Train Drivers Strike

NavanJunction1

Drivers criticise deficient Irish Rail training
Olivia Kelleher, Irish Times, 16/05/2006

Train drivers in Cork insisted yesterday they didn't "down tools" and go on strike but were instead forced into a situation where they couldn't carry out their duties because they weren't adequately trained to operate a new fleet of trains.


Iarnród Éireann had planned to bring the first of the new €117 million order of Intercity Mark 4 trains into service for trials on the Cork-Dublin route yesterday at 5.30am.

However, Ken Collins, a driver at Kent Station in Cork, said he and his colleagues refused to operate the train because they hadn't received adequate training on new procedures and a new safety regime.

"Iarnród Éireann decided to put on a Mark 4 train and our driver said he wasn't qualified to drive it," said Mr Collins. "We had one day's introductory training in Limerick. That is all we have had. Even the company agreed we needed more training. So we said we weren't prepared to drive the train. But we were willing to drive our regular trains. We asked to defer the introduction of the new train until a planned meeting tomorrow, but they flatly refused to do so."

Mr Collins, a train driver for 20 years, said his workmates were concerned about the lack of a code of practice on the new line. He said he couldn't understand how the company planned to operate a new service when drivers weren't up to speed on all aspects of safety and procedure. Issues surrounding guards and the maintenance team also needed to be discussed, he said.

Train drivers in Cork submitted a claim last autumn for increased pay and reduced working hours in return for driving the new fleet of trains.

However, the claim was rejected by the Labour Court in January who said the new working arrangements were allowed for in previous agreements. Negotiations are continuing on other issues relating to extra money for agreeing to more stringent monitoring of driver standards and for coaching trainee drivers.

Mr Collins said drivers in Cork were looking for a reduction in the working week, from 43.5 hours plus two contingency hours, to a 35-hour week.

He insisted the reduction in the working week wasn't anything out of the ordinary, saying his colleagues across the UK and Europe only worked about 30 hours a week.

Mr Collins described Iarnród Éireann's management style as being like something from another era, adding it was time for the company to reassess its attitude towards staff.

He accused the company of causing the dispute by not delaying the introduction of the new rolling stock until unions and management had ironed out their differences.

"The public only get to see Iarnród Éireann management style when something like this happens. It is all part of the old bureaucracy and, quite frankly, things need to change."

Mr Collins said staff were prepared to drive the regular Mark 3 trains, but that Iarnród Éireann refused to allow them to do so.

Meanwhile, Dermot O'Leary, of the National Bus and Rail Union, who oversees 54 train drivers in Cork, said Iarnród Éireann needed to take responsibility for yesterday's disruption. Mr O'Leary said it was important to note that a meeting had been planned for this morning between management/drivers and an independent facilitator. He said they had asked Iarnród Éireann on Sunday night to defer the introduction of the new Mark 4 line pending that meeting, a request which he described as "reasonable".

Iarnród Éireann insist that the drivers in Cork are capable of manning the new trains and say that other drivers elsewhere in the country have no problem with driving the new fleet.

© The Irish Times

NavanJunction1

Olivia Kelleher and Leah McBride, Irish Times, 16/05/2006

Tourists, students, Polish workers and children on school tours were among the thousands of rail passengers who had their travel plans disrupted due to yesterday's rail strike.


Student Bibal Hussein (17), who completed her final exam at St John's College, Cork, turned up at Kent Station to find she wouldn't be able to get back to her native Ennis, Co Clare, by train, while Cork legal secretary Tracy Harper was due in Dublin at 11am to present vital documentation in a number of deportation cases.

Meanwhile, Helen O'Neill, from Raheny, Dublin, who was in Cork for the weekend, said her trip had been ruined by the prospect of taking a bus home. Nora O'Brien from Navan, Co Meath, also said she dreaded the prospect of taking the bus, as it meant she wouldn't get home until about 6pm.

One man from Cobh in his 50s said he could not get home to get clothes and insurance information for his partner who had fallen the night before and was now in Cork University Hospital.

