Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Vrt !

Options
  • 13-12-2006 3:15pm
    #1
    Sizzler
    Registered Users Posts: 5,430 ✭✭✭


    This has been doing the rounds ....


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Devon
    Registered Users Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭Devon


    Wasn't there something about the traffic corps having the power to seize foreign vehicles if the driver couldn't prove they were only a visitor or some such? I like the .pdf by the way. Thanks.


  • Options
    #3
    Tipsy Mac
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭Tipsy Mac


    Why would SIMI issue this when they are fully in favour of the current VRT system?


  • Options
    #4
    Anan1
    Registered Users Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Tipsy Mac wrote:
    Why would SIMI issue this when they are fully in favour of the current VRT system?
    Because they are fully in favour of the current VRT system.;)


  • Options
    #5
    jimmycrackcorm
    Registered Users Posts: 14,339 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    Perhaps the SIMI would like to guesstimate also how many of those cars could actually be legally re-registered by their owners without the need to pay VRT i.e. moving here from another country but leaving the re-registration for a long time. No extra VRT there!


  • Options
    #6
    Anan1
    Registered Users Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    jimmycrackcorm wrote:
    Perhaps the SIMI would like to guesstimate also how many of those cars could actually be legally re-registered by their owners without the need to pay VRT i.e. moving here from another country but leaving the re-registration for a long time. No extra VRT there!
    Good point, but a bit complex for the SIMI.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    seamus
    Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Tipsy Mac wrote:
    Why would SIMI issue this when they are fully in favour of the current VRT system?
    It's not an attack on VRT. It's an attack on the Revenue because they are fully within their power to seize a vehicle which has not had VRT paid on it, where required.


  • Options
    #8
    Tipsy Mac
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭Tipsy Mac


    seamus wrote:
    It's not an attack on VRT. It's an attack on the Revenue because they are fully within their power to seize a vehicle which has not had VRT paid on it, where required.

    Yes I misread it in my rage at any mention of SIMI and VRT in the same page :D


Advertisement