Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Protesters mount picket as Stardust pub opens again

124»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    the context in which the word site was used wasnt to make people think it was the same building but that it was on the same site.

    When the complex was being built it would have been* a building site. You can correctly call the complex a site.
    the fact that the buildings are so close together and part of the same complex of buildings means that they are on the same site.

    It is you who is just focusing on your definition. The word "site" was used correctly in the context it was written
    Let me correct you as somebody who studied buildings that is not correct. It was a site when being built afterwards it is no longer a site. The site of the fire was as shown. The pub is not part of the site of the fire and never every was the site of the stardust which most definitly implies it was built on the site of the fire.
    You said you agree to disagree so you can stop now. You made your point and repeating it is pointless as you are not illiminating the issue. They could have said beside or in the same building to be clear obviously the intent to mislead is there.
    Nobody said the night club opened in the same building was on the site of the Stardust so it is obvious spin.

    * past tense it no longer is the case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 286 ✭✭CoolGuy2006


    Let me correct you as somebody who studied buildings that is not correct. It was a site when being built afterwards it is no longer a site. The site of the fire was as shown. The pub is not part of the site of the fire and never every was the site of the stardust which most definitly implies it was built on the site of the fire.
    You said you agree to disagree so you can stop now. You made your point and repeating it is pointless as you are not illiminating the issue. They could have said beside or in the same building to be clear obviously the intent to mislead is there.
    Nobody said the night club opened in the same building was on the site of the Stardust so it is obvious spin.

    * past tense it no longer is the case.

    so is the dictionary i found this incorrect

    SITE"

    1. The place where a structure or GROUP OF STRUCTURES was, is, or is to be located: a good site for the school.

    take note of, WAS, IS, OR is to be

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=site


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    parsi wrote:
    I thought you worked in the Retail Trade ?
    IT serving retail after being an engineer


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    so is the dictionary i found this incorrect
    Yes I said that already. Dictionary.com is notoriously inaccurate.

    Find another defnition that does not just copy that one from another source and is English not American


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    OMG, what are you two like? Please someone be the bigger man and let this go. Haven’t you realised by now that neither of you is going to back down.

    Its like watching kids in a playground.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 5,904 ✭✭✭parsi


    yeah well he started it ;-)


    (just to get in ahead of the others..)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭Heinrich


    Get this pair on the Podge n' Rodge show. Fireworks guaranteed and no one left standing after the event.

    Anyone like to buy a kilo bag of freshly picked nits?:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 286 ✭✭CoolGuy2006


    Lol :-)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    You started all this :mad: *

    *i may not really be mad


Advertisement