"I don't know what I am going to do if this goes on all week, as I will have to be in and out to her all the time, " he said

Polish national Christopher Guminski, (25), who works in a shop in Little Island on the outskirts of Cork, was philosophical about yesterday's disruption, saying he understood that "everyone needs more money".

Mr Guminski said he was surprised by the strike, but said industrial action was nothing new to Poland. He added that it didn't matter if he got to work by train or bus as long as he arrived in one piece.

Taxi drivers who sat in the rain at Kent Station awaiting fares that never materialised said they were very aggrieved by the dispute.

Billy Murphy, from Ballyvolane, Cork, said he might as well have stayed in bed yesterday morning as taxi business was down by up to 75 per cent.

"We didn't know this strike was going to happen. It would have been a help if they told us before. Iarnród Éireann say they put the information on their website but we are not acclimatised to websites. The bottom line is that this is a disaster."

Meanwhile, passengers waiting at Heuston Station in Dublin said they were annoyed as they waited for alternate transport. Dr Frances Doyle was in Dublin for a meeting and was told by station officials there was a 90 per cent chance a bus would arrive to take her to Kilkenny an hour and a half after her train had been scheduled to leave.

Dr Doyle said she asked if her train ticket would be refunded if the bus did not show up. "They just said they're 90 per cent sure a bus will come and did not answer the question," she said.

© The Irish Times

NavanJunction1

NavanJunction1 wrote:

Nora O'Brien from Navan, Co Meath, also said she dreaded the prospect of taking the bus, as it meant she wouldn't get home until about 6pm.

:rolleyes:

Red Alert

Barry Kenny and his men have a lot to answer for. The important thing is having a train as opposed to no train. I'd prefer a Mark 3 rather than a bus.

The company clearly just has its PR (let's have the photographers here for the Mk4) interests at heart here. If it cared about its fare paying customers it would have put a train that the driver would drive back on the route. The board are foolish if they think the public will hold out for the Mark 4.

MarkoP11

IE are running around like a headless chicken there PR man the always cool Baz Kenny disappeared, I know where he is and he ain't in the jurisdiction . IE management haven't surfaced, CIE board have said nothing, no sign of Cullen

There is a slight problem at the moment as in IE don't have enough MK3 sets. The 5:30 ex Cork this morning would have been a MK3 set it didn't run, Galway drivers also walked off the job.

Everyone knows its got nothing to do with the new trains, its just a very visable and expensive wedge.

Drivers in Cork decided en mass not to drive the train, they claim lack of training now (different story last week) In fact Cork drivers refused an offer to take the new train out on the weekend for further familiarisation. The control console is indentical to the existing locomotives which the drivers have driven for 12 years, the locomotive on the rear is the same one

popebenny16

Here is todays news, lets nitpick the irish times article, shall we?

Lets start here:

However, Ken Collins, a driver at Kent Station in Cork, said he and his colleagues refused to operate the train because they hadn't received adequate training on new procedures and a new safety regime.

"Iarnród Éireann decided to put on a Mark 4 train and our driver said he wasn't qualified to drive it," said Mr Collins. "We had one day's introductory training in Limerick. That is all we have had. Even the company agreed we needed more training. So we said we weren't prepared to drive the train. But we were willing to drive our regular trains. We asked to defer the introduction of the new train until a planned meeting tomorrow, but they flatly refused to do so."

Firstly, the locomotice being used on these trains is the standard 201 class with a nice new colour scheme. The other end, nice and pointy, has a REPLICA cabin. Why would they need more training? Secondly "we were willing to drive our regular train" FACT: the Mk4 train was to leave Dublin at 9.00am yesterday and come back sometime aftre 13,00 (dont know the schedule). EVERY OTHER TRAIN IS A REGUALR TRAIN. So why are these trains not running?

Next:

Mr Collins, a train driver for 20 years, said his workmates were concerned about the lack of a code of practice on the new line.

What New Line? It is the same line, and in fact, the exact same regualar 9.00am and return service stopping at all the stops at the same time as ever.

