first report of crack /drugs being sold in dublin

fits

bounty wrote:

damm it must be true, you mean, he actually said that!

yeah and he's always right...

bounty wrote:

:
yea arrogant and self obsessed is a good way to describe someone on coke, apparently it causes your brain to make more dopamine (my source on this is same as fits's, of course )

the thing that makes it such a shjtty drug is how short the buzz lasts, and its so bloody expensive

now weed, theres a drug of choice (once your finished school), its so cheap (stuff literally grows on trees), it makes sex and food great, and the buzz is funny and long lasting

I think I must be getting old.. not into the weed much anymore either. Definitely nice after a good few pints, but can leave it the rest of the time. I do miss clubs full of people on good e. That was fun.

AngryAnderson

fits wrote:

I never said there was. And the hype and sensationalism I was referring to was in the case of New York. You should read up on it...

Heres a link to a really great book. Its easy to read and well researched.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0753506270/qid=1147551851/sr=1-5/ref=sr_1_3_5/026-0576156-5247651

Like I said. Stop being patronising and telling me to 'read up on it'... I don't need to. When you actually get some 'life experience' you'll realise that telling people to 'read up on things' that you yourself know nothing about is nothing short of humiliating. Thankfully the anonimity internet protects against such character destruction.

fits

AngryAnderson wrote:

Have you done much of it?

you can make your own judgement on that (sounds like you already have)

AngryAnderson

fits wrote:

you can make your own judgement on that (sounds like you already have)

No, just wondering. All your posts smack, hilariously, of sheer and utter ignorance.

fits

AngryAnderson wrote:

Like I said. Stop being patronising and telling me to 'read up on it'... I don't need to. When you actually get some 'life experience' you'll realise that telling people to 'read up on things' that you yourself know nothing about is nothing short of humiliating. Thankfully the anonimity internet protects against such character destruction.

Oh whatever... the only person being patronising is you, and you're making judgements on me that are seriously wide of the mark. If you feel you know everything you need to know dont bother reading it, your experiences have obviously been different to mine.

Chucky the tree

Judging by your posts anderson, you seem to of done alot of the stuff yourself.

AngryAnderson

fits wrote:

Oh whatever... the only person being patronising is you, and you're making judgements on me that are seriously wide of the mark. If you feel you know everything you need to know dont bother reading it, your experiences have obviously been different to mine.

Um, no. It was you who was being patronising. I was simply calling you up on it. Go back and read the thread again.

AngryAnderson

Chucky the tree wrote:

Judging by your posts anderson, you seem to of done alot of the stuff yourself.

Years of experience with narcotics in a certain capacity, yes. Not necessarily consuming them though.

fits

Hey Angry, dunno why I'm bothering to reply to you. Everything I've posted is based on an opinion I've formed as a direct result of my own experiences, those of a very close friend, or gleaned from that cocaine book which I posted a link to. They are my opinion, obviously you dont agree with my opinions, you dont have to. Theres no need to attack me personally over it.

This is way off topic now, so what do you have to say about crack or coke in general? If you post your own point of view instead of attacking me, the thread might be the better for it.

Chucky the tree

AngryAnderson wrote:

Years of experience with narcotics in a certain capacity, yes. Not necessarily consuming them though.

thought so. the agressive way you try and force accross your point was a bit of a give away to the fact that your found of the white stuff.

AngryAnderson

Chucky the tree wrote:

thought so. the agressive way you try and force accross your point was a bit of a give away to the fact that your found of the white stuff.

Nah, never touched it. Blows your assertion out of the water a bit there, doesn't it?

AngryAnderson

fits wrote:

Hey Angry, dunno why I'm bothering to reply to you. Everything I've posted is based on an opinion I've formed as a direct result of my own experiences, those of a very close friend, or gleaned from that cocaine book which I posted a link to. They are my opinion, obviously you dont agree with my opinions, you dont have to. Theres no need to attack me personally over it.

This is way off topic now, so what do you have to say about crack or coke in general? If you post your own point of view instead of attacking me, the thread might be the better for it.

Hmm, yeah. I don't know why I'm bothering to reply to you either. As for making a personal attack on you, I haven't. I've simply pointed out that you don't know what you're talking about as you resorted to the old 'read up on it' retort... and then you go on to say that these are matters of opinion and not fact. You're all over the place. Let's let sleeping dogs lie. We'll all just agree that crack is overhyped and not addictive.

Civilian_Target

Can you all stop talking now and pass me the bendy spoon?

bounty

AngryAnderson wrote:

Hmm, yeah. I don't know why I'm bothering to reply to you either. As for making a personal attack on you, I haven't. I've simply pointed out that you don't know what you're talking about as you resorted to the old 'read up on it' retort... and then you go on to say that these are matters of opinion and not fact. You're all over the place. Let's let sleeping dogs lie. We'll all just agree that crack is overhyped and not addictive.

"not addictive" LOL

AngryAnderson is very angry

WhiteWashMan

keep it family kids.
discuss the topic, not scoring points over easch other.

AngryAnderson

bounty wrote:

"not addictive" LOL

AngryAnderson is very angry

Yeah, good one! Read thread. Spot sarcasm.