Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

eircom to 25 meg next year??

Options
  • 18-11-2006 1:36pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,674 ✭✭✭


    For those who didnt see the irish times last week, eircom are planing to upgrade their broadband from 5mb to 25 mb sometime next year.
    Somehow i dont really see it happening,considering that they dont even offer 5mg at the moment unless you go for their bussiness package which is 170 euro a month,


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    Skatedude wrote:
    considering that they dont even offer 5mg at the moment unless you go for their bussiness package which is 170 euro a month,
    And trust me that doesn't even come close to 5 megs either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,339 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    I'd say they are thinking of the ADSL2+ BB that magnet offers up to 24mb.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 a line failure


    25 meg eircom BB is 100% Irish guaranteed, by the clumsy grace of Noel Dempsey, not going to happen. If by divine or EU intervention it does, rural Ireland wont see a (binary) bit of it.:mad:


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    If it does happen, expect it to be very expensive and to only be available to people that live in their phone exchange :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭abelard


    Cabaal wrote:
    If it does happen, expect it to be very expensive and to only be available to people that live in their phone exchange :)

    :D Made me laugh, but I feel bad for laughing, as it's at the utterly pathetic state of telecoms infrastructure in this country. :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭ethernet


    How about making sure everyone can get 1-2 Mbps first. Then up the speeds, Mr. Dempsey.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭qwertplaywert


    no, ethernet is right,all country should be coverd for 1 to 3 mbs before speed upgrades begin


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    adsl2 (2+) only does 24mbits max and then at about 10ft from the exchange so it cannot be adsl2 can it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭qwertplaywert


    maybe its an updated version?llmao


  • Registered Users Posts: 994 ✭✭✭JNive


    as said it would have to be some form of FTTC system for those speeds to get delivered to you via copper, since the copper needs to be very short.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    maybe its an updated version?llmao

    adsl2++ or adsl 2+rev2 or adsal2+ev2 or adsl3 , do tell us instead of lyao


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭qwertplaywert


    jesas dont have a fit


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,096 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    I pay 40 a month for 2meg up and down. Lets see what price Eircom offer this 25meg...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 44 DonalMcTavish


    no, ethernet is right,all country should be coverd for 1 to 3 mbs before speed upgrades begin


    i agree completely


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,491 ✭✭✭Foxwood


    i agree completely
    One of the reasons eircom took so long to roll out 512K ADSL was this attitude of complaining about the fact that some people could get it and others couldn't.

    You can complain about eircom holding the country back, or you can complain about eircom introducing new technology in areas where it makes financial sense, when other areas can't economically support older technologies.

    But you can't have it both ways - preventing the rollout of faster DSL speeds in built up areas until every last boreen has 1MB DSL will simply cause Ireland to fall further behind the rest of Europe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭qwertplaywert


    so?it promotes equality among all citizens.......maybe the rest of europe would learn something


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,491 ✭✭✭Foxwood


    so?it promotes equality among all citizens.......maybe the rest of europe would learn something
    Some equality - by your logic, eircom shouldn't have been allowed to roll out 512MB DSL until 2008.

    Maybe the M50 shouldn't be widened to 3 lanes until every other road in the country has been widened to 2?


  • Registered Users Posts: 666 ✭✭✭Prisoner6409


    I thought the summer was the Silly Season for Newspapers when then print any old rubbish, true or not. They must have extended it into December.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 920 ✭✭✭elvis2002


    Eircom is looking at IPTV at the moment as their next venture due to predicition in revenue losses in the coming years so it would make sense for them to be thinking about upgrading the access network at least.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Cabaal wrote:
    If it does happen, expect it to be very expensive and to only be available to people that live ...

    we were told by the eircom chairman last month that only the 5 main cities Galway Cork Waterford Limerick and Dublin were being upgraded to VDSL 25mbits and that there would be NO upgrades anywhere else.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 9,716 ✭✭✭CuLT


    so?it promotes equality among all citizens.......maybe the rest of europe would learn something
    What it does is make absolutely no economic sense whatsoever.

    Oh Socialism, when will you learn? rolleyes.gif


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭shortys94


    Shouldnt they just concentrate on getting 100% coverage. I mean there are people a mile down the road that can avail of broadband and I cannot, is thre anything I can do? Its a very rural area.


  • Registered Users Posts: 994 ✭✭✭JNive


    Its a very rural area.

    Thats why, its too expensive for them to ensure such level of availibility to most rural areas since the investment per capita in such places is huge in comparison to urban areas and the larger cities


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,432 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peteee


    shortys94 wrote:
    Shouldnt they just concentrate on getting 100% coverage. I mean there are people a mile down the road that can avail of broadband and I cannot, is thre anything I can do? Its a very rural area.

    Short of laying new lines, theres not much. Its a physical impossibility due to signal degradation etc over long distances.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    In other news:

    Pigs fly.
    Hell freezes over.
    George Bush stops calling everyone terists.


Advertisement