1mbit up won't report accurately. It is extremely accurate for dsl and cable connections.

    Paul


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭bminish


    flamegrill wrote:
    Hi Brendan,

    its designed for asymetric lines. Anything over 8mbit down 1mbit up won't report accurately. It is extremely accurate for dsl and cable connections.

    Paul

    So why does it so drastically under-report low latency symmetrical connections then ?

    In any case when I run the test via a 5M/512Kbs Netsource ADSL line with no other traffic on it I get 931Kbs down 286Kbs Up.
    (A test on DSLreports of the Same ADSL line using a server in California manages 1.2 Mb down and 240kb Up )

    This test does not appear to be a reliable test of true internet performance yet people are using it as a basis to complain about their ISPs

    .brendan


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 562 ✭✭✭ro2


    Good work. Can't get it over 66Mb/s though. I'd say I'll hit the hundred mark when you that INEX connection juiced up :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭ghostdancer


    flamegrill wrote:
    It is extremely accurate for dsl and cable connections.

    Paul


    not for mine it isn't. starts off at the right download speed, then drops dramatically for no appparent reason coming towards the end of the test and often settles at anywhere from 1MB-2MB down.

    downloading an ISO from heanet gives a steady, consistent 330kbps...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,780 ✭✭✭✭JPA


    Why does it not work properly in Opera?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭flamegrill


    You need a jre installed for it to work.

    Your browser should have the ability to install one.

    Aye, when our INEX connection goes live all the iffy results should go. That is once we peer directly with eircom/esat/netsource/heanet/digiweb etc ..

    Regards,

    Paul


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 14,713 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dcully


    This is very inaccurate tbh.
    Ill stick with heanet for accuracy.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Blaster99


    flamegrill wrote:
    Hi All,

    We've made some drastic changes to the site and how the tests work etc. You now have to register (I know it is annoying) to be able to test your broadband connection. But it stores the results in a db and it'll display the last 10 results so if you are having problems with your line you can copy and paste the results into an e-mail and send to your ISP. :)

    Could this not have been achieved with a cookie?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 268 ✭✭UberNewb


    Nice site,

    Good work flamegrill!


  • Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 19,124 Mod ✭✭✭✭byte
    byte


    Why must so many slam the service? It is free, and if ya don't like it, don't use it.

    Personally, I find it handy.


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,811 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    It's only really a problem if you're an ISP and it dramatically misrepresents your customers' connection speeds.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭Airblazer


    oscarBravo wrote:
    It's only really a problem if you're an ISP and it dramatically misrepresents your customers' connection speeds.

    maybe irish broadband can use that as an excuse..:D

    seriously though..i find isp test very accurate for digiweb metro so thumbs up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,554 ✭✭✭CyberGhost


    Thanks, I like it :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,857 ✭✭✭CrowdedHouse


    Why do you have to register ?

    Seven Worlds will Collide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Why do you have to register ?

    It's italian plastic.

    In order for the new features to work?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,739 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Why do you have to register ?
    The only way that we can give you the past results of your tests is if you register.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 230 ✭✭Boomer23


    its shockingly inacurate, ive a 3meg connection, and my download from Heanet is 374k.........on this crap it says im only getting 900k and 284k

    1, obviously wrong
    2, mathmatically impossible!!!!!

    my advice? DONT REGISTER, DONT GIVE SUCH FLAGRANT CHANCERS THE BUISNESS!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 125 ✭✭dan99989


    And what business would that be exactly? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭flamegrill


    HI ye.

    If anyone is seeing inaccurate results can you do a traceroute to the site please?

    One thing is for sure, the box has plenty of bandwidth and processing power to do the task at hand. But mayhaps your ISPs don't have good bandwidth outside of the INEX which means your international traffic won't be as good as it would be to say, heanet etc

    Paul


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 230 ✭✭Boomer23


    dan99989 wrote:
    And what business would that be exactly? :confused:


    well obviously there will be advertisments on the site, and the more registered "customers" there are the more advertisment the site will get


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭bminish


    flamegrill wrote:
    HI ye.

