Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why are national teams different?

  • 30-05-2006 8:07pm
    #1
    vorbis
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭


    Coming up to a world cup and most of the big teams have been playin experimental friendlies and trying out this formation and that. The odd thing is at club level its generally desirable to have a settled team playing the same formation week in week out. Why does this change at international level?

    Small countries do well imo is that they're forced to stick to one formation and don't have the depth of players required to be constantly chopping and changing. England, France and Spain on the other hand can change half a team from one friendly to the next. Surely big countries would have more success by fielding the same 11 for most friendlies.

    I doubt that international level is really of a higher standard to the champions league. It seems more of a case that the players are not on the same wavelength due to a lack of game time together. Brazil have the right idea. They've named the starting team for the first world cup match already. This gives players time to practice together and to well be a team.


Comments

  • #2
    PHB
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,617 ✭✭✭✭PHB


    Bad managers


  • #3
    leeroybrown
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    International managers have a lot less time with their players in training and with the vital nature of qualifiers and the limited number of friendlies a lot less time to experiment. That said I think that quite a few of them fiddle too much and that the run up to the world cup should be spent putting finesse on your side not deciding what formation to play.


  • #4
    eyerer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭eyerer


    could also argue they wanna avoid potential injuries so soon to the real thing


  • #5
    cregser
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 999 ✭✭✭cregser


    PHB wrote:
    Bad managers
    I agree.

    They definitely seem to have less of a clue of what they're doing than club managers. But they are at the mercy of club football - which is why only experienced managers should manage internationally (because they've been there and seen it all and don't have to waste time tinkering).

    The catch22 is that the class managers see club football as the only decent challenge - with the exceptions of Luiz Felipe Scolari and maybe Guus Hiddink. The other international managers are only "highly rated" and not exactly proven (although that could be argued - it's all opinion).


Advertisement