Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Which Vehicle ??

Options
  • 20-07-2006 11:46am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 689 ✭✭✭


    Another which car thread so here it goes:

    Both New.

    1. BMW 520d M-Tec
    2. Range Rover Sport 2.7TD SE

    Why?


    Points:
    a. I am fully aware that I could purchase a better/faster second hand car for less money but I choose to buy new because I like to have a new car and I don't mind parting with the money in this way. Besies, if people like me did not buy new cars, they people lke you would not get the great deals that you get on second hand cars later on. Rant Over.

    b. I would be open to suggestion of another car/suv of similar price bracket (up to €70,000)

    c. Not really looking for high performance. Speed limit is 120km/hr and both of these cars are more than capable of doing this.

    Thanks,

    Mike.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 741 ✭✭✭michaelanthony


    The 520D sounds like a tractor. But Range Rover one sounds a lot better( it's used in jaguars)


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭TheBazman


    Hi Mike

    I am changing myself with a similar budget - seriously looking at the BMW m-sport diesels. Ideally I would like a new 530d but thats a bit expensive. The problem with going for an 05 is that some of the spec is different eg no push button start, no ipod connection port, not many second hands with xenons which I would like. These are small issues but spending that sort of money I would like these things - As a result I am leaning towards a new 520d with quite a few "extras"

    I have considered a few others but not the range rover ( I would have thought that would be far more expensive??)
    Touareg - nice but I would like the 3.0 v6 which again is a bit more expensive and I'm not ever sure I "need" a 4x4
    Lexus IS220d - nice looking but very small inside and boot quite small
    M3 - second hand - Is all that power wasted and it would be too tempting to do silly things (plus I've already had my fun with a powerful sports car)
    Merc CLK - only two real seats in back and not a huge fan of mercs anyway

    My twopence for what its worth

    Baz


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭TheBazman


    The 520D sounds like a tractor. But Range Rover one sounds a lot better( it's used in jaguars)
    I test drove the 520d and it sounded fine - but I cant compare it to the Range Rover


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,269 ✭✭✭MercMad


    I had a RR Sport for a week !

    I suggest you test drive it, and if you survive without breaking any of the cheap flimsy plastic, thank your stars. I couldn't believe how "low rent" the materials felt. The grey plastic console and the interior door handles in particular !

    When you consider that the real RR has one of the nicest interiors in the busisness, the Sport is just a disaster. BMW quality and engines are superb though i did like the way the RR Sport diesel drove !

    Audi Q7 ??


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭el tel


    My brother bought a 2005 530D Touring M-Tech from new. With all his options it cost him a whisker under €80k. It looks pretty good in Carbon black but it feels slow on the uptake and is cramped inside. Personally I think he wasted his money but that's his problem I suppose. Still, I'd say it is a much more sensible option over a Range Rover - had he got one of those I'd have refused to talk to him again!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,376 ✭✭✭Squirrel




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,854 ✭✭✭zuutroy


    Mike2006 wrote:
    Besies, if people like me did not buy new cars, they people lke you would not get the great deals that you get on second hand cars later on.

    Thank you for your scraps oh master....

    Anyway....BMW for me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 94 ✭✭mc23


    zuutroy wrote:
    Thank you for your scraps oh master....
    :D:D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 689 ✭✭✭Mike2006


    Thanks for the replies so far.

    Obviously my quote was aimed at the people who always bash the new car buyers.

    520d: One thing I did notice was that you really do need to load up the BMW with extras before you get a decent specd car and this costs a lot. €15k of extras goes very quickly...

    Q7: Haven't seen one in the flesh yet so I can't comment. Again, the extras list could possibly be a killer.

    Touareg: A possibility, but only 2.5tdi. They are getting plentiful at the moment so will be able to see what the residuals are like.

    RR Sport: Haven't teat drove one yet but before I make a purchase I will try to hire out by final 2 for a week to try them out first.

    A6: They are quite expensive for the badge which I would consider to be a bit below RR, Mercedes, BMW... They are a good looking car though.

    I also quite like the Lexus GS but I haven't really researched it yet.

    Mike.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,763 Mod ✭✭✭✭ToxicPaddy


    Ive heard from a few people that they found the 520d to be very under powered and the 530d is a much better car to drive. Might be worth considering it.. Tox


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭dubstub


    Saw one of the Q7's the other day. Beautiful jeep. I picked up a Touareg last week and can't recommend them enough. Depending on what you want the extras can get steep very quickly though.
    I went for the 2.5TDI - was very tempted by the V6 but the wait and the high running costs put me off it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    If you can't quite stretch to a 530d then how about a 330d? Even a 320d might be a better drive than the 520d. Forget the Range Rover Sport unless you want people to look down their noses at you - it's the ultimate triumph of cash over class.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭TheBazman


    dubstub wrote:
    Saw one of the Q7's the other day. Beautiful jeep. I picked up a Touareg last week and can't recommend them enough. Depending on what you want the extras can get steep very quickly though.
    I went for the 2.5TDI - was very tempted by the V6 but the wait and the high running costs put me off it.

