Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2nd year politics exams

Options
  • 08-05-2006 2:16pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭


    OK the 2nd year politics exam is tomorrow and there's one again on Thurday. Anyone have any tips on what to go over? Anything that's worth looking over for those who have left things to the last minute? (ahem)

    The similar thread on history really helped me out so hopefully someone out there has some nuggets of wisdom to impart!

    I'm looking at you beanyb cos I know you do politics. :D


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    Ok, I hope I can help! So much pressure! :)

    For tomorrow I've covered Machiavelli and Locke. If you're doing Machiavelli know the corruption stuff pretty well, because every year there seems to be a question that can be twisted to corruption if it's not on corruption specifically.

    With Locke I just read through loads of it and it's pretty easy really. If you're really screwed read his section of the power of the legislative and it should get you through, hopefully!!

    For IR, I've covered neo-realism, dem peace theory and interdependence. DPT and interdependence are really easy. Dont just learn neo-realism because he kind of told us that it wasnt going to be on it. I just learnt it because I'd done my essay on it and it's good for criticisms of the other theories.

    Thursday, though it's a horrible subject the exam should be fairly ok because he told us what was coming up. Ontology, epistemology and methodology for the 3 main schools, though personally I'm staying away from that one! I did an essay on anti-naturalism vs naturalism and he said that'd be there too. Other things were structure vs agency and institutions vs ideas. I think that was all anyway.

    For the second section he pretty much told us the question. Is the distinction between qualitative and quantitative a false dichotomy? There's a section in the book on it and it's fairly easy. If it doesnt come up I'm screwed!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 Zephead


    Theory
    Freedom or corruption for Macheavelli

    Hobbes- State of Nature or the social contract

    IR
    Democratic Peace Theory
    Theories of Aggression
    Integration Theories

    Research
    Naturalism vs Anti Naturalism
    Structure vs. Agency
    Qual vs. Quant
    Research Design

    Comparative
    Cleavages
    Families of Parties
    Parliament


    Best of luck with the exams!


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Thanks beanyb but just one question - I'm pretty good when it comes to Hobbes so I'd prefer to focus on him. Is he going to be on the exam for definite?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    Oh yeah, there's 2 questions on every theorist.


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Thanks again. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭jazzy_jeff


    Does anyone have any ideas on what would be good to study for the Post communist Russia and the non democratic regimes papers?? I keep telling myself i work better under pressure...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    Yeah those courses are really annoying alright, not to mention power, discourse and political action! Really wish I hadnt picked that one...

    For non-dem regimes I've so far done totalitarianism and authoritarianism. I might do the future of non-dem regimes too but I'm not sure yet.

    For Russia I really dont know, I might email him and ask because I'm totally confused about it, even though it's such an easy course!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,391 ✭✭✭arbeitsscheuer


    Really off-topic, but here's my courses/results from 2nd Politics, Autumn 2005:
    Political Theory and International Relations = 59%
    Political Research = 48%
    Comparative Politics = 53%
    Democratic Theory = 5%
    Power, Discourse, Political Action = 45%
    British Politics = 56%
    Tutorials = 27%

    Overall Grade = 44% PASS

    Anyway, without basking to much in the glow of gettin just 5% in an exam and somehow passing the year, this is what I crammed - I mean, studied.

    Political Theory:
    Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau

    IR:
    Neorealism

    Political Research:
    Naturalism vs Anti-Naturalism
    Structure vs Agency
    Qualitative vs Quantitative

    Comparative:
    Lipset&Rokkan
    Electoral Systems
    Party Systems

    Democratic Theory:
    You wouldn't take the advice of someone who got 5% in this, would you?:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭tintinr35


    seem to have covered the same stuff as u Beanyb....ugggghhhhh im still kinda ****ed tho..its goin to be a long night ill tell ya that!! if i dont see u tomorrow best of luck!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭GusherING


    I was under the impression that Tobias would have a question comparing/contrasting DPT and Neo-Realism. Neo-Realism definitely won't be on its own though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    Yeah, that's what I meant when I said it'd be useful for criticisms. Hopefully he does because that would be the world's sweetest question!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭tintinr35


    ya he mentioned it about 4 times in the last lecture alright, if it doesnt come up im screwed cause its all im doin!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    I thought today's exam was grand. I was delighted with how I did. Beforehand I was worried about not coming up with anything to write but then I saw me oul' mate Tommy Hobbes on the paper and I was away. I was surprised at the range of choice offered this year too.

