Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

ECW 29/08/06 *Spoilers, identity of enforcers*

  • 30-08-2006 3:44pm
    #1
    Dickmcsavage
    Registered Users Posts: 393 ✭✭


    Just after watching this weeks show and TBH it was very good. All the elements about the show that I don't like weren't featured. Im talking Kelly's expose, Test & Mike Knox, and Kevin Thorn. The first match, RVD Vs. Holly was solid and I enjoyed it with Holly getting the win after RVD puposely DQ'd himself to get revenge with a steel chair. CM Punk Vs. Steven Richards again was another solid confrontation. I liked the fact that it wasn't a squash and that Richards gave as good as he got in the match even though in the end he tapped out to the anaconda vice. The next segment, Matt Skriker addressing the ECW faithful and beating up the Sandman, was the only let down of the show. The guy is clearly not liked by anyone. Not in a 'HHH is a heel but he's still entertaining' kind of way but more of a 'Matt Striker, I wish you would get a career ending injury' kind of way. The main event was thouroughly enjoyable even though for the most part it was just the big show and the enforcers just beating Sabu up. It was the way in which the whole thing was executed that made it work. At the end of the match however, there was a close up on the enforcers who at this stage had their helmets removed and were wearing balaclavas. Even though they were covered up, it was clear that the enforcers are in fact the Basham Brothers! Well, there you go folks... The Basham Brothers.


Comments

  • #2
    liverpoolkev
    Closed Accounts Posts: 35 ✭liverpoolkev


    How can you get DQ'd in ECW they have done that a few times and it wrecks my head.


  • #3
    Fozzy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭Fozzy


    It's WWE's new version of ECW. They distinguish between extreme and non-extreme rules matches. Which is fairly silly, because ECW never used to say that their matches were different in name

    It had been reported a good while back that it was the Bashams. Maybe they'll be cheered if they keep their faces covered..

    On a related topic, Claudio Castagnoli was one of the policemen on Raw!


  • #4
    Cactus Col
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cactus Col


    It's great to see the bashams back though, and as a tag team (hopefully). It was a shame when they were split up.


Advertisement