    As regards running costs I have seen mixed info on the MPG. What are you getting from the 2.5?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash




  • Registered Users Posts: 65,408 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Seems you're a bit like my brother in law. He constantly switches between BMW and MB and if he were in the market right now, he'd go RR Sport, although it is just that he likes the idea, he hasn't been in one yet and he doesn't seem to care how a car drives

    Power is not important to you and neither is getting a good drivers' car, but you want style and class (and diesel)? Do you change car every year or will you keep it for a while?

    How about the stylish CLS 320 CDI (a bit out of budget)? Or an alternative D4 tractor, like the X5 3.0d?


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,243 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    dubstub wrote:
    Saw one of the Q7's the other day. Beautiful jeep. I picked up a Touareg last week and can't recommend them enough. Depending on what you want the extras can get steep very quickly though.
    I went for the 2.5TDI - was very tempted by the V6 but the wait and the high running costs put me off it.

    The VW Touareg, Audi Q7 and Porsche Cayeanne are all built from the same platform afaik.


  • Registered Users Posts: 689 ✭✭✭Mike2006


    I usually change every 2 to 3 years.

    CLS would be very nice but it is over budget.

    SAAB - Never really considered one of those. I don't really know a whole lot about them to be honest (reliability, depreciation etc..)

    X5 - Just don't like them. Did at the start but quickly grew out of them. A bit like I did with the Z3.

    3 Series - interior too small.

    Mike.


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,408 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Mike2006 wrote:
    SAAB - Never really considered one of those. I don't really know a whole lot about them to be honest (reliability, depreciation etc..)

    Saabs are fine, but a 9-3 is the same size as a 3-series, so too small for you. Also it is built on the same platform as an Opel Vectra. I bet you don't like that idea
    Mike2006 wrote:
    CLS would be very nice but it is over budget

    It is highly sought after, so depreciation will be very low. OK €15k over budget, but you'll get some of that back come resell time. Also auto transmission is standard. A car in this segment these days kinda needs to have auto to sell it on later


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 271 ✭✭ismynametoolong


    Does it have to be diesel a mate of mine has a Legacy Spec B with
    all the goodies including sat Nav it think it is a 2.5 or 3.0 litre petrol amazing car and a looker too .


  • Registered Users Posts: 689 ✭✭✭Mike2006


    No offence to the Subaru gang but a Subaru is not exactly in the category of car that I would purchase, but thanks for the replies.

    Shortlist:

    1. RR Sport 2.7 TDV6 SE
    2. 520d M-Tec
    3. Touareg 2.5 TDi


    a. Q7 is very expensive even with the base model.
    b. Saab - Vectra !!! No thanks.
    c. CLS - Just too expensive, plus 3L engine would be a killer on tax & insurance.
    d. A6 - Just missing the cut in the 'looks' department.

    Thanks again,

    Mike.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 65,408 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Mike2006 wrote:
    c. CLS - Just too expensive

    Fair enough
    Mike2006 wrote:
    plus 3L engine would be a killer on tax & insurance

    A new €70k car is going to depreciate by at least €10k in its first year. Tax and insurance is probably a few hundred bucks more on a 3 liter compared to a 2 liter. This is immaterial, don't let it give you a false sense of economy


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,184 ✭✭✭Fey!


    The 520d isn't too tractor-ish; a neighbour of mine has a new touring version in black which is really nice (haven't been an e60 fan up to now looks wise). However, get the likes of the MFSW, leather and dual climate if you can - I know that cruise was one of the must-have features when I bought - it may make it easier to resell. Also, the guy who sold my neighbour his told him to go manual, as it's be easier to resell (although I'm not so sure about this myself).

    The RR Sport drives well, but I've only seen one REALLY nice looking one - again it was in black with a light factory tint. But do you really need a 4x4?

    Toureg - have seen a few nice ones, but not my cup of tea.

    Good luck with the decision (wish I could afford to have the same problem as you!!!)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,336 ✭✭✭Bluehair


    unkel wrote:
    A new €70k car is going to depreciate by at least €10k in its first year. Tax and insurance is probably a few hundred bucks more on a 3 liter compared to a 2 liter. This is immaterial, don't let it give you a false sense of economy

    Exactly, never quite understood the mentally of spending this kind of money on a car and then fretting about relatively paltry sums in relation to engine size etc.