    If anyone is seeing inaccurate results can you do a traceroute to the site please?

    One thing is for sure, the box has plenty of bandwidth and processing power to do the task at hand. But mayhaps your ISPs don't have good bandwidth outside of the INEX which means your international traffic won't be as good as it would be to say, heanet etc

    Paul

    Lovely, blame the ISP's why don't ya!

    We are well connected and can get pretty much the same speeds on non INEX peered sites
    # curl -o /dev/null ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/fedora-core/4/i386/iso/FC4-i386-disc1.iso
      % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                     Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
      3  634M    3 24.9M    0     0  1027k      0  0:10:32  0:00:24  0:10:08 1020k
    
    # ping www.irishisptest.com
    PING www.irishisptest.com (87.252.192.15) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from morgana.blacknight.ie (87.252.192.15): icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=100 ms
    64 bytes from morgana.blacknight.ie (87.252.192.15): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=101 ms
    64 bytes from morgana.blacknight.ie (87.252.192.15): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=100 ms
    64 bytes from morgana.blacknight.ie (87.252.192.15): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=101 ms
    64 bytes from morgana.blacknight.ie (87.252.192.15): icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=100 ms
    
    # ping www.tu-chemnitz.de
    PING www.tu-chemnitz.de (134.109.148.33) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from www.tu-chemnitz.de (134.109.148.33): icmp_seq=0 ttl=246 time=45.4 ms
    64 bytes from www.tu-chemnitz.de (134.109.148.33): icmp_seq=1 ttl=246 time=44.7 ms
    64 bytes from www.tu-chemnitz.de (134.109.148.33): icmp_seq=2 ttl=246 time=44.7 ms
    64 bytes from www.tu-chemnitz.de (134.109.148.33): icmp_seq=3 ttl=246 time=45.9 ms
    64 bytes from www.tu-chemnitz.de (134.109.148.33): icmp_seq=4 ttl=246 time=44.8 ms
    
    # ping www.heanet.ie
    PING heanet.webhost.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from www.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79): icmp_seq=0 ttl=58 time=7.39 ms
    64 bytes from www.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=7.82 ms
    64 bytes from www.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=7.57 ms
    64 bytes from www.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=8.02 ms
    64 bytes from www.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=7.31 ms
    64 bytes from www.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79): icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=7.41 ms
    64 bytes from www.heanet.ie (193.1.219.79): icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=7.36 ms
    
    --- heanet.webhost.heanet.ie ping statistics ---
    7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6007ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.318/7.556/8.022/0.269 ms, pipe 2
    
    
    

    Now why would blacknight be further away than a German FTP site?

    .brendan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Boomer23 wrote:
    its shockingly inacurate, ive a 3meg connection, and my download from Heanet is 374k.........on this crap it says im only getting 900k and 284k

    1, obviously wrong
    2, mathmatically impossible!!!!!

    my advice? DONT REGISTER, DONT GIVE SUCH FLAGRANT CHANCERS THE BUISNESS!

    I'ves used this with multiple isp's including NTL/Packet Exchange/Tiscalli/IBB

    My results have _always_ been bang on the button.

    Chancers? they give this service for nothing, it actually probably costs them money to provide it, bandwith is not cheap.

    If you don't want to use the service or address it in a civil manner don't bother, but don't be spouting rubbish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    bminish wrote:
    Lovely, blame the ISP's why don't ya!

    Pinging www.irishisptest.com [87.252.192.15] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55

    not sure what you're trying to prove?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 230 ✭✭Boomer23


    ntlbell wrote:
    not sure what you're trying to prove?

    obviously he is trying to show that with ping results like that you cannot get accurate readings

    traffic on a site directly affects your connection to the site, therefore if a load of people are doing tests at the same time it will show slower then if there is low traffic

    this is basics ntlbell


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭flamegrill


    Brendan,

    Provide a traceroute to the site could you please? We'll be peering at inex soon enough and have different carriers to whom we use now.

