Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Company law question

  • 20-12-2006 3:58pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭


    Here's a query regarding company law for you; what is the position with regard to a company placing itself in a situation where its actions may be vetoed by a third party, where that third party is a private club not made up of the company's directors or shareholders? Are the directors not required to avoid such a situation as a result of their common law fiduciary duties to the company and/or its shareholders?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭dermot_sheehan


    It depends what you mean by "company", does it mean the company in general meeting or the directors. The directors have a duty not to fetter their discretion, so for example a director can't be bound to a contract to vote a certain way at a directors meeting as that would be fettering his discretion and interfering in his duty to act bona fides in the best interests of the company.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    No, I'm not thinking of a private contract between directors and third parties gabhain (you're right, they'd be in breach of common law duties and the companies act by doing that kind of thing), I was more thinking of situation where the board of ABC ltd. which has (say) a hundred shareholders, makes a legitimate decisions to enter the company into a private club (whose members would not include the hundred shareholders, or at least not a majority of them) which would be given powers of veto over board decisions, and which would be entitled to speak on behalf of ABC ltd.

    I mean, it yells "illegal" to me, but I can't nail down the specific articles it breaks.


Advertisement