Hezbollah t-shirts?

WhiteWashMan

Zane from MTV2 wrote:

OH NOEZ a pathetic little RAhead called me an ''ass wipe''!!!!

banned for personal insults

Tha Gopher

Am I the only person who found the original post hilarious? I dunno, asking for Hezbollah t shirts, its like a post along the lines of "i heard theres a porno with the cast members of father ted, with the actors who played Jack and Mrs Doyle in character throughout the whole thing. where can I buy it". Its just such an outlandish request it made me laugh me balls off

And anyway, whats the difference between Hezbollah and the more socially acceptable Che shirts? Hezbollah are doing nothing more than defending their land and people. Why? Because for 60 years the US and UK have let Israel away with activity that they wouldnt let the likes of Milosevic away with for 6 months back in the late 90s.


And hese bans for personal abuse are gone too far imo. This attack the post not the poster business merely gives certain people licence to post retarded opinions which result in anyone who opposes them with slightly colourful language getting a ban. How long do they last anyway?

And besides, shouldnt this be in the fashion forum?

Spastafarian

Dr_Teeth wrote:

I'm sure you can get one made up using their logo if you want:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Flag_of_Hezbollah.svg#file

It looks pretty funky actually.. I doubt most people would know what it meant.

That's deadly!!

I outraged at the insensitivity of the whole thing until I saw that!
I want one!

Dooom

DaveMcG wrote:

My magic powers have made the thread unlockable!

That's just ridiculous. It's obvious my l33t mind phorces unlocked the thread.

Collie D

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ wrote:

http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/ these kids is it.

no they are next to the UN peacekeeping outlook... that's if you can find it now.
or maybe they are down by the refuge camps... oh they are gone as well.
try the hospitals in Beirut... somebody bombed them as well...sigh...

Typical leftie Socialist Worker's Party type response. Trotter wasn't taking Israel's side over Lebanon's. When are those unwashed Trinity students who are constantly standing outside the GPO going to realise if you are protesting for peace you can't back one side over another.

Blood is boiling now, want to go on a rant about them now but will leave it for another day

Diogenes

Diogenes wrote:

I like this one

US ARMED FORCES FREEDOM WORLD TOUR
http://www.thoseshirts.com/tour.html

I like it and I want one.

Though this is good too...

http://www.thoseshirts.com/coulter.html

\m/_(>_<)_\m/

Collie D wrote:

Trotter wasn't taking Israel's side over Lebanon's.

typical yank attitude.
so why was did he specify one side children over another...

....sigh .... some people...jjjjjjeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzuuuusssssss.

read his post will ya.

Trotter

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ wrote:

http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/ these kids is it.

no they are next to the UN peacekeeping outlook... that's if you can find it now.
or maybe they are down by the refuge camps... oh they are gone as well.
try the hospitals in Beirut... somebody bombed them as well...sigh...

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ wrote:

so why was did he specify side children over another...

....sigh .... some people...jjjjjjeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzuuuusssssss.

read his post will ya.

I specified one side because emm.. the OP wanted a tshirt that celebrated the death of innocent people. I dont CARE where they are from. I HATE what Isreal and Hezbollah are doing, and all of my thoughts are with the innocent people of the conflict.

My post was in the context of the title of this whole discussion.

Do not attempt to tell me which side I am on because I am not on any side. If anything, I am on the side of the 500 or so people that have lost their lives in this mess.

I did not mention the lebanese children in the first post but they are not being killed by Hezbollah, therefore that is why I spoke about the Israeli children.

If the OP wanted an Israel t-shirt, I would be equally as abhorred as I am. So, can you please stop categorising people in an attempt to find someone to spit at.

I see you conveniently didnt bother reading my post about the letter my friend wrote while he was being shelled by the Israelis. The reason you havent made reference to that post is because you'd prefer to personalise things and drag me onto a "side".

So.. dont post a website full of dead children and expect me to be educated from it. I know more about this conflict than you realise. When you have had friends and family spending combined years being attacked by both Israel and Hezbollah while sitting in UNIFIL outposts writing what they think could be their last letter, then get back to me and tell me which side you're on.

Oh and to avoid a banning, I wont say what Im really thinking, but I will leave this post on a quote from your good self.

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ wrote:

oh shut up and get back in your cave.

Wing Walker

Dr_Teeth wrote:

I'm sure you can get one made up using their logo if you want:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Flag_of_Hezbollah.svg#file

It looks pretty funky actually.. I doubt most people would know what it meant.

Just on the flag, does anyone else think the object to the left of the hand holding the gun looks a bit phallic?

Trode

Wing Walker wrote:

Just on the flag, does anyone else think the object to the left of the hand holding the gun looks a bit phallic?

Yeah, looks that way to me too.
Hezbullah: Di*ks with guns.

dr.bollocko

dr.bollocko wrote:

Is there no hope for humanity at all?

None

Collie D

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ wrote:

typical yank attitude.
so why was did he specify one side children over another...

....sigh .... some people...jjjjjjeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzuuuusssssss.

read his post will ya.

I did read his post, not going to bother with this as it's been said already that Israeli children were only mentioned because the OP was about Hezbollah. I have not taken anyside, both have killed civilians and both are in the wrong.

InFront

L31mr0d wrote:

I mean, personally, I find a lot of them very funny, which you might say makes me amoral, but how many people thought the Muslims where overreacting about that sketch published in Denmark? Some peoples idea of a joke differs, just because some people are more conservative does not mean they are in anyway more mature. If joebhoy1916 wants to wear a tshirt expressing his view of this conflict, then thats his choice. Sometimes actually wearing an image of something can actually exemplify how stupid the whole situation actually is.