Next:

He said he couldn't understand how the company planned to operate a new service when drivers weren't up to speed on all aspects of safety and procedure.

What new service? See above.

Next:

He accused the company of causing the dispute by not delaying the introduction of the new rolling stock until unions and management had ironed out their differences.

They were due to go into service last december and have already been postponed a number of times.

Next:

Mr Collins said staff were prepared to drive the regular Mark 3 trains, but that Iarnród Éireann refused to allow them to do so.

Every other train scheduled for Cork/Dublin yeaterday and today is a Mk3. This also doesnt explain why the Trains to and from Limerick, Waterford, Tralee, Galway and Mayo have been stopped and why all commuter trains also have been stoped.

Lastly:

He said they had asked Iarnród Éireann on Sunday night to defer the introduction of the new Mark 4 line pending that meeting, a request which he described as "reasonable".

It is not a line, see above.

If you knew nothing about this situation, readin the Union's veriosn of events would make you believe, based on the above article, the following:

1. There is a new line.
2. There are new trains running on that line.
3. Managment want to put your life in danger by forcing drivers who are not trained to use these new trains on this new line operate them
4. The drivers will, if IE allow them to, drive other trains.


But why?

paulm17781

Where they say line I would think they mean new line of trains.

Other than that I agree with you.

popebenny16

Well, this is what a driver is saying. Hands up out there how many drivers call their train a line?

Or a rake?

Hummmmmmm.....................

i71jskz5xu42pb

MarkoP11 wrote:

Everyone knows its got nothing to do with the new trains, its just a very visable and expensive wedge.

Agreed.

Remember the Dart drivers and their new trains (not even new trains, just 2 extra carriages)

paulm17781

popebenny16 wrote:

Well, this is what a driver is saying. Hands up out there how many drivers call their train a line?

Or a rake?

Hummmmmmm.....................

Line: a particular kind of product or merchandise; "a nice line of shoes"

It is not uncommon use line for this purpose.

popebenny16

Yeah, but i mean that it would be most unusual for a driver of 20 years to call it that.

Champ

Anybody here thinks that if they get their pay increase and 35 hour week that they'll suddenly have no problem operating the new trains without the much sought after training?:rolleyes:

Really if there's a basis for striking when your working more than 35 hrs a week i'd reckon almost everyone i know would be eligible to do it.:D

I use to be pro public transport run by the public sector on the basis that a public service would be decimated if it was privatised (i.e. profit before service), but this is ridiculous. This situation is just an example of greed spinning out of control. For example if my boss got me newer, modern equipment to replace out of date ones then i'd be happy and more than willing to adjust to any changes. Likewise if i turned around and said i'm going on strike unless x conditions are met, he'd be equally shocked and surprised not to mention just as fast to give me the boot;).

popebenny16

Funny you should say that, Champ.

My boss has decided to upgrade my pc from windowsME to XP and replace my Dell with a Packard Bell.

What should I do?

Metrobest

popebenny16. wrote:

What should I do?

Demand lots of extra training to help you click the new high-tech mouse, an extra 5% in your pay packet and a reduction in your working hours in favour of a French-style 35 hour week. When your boss turns you down, make sure you get all your colleagues to go on a sympathy strike with you. Then get on to your buddies in RTE and The Irish Times and make sure your story of persecution is heard. :rolleyes:

popebenny16

Metrobest wrote:

Demand lots of extra training to help you click the new high-tech mouse, an extra 5% in your pay packet and a reduction in your working hours in favour of a French-style 35 hour week. When your boss turns you down, make sure you get all your colleagues to go on a sympathy strike with you. Then get on to your buddies in RTE and The Irish Times and make sure your story of persecution is heard. :rolleyes:

I love it when a plan comes together!

Champ

What should I do?

