Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fine Gael in trouble over posters

Options
  • 22-05-2006 2:44pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 29,476 ✭✭✭✭


    From todays Irish Times -

    Complaint filed with Fine Gael over billboard ads

    Ruadhán Mac Eoin

    A complaint has been lodged with Fine Gael alleging that a number of
    the billboards used in their current advertising campaign are
    unauthorised, and in some instances are under enforcement proceedings,
    having been deemed by the local authority to "endanger public safety".

    The complaint was filed by Peter Sweetman, an environmental consultant
    and son of the late Fine Gael minister for finance Gerard Sweetman,
    with the Fine Gael head office in Mount Street, Dublin.

    Having initially specified locations in counties Wexford and Kilkenny,
    Mr Sweetman has since identified other locations in Waterford city and
    Co Wicklow, which he also intends to bring to the attention of the
    party.

    At one such site, at Bridge Street in Waterford, where the prismatic
    billboard currently features an image of Enda Kenny, Mr Sweetman said
    the structure had a three-year temporary permission. However, after
    that expired, a retention application was refused in November 2005 on
    the grounds that it would "endanger public safety by reason of traffic
    hazard" and that it would be "visually obtrusive".

    Last month, having again refused another application for the same
    site, the local authority issued enforcement proceedings. The matter
    has since been appealed to An Bord Pleanála by the site's operators,
    JC Decaux.

    Separately, another application seeking retention of a prismatic sign
    at Newgate Street, at present featuring a Fine Gael advert, was
    refused last week on the grounds that it "would be likely to distract
    drivers" and "endanger public safety by reason of a traffic hazard".

    In other cases where hoardings have been in situ for seven years or
    longer, the local authority is unable to seek enforcement. However,
    according to Mr Sweetman, "the fact that a structure is beyond the
    statute of limitation for legal prosecution under the Planning Acts
    does not render its continued maintenance or use authorised, or
    justify its use by any advertiser".

    Rebutting the complaint, a spokesman for Fine Gael said: "We've spoken
    to our media-buying companies and we have received assurances that the
    sites are fully compliant with the planning regulations."

    Catherine Millea for Kilkenny County Council said "it [ a sign at
    Luffany, Co Kilkenny] is a development which is unauthorised" and that
    "there are enforcement proceedings ongoing". The matter has also been
    raised by Mr Sweetman with his constituency Fine Gael TD, Michael
    Ring.

    Speaking yesterday, Mr Ring said that his "expectation is that as a
    national party, Fine Gael would get a reputable company and that they
    should have planning permission". However, "if they find out now that
    the sites haven't got permission, they should withdraw the contract
    immediately."

    (c) The Irish Times


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    and your opinion is?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,476 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Some don't like fine gael so they snitched on them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭Dirk Gently


    meh, I thought when seeing the title of this thread that the blueshirts had posters up of naked women or as Bertie photoshopped somehow to make him look ridiculous.

    how disappointing that this is not the case. This thread gets a thumbs down from me for raising my hopes up and then letting me down badly. :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    I like this. Nobody would give a shite if people weren't now looking for stuff to throw at FG. The country has a fight on its hands, and that's only good.

    In terms of the actual issue, FG can't really be held responsible if they got a company to organise it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    the planning permission for those billboard signs is allover the place if they have any at all


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,872 ✭✭✭segadreamcast


    Er, surely the responsibility is with the billboard operators JC Decaux? FG are only renting out space, isn't that the deal?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,476 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    I think it is just someone trying to make FG look bad by saying they use dodgy companies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,010 ✭✭✭besty


    I actually like the posters I must say! The same could be said for many of the people on boards *




    * I'll get my coat.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,476 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Whenever i see the "I will sack the wasters of taxpayers money" I always chuckle to myself. The first time I saw it I nearly crashed the car balling with laughter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,510 ✭✭✭Tricity Bendix


    In terms of the actual issue, FG can't really be held responsible if they got a company to organise it.

    It could (but probably shouldn't) be seen as indicative of Mount St's organisational abilities. PPARS was the government's fault, even though it was the consultants who screwed up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Meh.

    fg5.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    NoelRock wrote:
    Er, surely the responsibility is with the billboard operators JC Decaux? FG are only renting out space, isn't that the deal?

    This would be the same company that FF and Labour and the Greens and the chuckies and every other organisation and/or company uses eh? Someone's been up burning the midnight oil looking for mud to sling I see. Just a shame they weren't awake at the time ...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭jjbrien


    Bond-007 wrote:
    Whenever i see the "I will sack the wasters of taxpayers money" I always chuckle to myself. The first time I saw it I nearly crashed the car balling with laughter.

    Actually the tax payer is not paying for these billboards its coming from FG party funds not the tax payer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 595 ✭✭✭gilroyb


    The suggestion that pictures of Enda Kenny would distract anyone is ridiculous. The only danger is that these billboards may cause more drivers falling asleep at the wheel.

    It's unusual for a 2D picture of a person to actually add depth to their personality. Why is Enda trying so very hard to avoid my vote?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19 Widgeon


    It says something for the perceived threat that FG poses to the incumbents that this matter makes such an impact. FG must be laughing their sides sore with all the publicity they are getting- there's no such thing as bad publicity:


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    gilroyb wrote:
    The suggestion that pictures of Enda Kenny would distract anyone is ridiculous. The only danger is that these billboards may cause more drivers falling asleep at the wheel.

    It's unusual for a 2D picture of a person to actually add depth to their personality. Why is Enda trying so very hard to avoid my vote?

    And presumably a poster of the wonderful Bertie and his team of clowns would distract you then??


  • Registered Users Posts: 595 ✭✭✭gilroyb


    mfitzy wrote:
    And presumably a poster of the wonderful Bertie and his team of clowns would distract you then??

    I think all poster ads with the various leaders are silly. That said, I think reminding people that Enda Kenny is FG leader is especially silly.


Advertisement