I mean we can all say we are morally affected by whats going on over in the middle east now, but who of us have done anything other than flick on the news and go "aww thats terrible, another cup of tea anyone?". Actions speak louder and all that jazz. If someone told you some witty joke about Hezbollah, say 2 years from now when it has all blown over (that or we're sh!t deep in WW3) i'm sure you'd laugh, its just now its a sore issue as its happening. How about instead of slating joebhoy1916 for wanting a contemporary humour tshirt, try actually getting involved in anti-war protests and stop joebhoy1916 from having anything to put on a tshirt.

I agree he has every right to wear a Hezbollah t shirt (I presume it's not illegal to do so). But equally anyone who disagrees with these actions has the right to say so. Just because someone isn't attending the latest anti-war rally, it doesn't mean they cant grumble about someone who want to wear a t-shirt celebrating a war, or seeming to celebrate a war. Probably it is short sighted, but all people here are doing is complaining about the idiocy directly in front of them. It doesnt take up that much time that you cant peacefully protest against the Israeli attacks as well, you know.

which quite honestly, or lobbying the UN, means nothing to Palestine or Hezbollah or Beirut or Timbucktwo, or whoever is next on Israel's list of targets.

L31mr0d

Deleted User wrote:

I like it and I want one.

Though this is good too...

http://www.thoseshirts.com/coulter.html

I think this one is hilarious, after what Bush was saying at the G8 conference it completely rings true.

L31mr0d

L31mr0d wrote:

I think this one is hilarious.

WhiteWashMan

joebhoy1916 wrote:

Who you calling scum ass wipe

banned

InFront

Deja vu? Or was I having premonitions earlier?

Black Swan

How about Bad Taste T-Shop online? Heard they also have a close-up screen print of people jumping from the top of the Twin Towers just before they collapsed.:eek:

\m/_(>_<)_\m/

WhiteWashMan wrote:

banned

so let me get this right
its OK to call somebody "RA sucm" but in defence you cant call somebody ass-wipe....

interesting.... kinda double standards, bit like the conflict we are on about.

Terry

i have a solution to this whole thing.
not too many people are going to like it, but i really think it will work it we all band together.

plan A: we get all the catholic* countries in the world together and go on a new crusade.
'convert or die' will be our slogan.

we start with the u.s. they will be the biggest obstacle, but we will have some allies working on the inside.
then we take britain.
while we have america and britain occupied, isreal and the muslim middle east countries will be bombing the crap out of each other, leaving it easier for us to get in there and take control.

plan B: nuke the crap out of the holy land. leave it uninhabitable.
problem instantly solved.

* i say catholic countries because Ireland is mostly catholic and i would like to see us on the winning side. you don't need to be catholic to join in. just pretend you are. i'm not actually religious myself, but i can fake it. i'm sure most here could do the same.

plan B would probably be the easier way around this problem though.


mky god. i've just re-read that post. hitler would have been proud of me. ok, we could give them all a warning to evacuate beofre the nuking begins. we don't have to kill them all.
why did he have to go invading all those countries? he could have just worked quietly on the atom bomb and then kicked ass. tsk, greedy bastard.

Dave!

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ wrote:

so let me get this right
its OK to call somebody "RA sucm" but in defence you cant call somebody ass-wipe....

interesting.... kinda double standards, bit like the conflict we are on about.

eh, both of them were banned

TomCo

julep wrote:

i have a solution to this whole thing.
not too many people are going to like it, but i really think it will work it we all band together.

plan A: we get all the catholic* countries in the world together and go on a new crusade.
'convert or die' will be our slogan.

we start with the u.s. they will be the biggest obstacle, but we will have some allies working on the inside.
then we take britain.
while we have america and britain occupied, isreal and the muslim middle east countries will be bombing the crap out of each other, leaving it easier for us to get in there and take control.

plan B: nuke the crap out of the holy land. leave it uninhabitable.
problem instantly solved.

* i say catholic countries because Ireland is mostly catholic and i would like to see us on the winning side. you don't need to be catholic to join in. just pretend you are. i'm not actually religious myself, but i can fake it. i'm sure most here could do the same.

plan B would probably be the easier way around this problem though.


mky god. i've just re-read that post. hitler would have been proud of me. ok, we could give them all a warning to evacuate beofre the nuking begins. we don't have to kill them all.
why did he have to go invading all those countries? he could have just worked quietly on the atom bomb and then kicked ass. tsk, greedy bastard.

Can we not do both?

InFront

julep wrote:

i have a solution to this whole thing.

plan B: nuke the crap out of the holy land. leave it uninhabitable.
problem instantly solved.

Yeah until you have to displace the people from the region. How about we create a whole new nation, call it oh I dont know, 'Israel' and plant the settlers in your home town. Confey, is it?

Terry

well we could do plan A first and get our hands on america and britains nukes and use them to carry out plan B.

wait. i have another one.

plan C: let them all kill each other. the world would be a better place without them and their constant wars.
just get the U.N. out of there and leave them to their own devices.
if israel wins, then so be it.
if the muslims win, then so be it.
either way, it would put and end to all this crap.

Terry

InFront wrote:

Yeah until you have to displace the people from the region. How about we create a whole new nation, call it oh I dont know, 'Israel' and plant the settlers in your home town. Confey, is it?

put them all in america and britain. they're the ones who created the state of israel in the first place. let them deal with the consequences of their actions.

'hey, listen. we lived on that bit of land there 5,000 years ago, but the egyptians made us walk around the desert for 40 years. then we couldn't get back in. any chance of getting it back, please?'

stupid ****ing religious wars.
we had enough of that crap here for centuries.
will someone just tell them that the easter bunny doesn't exist.

Giblet

Tar banned.