Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Most Pointless cars on sale

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭cianclarke


    The Nissan Cube!!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,407 ✭✭✭G Luxel


    Toyota Yaris Verso: This (out of production for 9 months) car

    yep, but replaced by new car called the Ractis and there is also a yaris
    saloon called the belta, very nice looking but as usual for 3 box tiny cars
    not available here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,414 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    colm_mcm wrote:
    I think you're not giving hybrids a fair go
    colm_mcm wrote:
    BTW a prius emits about 30% less CO2 than a BMW 320D

    What kinda comparison is that? :confused:

    A small family car like a Prius (78BHP, 115NM, 0-100 in 11s) for sure can't be compared with a junior executive saloon like a BMW 320d (163bhp, 340NM, 0-100 in 8s)


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    unkel wrote:
    What kinda comparison is that? :confused:

    A small family car like a Prius (78BHP, 115NM, 0-100 in 11s) for sure can't be compared with a junior executive saloon like a BMW 320d (163bhp, 340NM, 0-100 in 8s)

    fair enough. it emits 30% less CO2 than a BMW 118d or a 407 1.6 HDI.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    unkel wrote:
    What kinda comparison is that? :confused:

    A small family car like a Prius (78BHP, 115NM, 0-100 in 11s) for sure can't be compared with a junior executive saloon like a BMW 320d (163bhp, 340NM, 0-100 in 8s)


    Actually the BMW would be less powerful. Going on the conversation I had with Cllr. John Ryan former Mayor of Limerick. He was the first Mayor of Limerick to have a Prius having switched from the Saab 9-5 and said on the open road the Prius was as if not more peppy than the 9-5 2.0


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    ninty9er wrote:
    Actually the BMW would be less powerful. Going on the conversation I had with Cllr. John Ryan former Mayor of Limerick. He was the first Mayor of Limerick to have a Prius having switched from the Saab 9-3 and said on the open road the Prius was as if not more peppy than the 9-3 2.0

    In fairness, the Prius isn't overly quick. unless the 2.0 he had was non turbo and very old, the Toyota'd hardly be much quicker and the 320D would be far quicker.

    Oh and BTW unkel. the bhp figure you quoted wasn't including the electric motor which generates 67hp @ 1200rpm


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    It would have been a 03 saab 9-5 not 9-3 sorry. he said there was no noticible difference.


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    ninty9er wrote:
    It would have been a 03 saab 9-5 not 9-3 sorry. he said there was no noticible difference.

    He's probably a bit mental so!
    The Prius is fine. just no more powerful than a 1.8 Avensis mid range. Any 9-5 I've driven has been notacibly quick


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,414 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    colm_mcm wrote:
    Oh and BTW unkel. the bhp figure you quoted wasn't including the electric motor which generates 67hp @ 1200rpm

    Yep you're right there. So technically we're talking 78bhp from the petrol engine plus 67bhp from the electric motor, totalling 145bhp

    Any small family car (diesel or petrol) with 145bhp would do 0-100km/h a lot quicker than 11 seconds. I guess things don't really add up for the Prius (or any hybrid for that matter) ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    You can't really just add one to the other, as they both peak at different rpms.

    do you reckon hybrids are pie in the sky nonsense that'll never take off?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 65,414 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    colm_mcm wrote:
    do you reckon hybrids are pie in the sky nonsense that'll never take off?

    No that would be harsh and unfair. I've a lot of respect for Toyota (and Honda) not for inventing the hybrid or pioneering it (they did neither) but for actually bringing it to the market as a serious (and green) alternative to petrol only cars. With the right fiscal regime, these cars could have been owned for no more money than same size / performance petrol cars, especially with big saving measures such as no/lower VRT or congestion charge exemptions, etc.