The sane thing would be to thank your boss:D XP is generally quite an improvement over ME not to consider the improved hardware that would come with it;)

Likewise my boss got me extra hardware to install when i had to upgrade my station for new duties. Taking a page from the IE drivers i might have barked as (1) Preping up a machine with both new hardware and software isn't in my normal duties (2) I would be using a fairly new station that would allow me to be more productive as well as wipe out a few headaches with the upgrades. Honestly though i'd feel embarassed following the IE lead as the work is really just the same with some improvements that were long advocated to be more efficent. Not to mention it was actually nice to get to use some fairly recent advances in IT;).

popebenny16

"I would be using a fairly new station"

Did you really have to say that????

AdrianR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metrobest
Demand lots of extra training to help you click the new high-tech mouse, an extra 5% in your pay packet and a reduction in your working hours in favour of a French-style 35 hour week. When your boss turns you down, make sure you get all your colleagues to go on a sympathy strike with you. Then get on to your buddies in RTE and The Irish Times and make sure your story of persecution is heard.



I love it when a plan comes together!

Oh! And make sure your work collegues won't drive their old computers either!

Champ

"I would be using a fairly new station"

If you like i could rephrase it as "due course upgrades that came with the fullness of time";)

Transport21 Fan

The CIE train drivers really are a parody of themselves. One could be forgiven that they are trying hard to usher in privatisation of the rail network by making everybody turn against them.

What can you say really that hasn't been said a thousand times beforer about these greedy knucklescrapers.

Transport21 Fan

Metrobest wrote:

Demand lots of extra training to help you click the new high-tech mouse, an extra 5% in your pay packet and a reduction in your working hours in favour of a French-style 35 hour week. When your boss turns you down, make sure you get all your colleagues to go on a sympathy strike with you. Then get on to your buddies in RTE and The Irish Times and make sure your story of persecution is heard. :rolleyes:

Brilliant.

popebenny16

and then spend your evenings on IRN getting love letters of support from fellas who are gay for train drivers and have not figured it out yet.

Oh sweet jesus that is just brillo!!! I nearly choked laughing at it.

Leave IRN alone.

When the Special from Waterford to Knock (yes, I'n not joking) gets cancelled because of this they'll go nuts!

Zulu

It a disgrace. They should get the sack.

Transport21 Fan

popebenny16 wrote:

Oh sweet jesus that is just brillo!!! I nearly choked laughing at it.

Leave IRN alone.

When the Special from Waterford to Knock (yes, I'n not joking) gets cancelled because of this they'll go nuts!

Or their beloved rural branch lines "services" to Ballybrophy and Limerick-Rosslare get cancelled. God help us it they find out that the 6 or 7 people who use these beloved and "vital" railway lines everyday have to take the bus instead...:rolleyes:

Losing the Dublin-Cork, Dublin-Limerick and other services is just "unfortunate"

Red Alert

I'd point out to the joker above (which did make me laugh i'll grant that!) that the french have a state owned railway company which is second to none both in long distance, commuter and metro operation - why? Because they actually went and built it properly from the start. Although now you wouldn't want to be asking Jean Pierre to drive an extra 5 minutes or anything.

BuffyBot

Well, this is what a driver is saying.

Well not really. It's not a direct quote, it's the journalist paraphrasing.

popebenny16

Or their beloved rural branch lines "services" to Ballybrophy

Actually I'm a big supporter of the Ballybrophy line as its a wonderfull monument to just how bad IE really is. Case in point: the car park at Ballybrophy is jammed in the mornings with commuters to Dublin. 'tis true. And, get this, (rolls round laughing) SOME OF THEM COME FROM ROSCREA!!!!!!

popebenny16

Actually, Buffybot....

Mr Collins, a train driver for 20 years, said his workmates were concerned about the lack of a code of practice on the new line.

Would you like to tell him or will I?

NavanJunction1

Ireland.com, 15.00hrs 16.05.2006

Fine Gael Transport spokeswoman Olivia Mitchell told the train drivers involved in the current dispute - " You've made your point, now get back to work".

She said the train drivers have had two days of "self-indulgent and irresponsible petulance."

"The drivers involved in this dispute have well-paid secure jobs, so why are they subjecting thousands of people to absolute misery and disruption?" she asked.

