Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Birmingham v Liverpool

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Big Nelly wrote:
    Anyway Liverpool played well against a terrible team so Liverpool fans I wouldnt get too carried away. The majority of teams in PL would have done the same to Birmingham last night. No idea thou why they brought off Crouch who at that stage was miles ahead of Gerrard for MoM. As I have been saying for ages Crouch is class


    He's far from class. He's a bit below good for that matter.Why if, in your own words, the majority of teams in the pl would have done the same to Birmingham last night, does that single out Crouch to be any better than , say, james mcfadden at everton?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,613 ✭✭✭Big Nelly


    Stekelly wrote:
    He's far from class. He's a bit below good for that matter.Why if, in your own words, the majority of teams in the pl would have done the same to Birmingham last night, does that single out Crouch to be any better than , say, james mcfadden at everton?

    Crouch is a great link up player, not really in the Henry class but for his role is great, better player than Niall Quinn because his touch is better and he can carry the ball and run which Quinn couldnt. In the role he plays he is one of the best link up players in the Premiership. Have watched him for years at all his clubs and always done well.

    Birmingham where terrible last night which I mentioned above and most PL team would have over-run them last night in the form they where in. Does McFadden play in the same role as Crouch? NO. So how you can compare them is beyond me. Everton play in a differnet style to what Liverpool play in, Liverpool like to get the ball forward quickly to Crouch and for him to lay it off to the midfield players so they can run behind the defence. Last night in the end they didnt even bother to do that because they just walked thru the Birmingham midfield to shot.

    Everton like to play the ball to the centre and hope that Arteta/Cahill can affect the game but noiw with Beattie back from injury they are moving more towards the Liverpool style with Beattie playing the Crouch role.

    You should have compared Beattie to Crouch, if I had a choice of both player I would take Crouch because I think he is a better prospect than Beattie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    Big Nelly wrote:
    but for his role is great

    I agree 100% - he is great in that role.

    Now, all we need i someone upfront with him who can score 25 premiership goals a season and we're sorted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,613 ✭✭✭Big Nelly


    RE*AC*TOR wrote:
    I agree 100% - he is great in that role.

    Now, all we need i someone upfront with him who can score 25 premiership goals a season and we're sorted.

    news of Cisse going to Spurs again, I was watching him last night and to be honest is a joke for 14million


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 921 ✭✭✭Shaque attack


    Big Nelly wrote:
    news of Cisse going to Spurs again, I was watching him last night and to be honest is a joke for 14million
    would definitely agree, he has never shown any signs of ever being worth the money we payed for him. at the same time he is a striker and it makes no sense to me to play him out on the right. Play garcia or kewell out right or give kromkamp some time out right. it reminds of what houllier did with diouf when he wasn't living up to his reputation. cisse is a striker, play him as a striker or don't play him at all. my preference would be the latter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭MonkeyTennis


    This season is Cisses first proper season and he has scored goals. I think he should be given another chance. If we buy a striker I think Morientes should make way and not Cisse. Theres a lot been talked about jermaine defoe but we already have a nippy fox in the box player in Sinama. Sort out right midfield Rafa..feck it we need two right mids (one as cover) and the goals will come


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭redspider


    would definitely agree, Cisse has never shown any signs of ever being worth the money we payed for him. at the same time he is a striker and it makes no sense to me to play him out on the right. Play garcia or kewell out right or give kromkamp some time out right. it reminds of what houllier did with diouf when he wasn't living up to his reputation. cisse is a striker, play him as a striker or don't play him at all. my preference would be the latter.

    I agree with you. I would play him every now again given the current forward line.

    redspider


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭redspider


    mike65 wrote:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/4832776.stm

    excerpts:

    Fan predicts 7-0 win on BBC site

    the 7-0 prediction would have netted odds of 100-1 from bookmaker William Hill.
    "Oddly enough, although we took a few bets of a fiver or less at 100/1 for the 7-0 result prior to kick-off, the biggest bets we took for the scoreline were placed during game via the internet," said Hill's spokesman Graham Sharpe.

    Thats a good one Mike. Coincidences do occur and this is a case in point. Its like that family that won the Lotto twice. They would have had to live for a billion years or something to win it twice by chance but they did it in less than 10 years. Such is the universe and probablility, chaos theory springs to mind.

    Also, the way some of the goals were predicted would make you wonder what the guy was "on" or realise that he was just being tongue-in-cheek:

    22 mins: Crouch with a 40-yard header
    46 mins: Reina scores from goal kick
    77 mins: Carragher gets his first goal in three years
    90 mins: Cisse out runs every Brum player to finish

    That combination would take a billion years to happen, surely!

    By the way, that wasnt you with a fiver bet, was it ??? ;-)

    As an aside, I had a feeling a week or so ago that Liverpool would win a match with a big scoreline. You know, one of those half hunches. I didnt act on it though.

    redspider


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭fade2black


    Got on Liverpool first half second half last night, gotta love an easy money betting opportunity. You'll be amazed at what hitting the back of the net can do for a player's confidence.

    7-0 though...who the hell could have predicted that (well apart from the guy Mike mentioned above - but if he had said that on here I would have given him a lashing of humour based abuse...a hypotecthical eating of hat is called for)

    Seriously though, I do have a disliking for soccer fans who are so one sided and biased that they must make themselves sick sometimes...but...that was a helluva result and kudos is deserved.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement