Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Networking Issue

Options
  • 25-09-2006 9:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭


    Help needed. I've a network setup with 30 machines/switchs/accesspoints/dvr etc. IP range is from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.30 with a subnet of 255.255.255.224. Problem at the moment is that I cant assign an IP address beyond .30?? By that I mean I can assign it but it wont see/be seen by the other machines. I know I'm missing something basic here but all help greatly appreciated.
    P.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    You've answered your own question really , here's a simplified explanation ...
    a subnet of 255.255.255.224 ( or /27 )
    starting at 192.168.1.1 goes to 192.168.1.30 ( 192.168.1.31 is your broadcast address for that range )

    if you use a subnet of 255.255.255.0 ( or /24 )
    it will go from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.254 ( .255 will be your broadcast )

    Did you just pick 255.255.255.224 or is there a reason you're using it ( important this )


  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭pablo21


    Not sure why that subnet was used, it's been copied over from the first pc I guess, So if I change the subnet to end in 0 my problem will be solved then??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    Grand , if they're not part of a bigger network , change it to end in 0 on all the gear and it should work away.


  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭pablo21


    Thanks, and lets say the network was going to be bigger than 254 machines, what would that involve?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    pablo21 wrote:
    Thanks, and lets say the network was going to be bigger than 254 machines, what would that involve?

    A router and another netblock.

    e.g. 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭pablo21


    Thx for all your help folks!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,491 ✭✭✭Foxwood


    pablo21 wrote:
    Thanks, and lets say the network was going to be bigger than 254 machines, what would that involve?
    You could set the netmask to 255.255.254.0 and use 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x (or other blocks of consecutive addresses). This will allow you to have 500+ IP addresses on a single logical network, without a router.

    Google for "supernetting".


  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭pablo21


    Changed the mask to 255.255.255.0 on all machines today and everything seems to be working fine! Thanks for all your help!


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭axer


    pablo21 wrote:
    Thanks, and lets say the network was going to be bigger than 254 machines, what would that involve?
    You could just then change to a class B network address range using the 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255 ip address range (1,048,576 IP addresses).


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,815 ✭✭✭✭po0k


    Or perform auto-orthodontistry.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    Go mad altogether and use 10.0.0.0/8 but you will incur higher end of year ip tax


Advertisement