    Buy a one year old CLS in the UK and get the best of every world (oh sorry, i forgot the bit where you don't mind throwing money away for a new car but do mind the extra tax and insurance of a 3.0 litre.... :confused: )


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,685 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    Here's my opinion:


    BMW 520d M-Sport
    Had some fairly good feedback about the 520d in general. Bit slow off the mark but the performance once going is supposed to be very good. I've driven a 320d and that was a flier, but the 520 is a good bit heavier. I've driven a 523 in traffic and it was very comfortable but the diesel is definately the one to go for. The standard spec on the M-Sport is fairly good so you wouldn't have to go mad on the options list. Half leather is standard as are parking sensors, climate control, electric seats etc. Availability isn't bad, my local dealer (Maxwell's) has a Carbon Black Auto available within 10 days.

    RV wise you'd be looking at around €27,000 as a trade in based on 3yrs / 60,000 miles.


    Range Rover Sport 2.7TDV6 SE
    Favourite vehicle I have driven. Again slowish off the mark but once going an absolute cracker. Really don't know why they didn't use the bi-turbo version of the engine that goes in to the S-Type Jag. Price would be higher than the BMW but the RV over 3yrs / 60,000 miles is expected to be around €37,000 as a trade in. SE spec is very good, Full leather as standard. Waiting times on these could be fairly long. I've been quoted 4-6 Months for delivery.


    VW Toureg.
    Drove a diesel one of these last week. Not bad, but not a patch on the Range Rover. Standard spec is a bit stingy so the (extensive) options list would come in to play. Whatever you do, do not go anywhere near the petrol version. Drove one of those last year that a customer gave back (at a cost) after less than a year as he would rather cycle in to work. Gearbox couldn't make up it's mind and the fuel consumption was appaling (22mpg at 70mph on the motorway).

    RV for the diesel would be looking at €32 - €33K based on 3yrs / 60,000 miles.



    If it were me and I had the cash (I wish) I'd probably wait for a Range Rover. If I wanted something now I'd go for the BMW. Wouldn't consider the Toureg due to problems with VW reliability and service issues - same for Merc ML.


  • Registered Users Posts: 204 ✭✭dubstub


    TheBazman wrote:
    As regards running costs I have seen mixed info on the MPG. What are you getting from the 2.5?

    Been getting 23.5 mpg but that's been pure city driving - will see how it does on motorways and long distances after this weekend.
    The VW Touareg, Audi Q7 and Porsche Cayeanne are all built from the same platform afaik.

    Yep, sure are. Same chassis underpins all three cars.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,269 ✭✭✭MercMad


    If it were me and I had the cash (I wish) I'd probably wait for a Range Rover. If I wanted something now I'd go for the BMW. Wouldn't consider the Toureg due to problems with VW reliability and service issues - same for Merc ML

    ..............I dont think you can compare the old ML to the new one. The new ones appear to be doing very well !

    It the quality in the Range Rover that is shockingly poor !

    I dunno about the looks of the Toerag, VW always get the wheel/tire aspect ratio to the body worked out well but not in this case !

    It looks awful IMO !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 271 ✭✭ismynametoolong


    . Wouldn't consider the Toureg due to problems with VW reliability and service issues - same for Merc ML.[/QUOTE]


    Are you seriously implying that the RR is more reliable than the VW . There both over priced unnecessary muscle show machines but i know i certainly wouldnt have anything with the word ROVER on it regardless of who owns or produces them now !!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,660 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Are you seriously implying that the RR is more reliable than the VW . There both over priced unnecessary muscle show machines but i know i certainly wouldnt have anything with the word ROVER on it regardless of who owns or produces them now !!

    Ford's Premier Automotive Group do... same people who make Jaguar, Aston Martin, and Volvo


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,685 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    MercMad wrote:
    ..............I dont think you can compare the old ML to the new one. The new ones appear to be doing very well !


    The new ML is by all accounts a very good machine - I'm just going off the fact that our FD's 3 week old one has been pi55ing oil out of the gearbox all over the car park and is now in with Pottery Road, where no doubt it will lounge for weeks before a half-arsed repair attempt is made.


    Think that more or less says it all about Mercedes build quality and dealer service - bearing in mind I work for their largest customer!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 271 ✭✭ismynametoolong


    maidhc wrote:
    Ford's Premier Automotive Group do... same people who make Jaguar, Aston Martin, and Volvo


    The RR is manufactured in Solihull UK enough said me thinks !!


Advertisement