    That neorealism question was handy eh?

    I'm dreading Thursday though. :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Jonny Arson


    ^ eh that's two exams in a row you've done well in Mr. ''I'm going to fail all of my exams'' Guy.... you're not living up to your reputation! ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    ^ eh that's two exams in a row you've done well in Mr. ''I'm going to fail all of my exams'' Guy.... you're not living up to your reputation! ;)

    I'm trying to not get too excited about things because I'm sure I'm going to be marked badly for attendance, essays etc. but I must say I'm surprised at how I've done in the actual exams. The advice given on here has been most helpful. If I am to fail at least I will have went down fighting. ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭tintinr35


    ya that was a really fair exam everything i had preped came up....could have done really wellhad i studied more.....story of my life!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭jazzy_jeff


    Does anybody know what layout the research paper on thursday will be? is it going to be like last year with 1 long question from section A and 3 short from section B? Or like previous years with one long question on each section?


  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭GusherING


    Two sections. Answer 1 from each. Section A is on the theory, eg. ontology, epistemeology, methodology, the different paradigms (eg. Rational Choice, Structuralism etc.), Strcucture-Agency etc.

    Section B is on methods: quantitative and qualitiative, triangulation, false dichotomy etc.

    Todays exam was grand. I had Neo-Realism well prepared but I thought the Political Economy Essay was just too easy and tempting so I aced it!! So glad I covered it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    It's 2 essays, one from each section. There are sample questions on blackboard.

    Today's exam was pretty good alright! I did the neo-realism one, was pretty good!


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    What can I say? I'm delighted with how today went. Chuffed to bits. I studied Structure vs Agency and quantitative versus qualitative and both were there. I just kept writing and writing.

    I'm trying not to get too carried away with things as I know I left myself with an uphill batle through my lack of essays and tutorial attendance but I feel like I'm still in with a chance of avoiding failure with these exams.

    Thanks again to the people on this thread for their tips, particularly beanyb.

    Keep hope alive! :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    Wasnt it a great paper? I was so afraid before we got it because it could have gone so badly wrong, but it went brilliantly!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭tintinr35


    ya i mean i had two things studied the naturalism/anti naturalism debate and the quants and qual thing!!

    they have been really fair so far no complaints anyway!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭jazzy_jeff


    So... any hints for paper 3 anyone?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭tintinr35


    Electoral System
    Votor Volatility and Voter Alignment
    Clevage structures and electoral change (lipset and rokkan etc)


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    How hard was that exam today? Janey Mac. :eek:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭tintinr35


    really, everything i said in my previous post came up!!! i heard a load of people say it was really hard but i didnt think it was that bad!!

    what u all doin for P4??


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    Yeah I didnt think it was that bad either. It's pretty much the same paper every year. My answers were pretty waffly at times though.

    I'm absolutely dreading paper 4. Have no idea what to study for Post-Communist Russia even though the course was so easy. He gave no real info on what the hell kind of things he'd be asking. I even emailed him looking for a bit of help, but he was just as unhelpful! Most of Power, Discourse and Political Action went totally over my head too, so I'm kinda lost on that front too. ARGH!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Can you get notes for P4 in the Student Union? I'm thinking of going in to UCD tomorrow so I might see what I can get. I too am dreading P4.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭tintinr35


    in the Post communists Russia one im going to do somthing about presidential power and the constitution cause he spent ages on that one!!

    Democratic theory haven a clue

    Non democratic Regimes: Military dictatorships, authoritarinism vs totalinarism

    im kinda ****ed too tho as ive an exam today and saturday so dnt really have time to study for it!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭Stargal


    Sorry to drop in in the middle of this, but it is true that there's a 75% failure rate for 2nd year politics? My boyfriend's little brother is doing it, and he's been studying his ass off cos he's so worried about not passing it.


Advertisement