Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Subnetting

Options
2»

Comments

  • Options
    #32
    mcdonagh521
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9 ✭mcdonagh521


    Thanks!


  • Options
    #33
    OwenM
    Registered Users Posts: 859 ✭✭✭OwenM


    Why won't subnetting be used with ipv6 ?

    Just curious.


  • Options
    #34
    rmacm
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,039 ✭✭✭rmacm


    OwenM wrote: »
    Why won't subnetting be used with ipv6 ?

    Just curious.

    Eh what gave you that idea?


  • Options
    #35
    Moriarty
    Registered Users Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    I didn't know this was now the homework forum :)


  • Options
    #36
    accensi0n
    Registered Users Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    OwenM wrote: »
    Why won't subnetting be used with ipv6 ?

    Just curious.

    Subnetting is used with IPv6...


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #37
    Nalced_irl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭Nalced_irl


    dellas1979 wrote: »
    192.64.10.0/28, how many subnets and hosts can be calcluated

    OK. I worked it out as:

    n n h h
    192.64.10.0

    Gone into the last octet to get your 4 bits = 2 to power 4 - 2 = 14 subnets

    4 bits left = 2 to power 4 - 2 = 14

    14 subnets, 14 hosts.

    Am I correct? Any more I can practice on?

    I have the bloody Net+ exam tomorrow and this is a tough subject to get your head around. The 2 squared -2 approach to me anyway is the easiest to use. Tried other ways to see if it made it easier to work out how many hosts/subnets they could handle but always come back to this as the easiest to use.


Advertisement