" The Labour Court has already found against the drivers on their pay claim," Ms Mitchell added. "Other issues were in the process of being dealt with and, in any event, under no circumstances does it justify the complete disruption of train services. The train drivers have made their point, and must now get back to work."

Taoiseach Bertie Ahern said yesterday the action was "particularly disappointing" given the investment that had been made in improving facilities for customers on the Dublin-Cork route.

He said there extensive mechanisms available through the labour relations machinery to sort out this type of issue without causing major inconvenience to the public.

Green Party Transport spokesperson Eamon Ryan TD said: "It is symptomatic of the systemic mismanagement within Mr. Cullen's Department that we have yet another industrial action in the transport sector."

"The strike centres on the drivers opposition by rail drivers to the new 'Mark Four' trains. These trains have been scheduled to be introduced for months and it was incumbent upon Minister Cullen to ensure that any outstanding issues were resolved before the introduction of the trains, as suggested by the Labour Court back in January," he said.

"The Minister must now face up to his responsibility to get all parties around the negotiating table and find a speedy resolution to this dispute ." concluded Deputy Ryan.

Meath Commuter rail lobby group Meath on Track has called for common-sense to prevail in the current rail strike caused by the introduction of new trains.

They say that the last serious rail strike in 2000 resulted in the closure of Kingscourt railway line despite the fact the line had 106 year history of transport freight as Gypsum Industries changed to road transport.

Meath on Track spokesperson Proinsias Mac Fhearghusa said: "Meath and Cavan have seen first hand what prolonged industrial action can do to the viability of railways.

"We call on all parties involved to start talking and to resolve the dispute over the introduction of the new trains to avoid escalation of industrial action and to save public confidence in Ireland's rail transport system."

Platform 11, the national rail users organisation, today said it was "shocked and appalled at the lack comment by the Minster for Transport, Martin Cullen."

"It is imply not good enough for the Minister for Transport to simply ignore what has now become a very serious situation."

Platform 11 called on the Mr Cullen to make a statement to the rail customers in this country and to take an immediate proactive approach in bringing a swift conclusion to the disruption.

The Irish Hotels Federation said it was extremely concerned by the potential impact of the train drivers' unofficial industrial action on visitors to the regions and in particular overseas visitors.

John Power, Chief Executive the Irish Hotels Federation said: "This action and its timing, at the start of the tourist season, is in our view short-sighted and very damaging to our industry. It could effectively undermine some of our members ' entire business this year with many visitors staying away from the regions because they have no choice."

© The Irish Times/ireland.com

Transport21 Fan

Meath Commuter rail lobby group Meath on Track has called for common-sense to prevail in the current rail strike caused by the introduction of new trains.

They say that the last serious rail strike in 2000 resulted in the closure of Kingscourt railway line despite the fact the line had 106 year history of transport freight as Gypsum Industries changed to road transport.

Meath on Track spokesperson Proinsias Mac Fhearghusa said: "Meath and Cavan have seen first hand what prolonged industrial action can do to the viability of railways.

"We call on all parties involved to start talking and to resolve the dispute over the introduction of the new trains to avoid escalation of industrial action and to save public confidence in Ireland's rail transport system."

Platform 11, the national rail users organisation, today said it was "shocked and appalled at the lack comment by the Minster for Transport, Martin Cullen."

"It is imply not good enough for the Minister for Transport to simply ignore what has now become a very serious situation."

Platform 11 called on the Mr Cullen to make a statement to the rail customers in this country and to take an immediate proactive approach in bringing a swift conclusion to the disruption.

It's always amazing how tolerant the DoT are of this bull****. Cullen should be on the news constantly reassuring passengers. Increidble really. He should make no bones about it that he is on the side of the passengers and not the drivers. This is the message he is giving out loud and clear.

You have to wonder if he is helping the IRN gricers to pick out the fruit baskets and flowers for the striking drivers.

Cullen is not paid by SIPTU or the NBRU. He has been hiding like a pussy since Monday.