    But then there was the European diesel revolution that took Toyota and Honda completely by surprise. You can't really blame them because their main markets were Japan and the US, where diesel still is very unpopular. They missed out completely and are only very recently, desparately and quickly trying to catch up

    Having said all that, I believe that bio diesel cars are the most eco friendly mass produced car for the near future (next 5-10 years) and perhaps also ethanol fuelled petrol cars. For right now, it can only be modern diesels

    I do see a role for some of the technology of current hybrids in those cars though, but perhaps not with as big an electro motor (if any) and battery system


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,455 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    We'll have to wait and see how it pans out


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭commited


    Any 4x4 not bought by farmers
    Pick ups not bought by builders
    MPVs bought by families with less than 3 kids

    Ford Fusion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,414 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    colm_mcm wrote:
    We'll have to wait and see how it pans out

    Absolutely. Hydrogen has been a lot slower to progress compared to what was expected a few years ago, so indeed we'll just have to wait and see. A lot will also depend on fiscal measures. Just a wee current example of the latter in the form of excise differences:

    Ireland:

    diesel €1.16/l
    petrol €1.17/l

    Netherlands

    diesel €1.02/l
    petrol €1.40/l

    This difference has a big impact on people choosing new cars


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭weemcd


    i might get slammed for this, and i actually love the cars to a point, but when you look at it on paper. r32 golfs? whats the point? you can buy yourself so much more space, comfort and spec for the money. It is a golf at the end of the day. Don't get me wrong, ive seen two in the flesh and thought they were nice, but in a rather you than me kinda way. Anyone else agree, or am i missing something? the original gti hot hatch image is no longer appliable to young male drivers (surley their first target audience all those years ago?) and the r32 is even further out of reach. It seems to me as if the only people who could realisitically afford a gti or r32 would be those who had a mk 2 all those years ago and want to relive their youth. does therin lie the market?

    blindingly fast golf's aside. The smart roadster. why? an mx-5, mr 2 or celica to a lesser extent will bring you so much more joy and won't seem such a terrible mistake. The original smart had its place, small, affordable easy to park city car, a roadster though? laughable imo, though i heard they are out of production :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭JohnBoy


    as for all the talk of the prius emitting 30% less c02, whopee

    what about all the lovely deadly nasty stuff that goes into the batteries, since when have batteries been nice?

    esp rechargable ones?

    sure it emits less pollution while driving, but how much more pollution does it generate in manufacture and disposal?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭Mc-BigE


    Rodius :eek:

    Pointlessly ugly.

    have to agree, i want a car to drive , not a car to be driven...to the graveyard!

    Funeral Companies would like this car!

    http://www.parkers.co.uk/pricing/used_car/valuation.aspx?deriv=31459&model=1400&plate=80&pay=false&buyorsell=buy

    http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/carreviews/gallery/?model_id=1400&category=Main%20image


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 258 ✭✭smarty


    weemcd wrote:
    The smart roadster. why? an mx-5, mr 2 or celica to a lesser extent will bring you so much more joy and won't seem such a terrible mistake. The original smart had its place, small, affordable easy to park city car, a roadster though? laughable imo, though i heard they are out of production :)

    Just wondering whether you have you ever driven a smart roadster?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭weemcd


    of course not :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    smarty wrote:
    Just wondering whether you have you ever driven a smart roadster?
    I actually booked one for a test drive once, when it was just newly available.

    Didn't get to drive it though ...couldn't fit in ..not with the roof closed anyway ...and I'm only 6'1" and a bit:D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 258 ✭✭smarty


    peasant wrote:
    I actually booked one for a test drive once, when it was just newly available.

    Didn't get to drive it though ...couldn't fit in ..not with the roof closed anyway ...and I'm only 6'1" and a bit:D

    That seems a bit odd. Jeremy Clarkson is 6' 4" and he had no problem getting in, or driving it. :confused:

    There is a lot more room in the roadster than there is in a Lotus Elise, and it is a lot more dignified trying to get in or out of the roadster.

    I drive a brabus roadster coupe and it is surprisingly practical. I can fit my gym bag and laptop into the front boot, and I can actually fit a set of golf clubs into the rear boot. It has a 698cc engine, but it puts out 101bhp and it weighs half nothing, so it is surprisingly nippy too.


Advertisement