Simple HTML problem - iframe not centering properly

DOLEMAN

Sorry but that link actually breaks rule 8 of the charter

forbairt

could you not just put up an alternative mock site without the content ... you might find a better response ...

Ph3n0m

Have to agree with error9 - I normally try and help everyone - but with that kind of site content and with me in work, the phrase "oh hell no" comes to mind

dahamsta

He did say it was "adult material" and "not work safe". In caps. DOLEMAN, next time you link to something like this, you'd probably be better off saying something like "exposed vaginas ahead", people don't actually read posts half the time on here.

It's odd alright, they center in DW and FF, but not in IE. It could be the comments and whitespace between the </IFRAME> and the <BR>* tags; I'd try moving those tight to the </IFRAME> if I was you, before the comments (i.e. no whitespace between).

<!-- PERFECTGONZO PLUGIN 08/06/2006  -->
<iframe width="695" height="440" src="http://pluginx.perfectgonzo.com/mov_dir/306825/mov_camp_2575/index.html" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe><br><br><br>
<!-- END of PERFECTGONZO PLUGIN 08/06/2006  -->

I find myself wondering how long before some dipstick tries to get your site closed down tbh, and whether they'll be clever enough to try it via the IEDR. Who probably would, unfortunately. Something to bear in mind.

Best of luck with it, but ffs put some content up there. Sites with no content look ridiculous.

adam

* Which should really be <br /> these days btw.

Ph3n0m

Ken Shabby wrote:

He did say it was "adult material" and "not work safe". In caps. DOLEMAN, next time you link to something like this, you'd probably be better off saying something like "exposed vaginas ahead", people don't actually read posts half the time on here.

He was also looking for help - which at this time of day, most people are either in work or in college (were viewing such material can get you kicked out or fired).

It would have been comparably easy just to post the html and remove all reference to ""

DOLEMAN

Ken Shabby wrote:

It's odd alright, they center in DW and FF, but not in IE. It could be the comments and whitespace between the </IFRAME> and the <BR>* tags; I'd try moving those tight to the </IFRAME> if I was you, before the comments (i.e. no whitespace between).

Yeah it's very strange. Tried your suggestion but no joy. Thanks for trying anyway.

Ken Shabby wrote:

I find myself wondering how long before some dipstick tries to get your site closed down tbh, and whether they'll be clever enough to try it via the IEDR. Who probably would, unfortunately. Something to bear in mind.

Yeah, I'm expecting some freak to try something. However the site is a registered business so the IEDR can't close it down. They'd get in a bit of trouble...

Ken Shabby wrote:

Best of luck with it, but ffs put some content up there. Sites with no content look ridiculous.

Tis still under construction! Give it another month.

Cheers.

DOLEMAN

Ph3n0m wrote:

He was also looking for help - which at this time of day, most people are either in work or in college (were viewing such material can get you kicked out or fired).

It would have been comparably easy just to post the html and remove all reference to "http://www.sex.ie&quot;

Well, I'm not forcing anyone to open the site in work or college... I did give plenty of warning so no one needs to risk getting in trouble...

Ph3n0m

DOLEMAN wrote:

Well, I'm not forcing anyone to open the site in work or college... I did give plenty of warning so no one needs to risk getting in trouble...

who said you were? you needed help, but you also needed that help with a site that most people would be unwilling to look at during the day (if they were at work, etc) - thats the point I was making

Gosh

Ph3n0m wrote:

It would have been comparably easy just to post the html and remove all reference to "http://www.sex.ie&quot;

Or at least replaced the pictures with something less pornographic, giving the warning that it's adult and explicit is only more likely to make people curious (like me :eek:)

DOLEMAN

Hang on, you can't give me hassle over this!

I gave plenty of warnings. I am sure you've all used the Internet before so you know what "adult material" means...

forbairt

OK I thought linking to sexual material wasn't allowed from your standard webpages ...

If you're a professional .. one would assume you could mock up your problem in a few minutes ? ... most of the people on here who'll be able to respond to your question a lot quicker if they don't have to worry about the site contents ..

If you just need help with a problem and not just traying to increase ranking by posting of your site then it shouldn't be any problem to you ...

I actually ended up clicking on the link .. and have to say THANK GOD I didn't open that up at work earlier ..

dahamsta

One more childish outburst like that, and you are banned for a week

Doest matter if he said NSFW - it is against the charter - duh!!!

forbairt

Ken Shabby wrote:

FFS, he said NSFW. Which part of NSFW are you people too stupid to understand?

obviously this part

LoLth wrote:

8. KEEP IT CLEAN. That means, NO links to Pron (donkey or otherwise) , NO (or at least as little as possible) swearing – the stars are there for a reason you know!.