Red Alert

He's probably got the more important matter of putting the voting machines in plastic sacks to deal with

paulm17781

Red Alert wrote:

He's probably got the more important matter of putting the voting machines in plastic sacks to deal with

Platform 11 issued a PR asking where Cullen is. Shock horror after a day and half of chaos (and 3 hours after our PR) Cullen came out and said that the strike was unacceptable.

He's a bit like Mr Mackey in South Park:

"Strikes are bad, you shouldn't go on unnoficial strike, cause its bad. When you strike, your bad. Strikes are bad."

Well put Mr Cullen, mmkayyy.

BuffyBot

Would you like to tell him or will I?

I said that you said this blah blah is not equal to a direct quote. I can say you said anything, really.

popebenny16

Would you say he didnt say it?

Navan Junction

Chris Dooley explains the issues behind the train drivers' strike and whether their action puts them outside the law

Irish Times, 17/05/2006

Q - Why are the train drivers on strike?

A - The trigger for the dispute was Iarnród Éireann's decision to press ahead on Monday with the introduction of its new high-tech, "Mark Four" train.


A Cork-based driver and his standby both refused to operate one of the new trains, which was due to depart Kent Station at 5.30am. The company did not suspend them but said they would not be paid while they weren't working.

All of their Cork-based and Dublin-based colleagues, and about half of those based in Limerick, immediately came out in support of the two drivers. Yesterday Athlone-based and Galway-based drivers joined the dispute.

Q - Were the other drivers who went on strike also required to drive the new trains?

A - No, they were being asked to work normally.

Q - What is the drivers' objection to the new trains anyway?

A - The drivers believe they should not be asked to operate the Mark Four trains until a range of what they see as related issues, including the introduction of new safety standards, are dealt with.

Iarnród Éireann says the new trains are a separate issue and the drivers are required to operate them, under the terms of a Labour Court recommendation of last January.

Q - What are these other issues, then? Did the Labour Court deal with them?

A - Most of the issues involved were addressed by the Labour Court in January. At that time the drivers' unions, Siptu and the National Bus and Rail Union, were seeking a 5 per cent pay increase as well as a reduction in drivers' working hours.

Q - Was this in return for driving the new, high-tech trains?

A - Yes, but also as compensation for other changes in work practices. For example, the company had introduced new safety standards which the unions said were having a significant impact on drivers' careers.

One such measure, known as "standard 23", involved drivers accumulating, in effect, penalty points for safety breaches. A driver who reached 25 points could find his career in "serious jeopardy", the unions said.

Iarnród Éireann accepted at the court hearing that standard 23 had been introduced in an unsatisfactory manner.

Q - What did the court say?

A - The court found that drivers were not entitled to pay increases or reduced working hours in return for driving the new trains.

It upheld the company's argument that the changes in work practices involved were already encompassed in a comprehensive agreement drawn up between the two sides in 2000 known as the "new deal".

But it said discussions should immediately commence on issues including the implementation of standard 23.

Q - Did that happen?

A - Yes, the company and the unions have been engaged in talks on standard 23 and other outstanding issues since January, as recommended by the court.

Q - Are the talks continuing?

A - Yes, only last week the two sides agreed to appoint industrial relations consultant Phil Flynn as mediator.

Q - So where did things go wrong?

A - The company, having invested €117 million in new carriages and engines, was anxious to proceed with the introduction of the Mark Four trains, on a trial basis, on Monday. This angered the drivers who claimed all of the outstanding issues should have been agreed first.

Q - Their strike is unofficial. Does that mean it is illegal?

A - Unions are required under the Industrial Relations Act of 1990 to hold a secret ballot and give at least a week's notice of industrial action. Employers are precluded from taking legal action against them once those provisions are met.

By acting as they have, the workers could be said to have placed themselves outside the protection of the Act. It could therefore be open to the company to pursue them for financial losses.

© The Irish Times

MrPudding

Navan Junction wrote:

By acting as they have, the workers could be said to have placed themselves outside the protection of the Act. It could therefore be open to the company to pursue them for financial losses.

© The Irish Times

Is there any chance they will? I sincerely hope they do.

MrP

popebenny16

Off we go again................