    But I get sub 1ms pings to heanet. I get similar pings to the german site as it happens. We don't peer at inex yet, so that is why some routes may be sub optimal, however it should give a good idea of how your ISP performs to networks outside of ireland. Infairness most sites viewed by end users don't use an ISP peering at inex anyway so it hardly gives a true view of your ISPs performance

    e.g.

    PING ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64): icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=0.939 ms
    64 bytes from ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.914 ms
    64 bytes from ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=0.841 ms
    64 bytes from ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=0.893 ms
    64 bytes from ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=0.944 ms

    traceroute to ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
    1 vlan-192-gw (87.252.192.1) 0.213 ms 0.196 ms 0.112 ms
    2 217.114.172.146 (217.114.172.146) 0.357 ms 0.353 ms 0.366 ms
    3 217.114.160.33 (217.114.160.33) 0.360 ms 0.356 ms 0.739 ms
    4 so-4-1-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net (64.215.184.193) 0.484 ms 0.476 ms 0.490 ms
    5 HEAnet-2.so-3-0-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net (208.48.23.54) 0.608 ms 0.476 ms 0.491 ms
    6 mantova-gige6-2.bh.access.hea.net (193.1.195.138) 0.867 ms 0.852 ms 0.864 ms
    7 viola-po1.bh.access.hea.net (193.1.196.222) 0.860 ms 0.855 ms 0.859 ms
    8 ftp.heanet.ie (193.1.193.64) 0.859 ms 0.852 ms 0.863 ms


    I get full wire speed off heanet aswell.

    For reference we have 4 stm1s to tier 1 ISPs Colt, Glbx, C&w and Esat transit.

    That is a total of 622mbps on net currently, soon to be much more and also we'll have a 100mbit pipe into inex which will show better performance for all Irish isp customers but alas it doesn't give a true view of what their international transit agreements are like.

    Paul


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭bminish


    ntlbell wrote:
    Pinging www.irishisptest.com [87.252.192.15] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=55
    Reply from 87.252.192.15: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55

    not sure what you're trying to prove?

    NTL peer in London (as well as the INEX?). What do your NTL pings to heanet.ie look like?

    This speed-test site, purportedly targeted at Irish ISP users gives seriously misleading results in many cases for Irish ISP's, Hopefully this will change once they peer at INEX
    It's not a problem that this test is inaccurate, as long as people understand that the results are also a test of how good blacknight.ie's peering arrangements are.
    The problems begin when people start whining on about how bad their ISP is based on the results of this test.
    .Brendan


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭bminish


    flamegrill wrote:
    Brendan,

    Provide a traceroute to the site could you please? We'll be peering at inex soon enough and have different carriers to whom we use now.
    Paul

    Here You go
    # tracepath www.irishisptest.com
     1:  ns2.westnet.ie (88.81.100.2)                           0.759ms pmtu 1500
     1:  mole.westnet.ie (88.81.100.1)                          0.645ms
     2:  fe0-0-1-55.edge1.tcy.dub.stisp.net (84.203.178.57)   asymm  3   6.303ms
     3:  ge1-3-0-104.core1.tcy.dub.stisp.net (84.203.130.89)  asymm  4   6.721ms
     4:  pos2-0.ar04.ldn01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.52.1)           19.961ms
     5:  pos11-1.br02.ldn01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.12.182)       asymm  6  20.608ms
     6:  ge1-0.ar2.lon2.gblx.net (195.66.224.112)             asymm  9  92.291ms
     7:  so0-0-0-2488M.ar1.DUB1.gblx.net (67.17.66.6)         asymm  9 101.358ms
     8:  Data-Electronics-Group-LTD.so-4-1-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net (64.215.184.194) asymm  9 102.583ms
     9:  217.114.160.43 (217.114.160.43)                      101.539ms
    10:  217.114.172.149 (217.114.172.149)                    asymm  9 102.617ms
    11:  morgana.blacknight.ie (87.252.192.15)                asymm 10 102.956ms reached
         Resume: pmtu 1500 hops 11 back 10
    

    .brendan


Advertisement