Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Raid 0 Disaster...help

  • 13-01-2007 11:39pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 104 ✭✭


    On taking advice from a reply to a previous thread i have tried the create a raid 0 array

    After doing the whole f6 thingy and using a floppy to install the raid drivers, I get the following message

    setup cannot copy the file: idecoi.dll

    I have retried several times and if i skip the file i get the blue error screen..(oxoooooo7b (0xf7c8463c,0xc0000034,0x00000000,0x00000000)

    I really would appreciate some help please....

    Asus Crosshair MoBo

    Tnks eire_dd


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,757 ✭✭✭8T8


    If you are attempting to create a RAID 0 array it must be done in stages;

    Enable RAID support in bios
    Go into RAID bios and create RAID 0 array from selected HD's.
    Create driver disk with drivers for RAID controller or slipstream drivers into XP CD.

    Download the latest drivers from this link & extract to a folder (WinRAR will do it). There is even a PDF on that site outlining what to copy onto the floppy disk.

    Copy across the contents of IDE\WinXP\SATARAID onto the root of the floppy don't copy the folder just the files within the folder.

    If you are still having problems then try changing the floppy disk to another one in case it is damaged.

    (another possible reason though unlikely is bad RAM if you have done all of the above)

    This tool nLite will allow you to integrate the RAID drivers into an XP CD so it will not require them from a floppy disk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 104 ✭✭eire_dd


    ok gonna try the first method from the link....

    tyvm:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 104 ✭✭eire_dd


    Windows is now installing.......tnks a mill....:D


    Eire_dd


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    Make sure you have a regular backup in place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭SwampThing


    Second what BostonB says.

    Be prepared to lose EVERYTHING on the raidset if one HDD fails.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    it really bugs me all the warnings people spew out about "for the love of god man, you'll lose all your data with a RAID 0, run for the hills" Most people who build RAID0's nowadays, use drives that have at least a 3 year warrenty on them, are exactly the same make and model and are known to be reliable. A RAID 0 failing depends heavily on one or both of the drives failing. I personally have only ever had 1 drive in my 15 years of computer use fail, and that was a dusty 6 year old 5GB PATA drive.

    People should be backing up their data REGARDLESS of if they are using a RAID 0 or not. People assume that because you have 2 drives, the likelyhood of something going wrong is doubled. Well if the likelyhood of my drive failing in the next 5 years is 1/100,000 then i'll take my chances with 2/100,000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭SwampThing


    What has warranty got to do with it? Just because a company offers a warranty on a drive doesn't mean it absolutely won't fail in that time frame. And what do you do? Demand the company 'fix' your raidset because they offered a warranty and their drives are usually reliable? Get real!

    It's perfectly sound to mention the risk of RAID 0. You say RAID 0 'heavily depends' one one or both drives failing. I'm sure you're aware that RAID 0 can be made up of any amount of 2 or more drives and it ABSOLUTELY depends on ALL drives functioning. Losing one means losing the entire raidset.

    Personally, I've experienced several HDD failures - in work and at home - from laptops to SAN's - all makes and models of drives are vulnerable. You're obviously just very lucky.

    The point is, using RAID 0 without backup is riding that luck for all it's worth.

    I fully agree, people should be backing up their data regardless. You don't have to have RAID 0 to lose data. But for beginners or the inexperienced using RAID features that now come as standard on mainboards (something relatively new to th home PC market) it's got to be worth a mention, no?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭mukki


    yeah raid is great for os, apps and games, just save your pictures and cv elsewhere


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    SwampThing wrote:
    The point is, using RAID 0 without backup is riding that luck for all it's worth.

    I fully agree, people should be backing up their data regardless. You don't have to have RAID 0 to lose data. But for beginners or the inexperienced using RAID features that now come as standard on mainboards (something relatively new to th home PC market) it's got to be worth a mention, no?

    Yeah but when people are setting up a normal PC build, I never hear anybody remind the person to factor in backing up their data, its like its assumed of people running a normal set up, yet people who want to set up a RAID 0 "must be careless" therefore need reminding. There is NO situation EVER where you shouldn't be backing up important data on a computer, regardless of set up. It's just becoming clíched that whenever somebody announces they are putting together a RAID0 somebody has to scramble in and warn them to be prepared to lose everything, and to back up until the cows come home.

    Fact of the matter is you are warning someone on the basis of probability, a probability which you have not calculated but made assumptions on. Say he is setting up a RAID 0 with 2 drives that have been tested to have a failure rate in 5 years of 1/2million. So the probability of setting up 2 drives in a RAID 0 of them failing in 5 years is 1/1million. Would you feel the need to warn a person against something with those odds? My point, there are odds that when I get on a plane, probably higher than that of a HDD failing, it will crash. But when I post a thread about going on a flight nobody feels the need to warn me to take out life insurence due to the assumed probabilities of such an event.

    Also warrenties are not the defacto lifespan of a drive, but for a company to offer such a thing they have to be pretty sure of themselves that their drives won't fail within that timeframe, otherwise it would be company suicide. WD even offer 5 year warrenties on some of their drives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭SwampThing


    I hear what you're saying and you've make some good points but I still think, for users who can now easily setup a radiset and maybe don't understand exactly what they're doing, it's worth a mention.

    If it bugs you that much, well maybe you should avoid threads dealing with RAID. It obviously upsets you a great deal and that can't be healthy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,640 ✭✭✭Gillie


    Disk space is for nothing these days!
    IMO you need a pretty damn good reason NOT to use RAID (At least mirroring).

    That thing about the warrenty means feck all as previously stated!
    Warrenty's don't mean shít!


Advertisement