The trigger for the dispute was Iarnród Éireann's decision to press ahead on Monday with the introduction of its new high-tech, "Mark Four" train

It is not hi-tech. To say it is gives the impression that the drivers are being taken from driving a cortina to commanding the starship enterprise. The controll cabs are the same as they have been using since 1994 (?) when the 201's came in, they have to press a few extra buttons to open and close doors, however they have been pressing those exact same buttons since 1986.

The drivers believe they should not be asked to operate the Mark Four trains until a range of what they see as related issues, including the introduction of new safety standards, are dealt with.

Note: related issues. What could they be? Why, SAFETY of course!!!

For example:

For example, the company had introduced new safety standards which the unions said were having a significant impact on drivers' careers

Oh, so it was IE who were introducing safety standards. That must come as a bit of a shock there folks and I thought the unions were protecting us and IE putting our lives at risk with these horrible, unsafe, deathtraps (which are agreeably painted, I must admit)

involved drivers accumulating, in effect, penalty points for safety breaches. A driver who reached 25 points could find his career in "serious jeopardy", the unions said

Oh sweet jesus, not penalty points!!! we all know, if you drive, just what a bad idea they were, and how they are well known around the world for having no effect on curbing bad driving behaviour. Hint: these guys DRIVE trains, which you and me sit in. God forbid that they may have been out on the tear the night before and are abit worse for the weather. Well, if so it's IE's fault because as one driver admitted on IRN they dont usually get two days off together so what do you do, go out for a few the day you get off or the night before you go back? ITS A TOUGH ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! God dammit, how dare we infringe upon these guys personal freedoms and rights!!!!

So, let me just, like Ronnie Reagan, say it just one more time:

1. Why, if these trains are deathtraps, are the drivers going to operate them next week on the exact same terms as last week?

2. Why didnt they drive the other trains?

3. Why wasnt this an official dispute, focusing on our personal safety, because, you know, I'd support that.

Navan Junction

Fiona Gartland, Irish Times, 18/05/2006

Their introduction last Monday had precipitated a two-day unofficial strike around the country, leaving up to 80,000 people stranded and costing an estimated €1 million.


A joint statement issued yesterday evening by Iarnród Éireann, Siptu and the National Bus and Rail Union (NBRU) said the Joint National Locomotive Drivers Committee had unanimously agreed to recommend that the introduction of the new "Mark Four" trains should begin next Monday and that, in the interval, the unions would consult with their members.

The statement also said that a joint trade union/management agenda and schedule for facilitated meetings to discuss issues affecting locomotive drivers nationally was agreed.

Rail services returned to normal yesterday following the unofficial industrial action.The strike was called off after over 14 hours of negotiations on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning between Siptu and the NBRU, and industrial relations consultant Phil Flynn.

Industrial action began on Monday when two Cork-based drivers refused to operate a new high-tech train that the company had planned to bring into service on the Cork-Dublin route.

The action then spread with drivers based in Athlone and Galway joining those in Dublin, Cork and Limerick who had stopped working on Monday in support of their two colleagues.

As a result, there were no services between Heuston Station in Dublin and Cork, Galway or Westport, while only one train ran between Dublin and Limerick.

The company had planned the introduction of the Mark Four trains as part of a €117 million upgrade of services on the Dublin-Cork line. But drivers said the trains should not have been introduced until outstanding issues, such as the application of new safety standards, had been resolved. Yesterday's discussions between the union representatives, Mr Flynn and Iarnród Éireann management lasted almost eight hours.

Minister for Transport Martin Cullen yesterday criticised the strike, saying that such actions had no place in a modern, strong and competitive economy."It is not the way to do business. There are good mechanisms and industrial relations systems in place to deal with all these issues and that is where they should be dealt with," he said.

Asked if he was worried that similar industrial action could occur again when the company sought to introduce further new rolling stock, the Minister said that matters should be resolved before new rolling stock is brought in.

© The Irish Times

jimmycrackcorm

Are the train drivers the only people left in the country still subscribing to early 1980's labour economics. If we all behaved like them then the country would still be in ****e.