Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Choices

Options
  • 26-04-2006 9:46pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 829 ✭✭✭


    Hi i just need a couple of comments.

    I'm gonna buy a car, i have 4500 quid to spend.

    I have the choice of...

    Skoda Fabia 70k miles. 1.4L 00'
    Alfa Romeo 156 - 1.8L 16V - 75K miles. 99'
    Seat Toledo 1.8 TDI - 80K Miles 99'
    Mazda 323F - 1.5L 85K miles 98'
    Toyota Corolla 85K miles 1.4L - 99'

    What do you think? I'm leaning towards the Skoda that my friend is selling, as it's newer and it's made by VW.

    thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    The Toledo's gona be the most economical.
    The Alfa's the looker
    The Fabia is the one with "low" mileage
    The 323F gives you reliability and looks
    The Corolla does the same as the Mazda, only without the looks.

    Fabia has no street cred
    Alfa will most likely break
    323f is older design than the others
    Corolla is probably poorly specced

    Depends on what you want from a car. I'd go for the 323f (presuming it's not the new type 98)


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    I'd go with the Corolla. Best all rounder - reliable in any uncanny way. Not a chance would I even consider the Alfa - unreliable and fall apart and rattle with age. I might risk a look at the Toledo mind.


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    I (contraversially) reckon the Mazda would be as reliable as the Corolla


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    colm_mcm wrote:
    I (contraversially) reckon the Mazda would be as reliable as the Corolla
    I couldn't agree more. But, the cost of Mazda parts is ridiculous. And while I haven't driven the Mazda 3, I have driven the 6 and they are not that well built inside. The dash is very 'plasticy' and seems loose and rattles somewhat. The steering on the 6 is a bit to light IMO. I would imagine the 3 has similar traits. Anyway a large portion of the car is Ford.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    the Mazda will be reliable but is more likely to go wrong than the Corolla. however I would not worry about the interior quality of the 323F which is muc better than the newer Mazda 6 which has 1970s Fiesta type dash plastic


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    ninty9er wrote:
    the newer Mazda 6 which has 1970s Fiesta type dash plastic
    Ain't that the truth!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 230 ✭✭phoenix_nights


    take the corolla. trouble free motoring, economical, cheap service. then with the money saved you can go for a nicer motor in a couple of years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 829 ✭✭✭Bartonprince


    The Fabia it is then....

    Look at the ad in the indipendant. Says they are the best car at the moment used.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭gyppo


    All good choices (although I'd reserve judgement on the Alfa - heard too many stories regarding reliability).

    Looking at the way fuel prices are, I'd go for the Toledo. Bulletproof VAG TDi engine, 50mpg plus is normal, well screwed together, and a nice drive. If its the 110 model, all the better. Just make sure the cambelt has been done - if not its expensive to do, but not a patch on the future expense you might have, if it isnt.

    Id go with colm on the mazda for a 2nd choice. Very reliable, and you will probably have a better spec than the corolla (also an excellent car).


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,724 ✭✭✭Dilbert75


    I'm currently driving a 00 Fabia 1.4 while I'm looking for a car for myself. I've a 20 mile run to work every day, 19 miles of it open roads, and the car is returning around 46mpg. I find it a grand car, steering is a bit light but its torquey enough to be a comfortable drive. And my mother's owned it for over two years and its been faultless, so I'd have no question about reliability.

    I would be interested, however, in a 99 Toledo diesel for less than €5k - that should be a good car too, though the extra tax & insurance will eat up your fuel savings.

    Finally, had a 180 mile round trip to Mondello on Sunday in a 156 2.0l. A well cared-for car but impressively free of rattles, squeaks and foibles.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭Conar


    Hello there.
    I have a 00 Fabia with less mileage going for 4250 ono.
    See thread:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054923857&highlight=fabia

    As mentioned in the thread it has some electrical fault but other than that its a great car.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 829 ✭✭✭Bartonprince


    Conar wrote:
    Hello there.
    I have a 00 Fabia with less mileage going for 4250 ono.
    See thread:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054923857&highlight=fabia

    As mentioned in the thread it has some electrical fault but other than that its a great car.

    I may have managed to secure a 00 Fabia with only 28k miles on it for 4700. lovely car.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 829 ✭✭✭Bartonprince


    Dilbert75 wrote:
    I'm currently driving a 00 Fabia 1.4 while I'm looking for a car for myself. I've a 20 mile run to work every day, 19 miles of it open roads, and the car is returning around 46mpg. I find it a grand car, steering is a bit light but its torquey enough to be a comfortable drive. And my mother's owned it for over two years and its been faultless, so I'd have no question about reliability.

    I would be interested, however, in a 99 Toledo diesel for less than €5k - that should be a good car too, though the extra tax & insurance will eat up your fuel savings.

    Finally, had a 180 mile round trip to Mondello on Sunday in a 156 2.0l. A well cared-for car but impressively free of rattles, squeaks and foibles.

    Is the one you have the 8v or the 16v engine?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,724 ✭✭✭Dilbert75


    8V - see my response on the other thread


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    The Fabia it is then....

    Look at the ad in the indipendant. Says they are the best car at the moment used.

    Is this Skoda saying that the Fabia is the best used car at the moment........


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,579 ✭✭✭junkyard


    I'd buy the Mazda, even though parts are expensive you don't need to replace them very often and most of the parts are available spurious for a car of this age. The Corolla would be my second choice but I wouldn't touch the Skoda tbh. Anything made by VW at the moment of recent past is rubbish and too complex in my opinion. VW seem to have taken simple parts i.e. door lock and electrics and made them too complicated for their own good and the result is unreliability.


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    junkyard wrote:
    I'd buy the Mazda, even though parts are expensive you don't need to replace them very often and most of the parts are available spurious for a car of this age. The Corolla would be my second choice but I wouldn't touch the Skoda tbh. Anything made by VW at the moment of recent past is rubbish and too complex in my opinion. VW seem to have taken simple parts i.e. door lock and electrics and made them too complicated for their own good and the result is unreliability.

    Agreed 100%


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭Conar


    Superb, Fabia, and Octavia in that order were the only non-jap cars to feature in the top 10 in the Top Gear user survey.

    Just so ya know! :D


Advertisement