Boardsies at war!!! PLO 1/2 hand

5starpool

eoghan104 wrote:

Ok this is fair enough to point out and i was wrong in the way i played the hand.

Why didnt you give this analysis in the first place instead of jumping in feet first saying that "i only posted because i won" and " i disagreed with everyone saying i was right and they were wrong" when none of it was true?

In fairness though Eoghan, if he had 77xx with spades and you lost then you would not have posted this hand. I know you only say you posted it as yourself and Neil disagreed. but that wouldn't have arisen if you had been crippled on the flop.

Lazare

musician wrote:

as opposed to trying to bask in the sun coming out of RT's arse.

I love it Muso, had a genuine LOL there.

jimbling

5starpool wrote:

In fairness though Eoghan, if he had 77xx with spades and you lost then you would not have posted this hand. I know you only say you posted it as yourself and Neil disagreed. but that wouldn't have arisen if you had been crippled on the flop.

I think people are been a bit hard on Eoghan here. I mean I was the first to question what advice he was asking for, but I do think he was genuinely looking for help. He was wondering if he made the right call because obviously careca thought he didnt.
When everyone disagreed he just tried to defend it be stressing the read for the reason. Then, instead of putting down the post, I think the point should have been a disagreement with his read, which I think most would/did.
So analysis provided.

Eoghan, take on the advice that hands like these can cost a lot of money, and you should have folded... even with strong read.

eoghan104

5starpool wrote:

In fairness though Eoghan, if he had 77xx with spades and you lost then you would not have posted this hand. I know you only say you posted it as yourself and Neil disagreed. but that wouldn't have arisen if you had been crippled on the flop.

Yeh i dunno Dom but that has nothing to do with what Im talking about here and it is a completley differnt hand altogether!!! What RT suggested is that I only posted because I won.......... but i still would have posted if a spade had of hit the turn and i lost the hand.

eoghan104

jimbling wrote:

I think people are been a bit hard on Eoghan here. I mean I was the first to question what advice he was asking for, but I do think he was genuinely looking for help. He was wondering if he made the right call because obviously careca thought he didnt.
When everyone disagreed he just tried to defend it be stressing the read for the reason. Then, instead of putting down the post, I think the point should have been a disagreement with his read, which I think most would/did.
So analysis provided.

Eoghan, take on the advice that hands like these can cost a lot of money, and you should have folded... even with strong read.

Thanks Jim and all the advice has been taken on board. I dont mind people telling me i played a hand wrong that is the reason for posting. I just didnt like the attitude that i only posted the hand because i won and to brag when that was not the case. Careca has already said it was his idea to post the hand. The attitude from some peole here who think there so much Fcuking better than everyone else really just pisses me off sometimes and then people pipe up to back them up when its clear they are just licking the others arse! Maybe Im wrong but thats the impression I get.

Bandana boy

eoghan104 wrote:

Yeh i dunno Dom but that has nothing to do with what Im talking about here and it is a completley differnt hand altogether!!! What RT suggested is that I only posted because I won.......... but i still would have posted if a spade had of hit the turn and i lost the hand.

Eoghan
Even reading him 100% correctly (which is not possible in my mind you at best can put him on a range )you ended up getting all your chips in with no statistical advantage behind against anything except the very bottom of his re-raising range
you got lucky but it was a bad play

If 1 of the many turns and river that beats you hits and natural order returns to the universe I very much doubt this hand is disscused

But that said you have generated some discussion so good post

5starpool

Well in future just don't do this unless you are playing me, ok? Cheers

eoghan104

Bandana boy wrote:

Eoghan
Even reading him 100% correctly (which is not possible in my mind you at best can put him on a range )you ended up getting all your chips in with no statistical advantage behind against anything except the very bottom of his re-raising range
you got lucky but it was a bad play

If 1 of the many turns and river that beats you hits and natural order returns to the universe I very much doubt this hand is disscused

But that said you have generated some discussion so good post

I 100% post this if a spade falls...........

jimbling

eoghan104 wrote:

I 100% post this if a spade falls...........

Yes, but as someone already mentioned... do you post if you were absolutely crushed on the flop???

i.e. lets say your read was completely wrong and careca has a set + the spade draw....Do you post asking were you right to make the call?

Think thats what people are getting at. The answer is certainly no, but the same can be said for a large amount of posts here... just seems yours generated the discussion on it.

Solksjaer

eoghan104 wrote:

The attitude from some peole here who think there so much Fcuking better than everyone else really just pisses me off sometimes and then people pipe up to back them up when its clear they are just licking the others arse! Maybe Im wrong but thats the impression I get.

LOL, You sound like a sensy just like me and JD from scrubs.
But if you put your fingies in the pirhana tank you get them bitten off.

FWIW. It's probably obvious to the fair minded that you weren't posting to brag about this hand. In the main I think you know how you played it, A pair preflop in Omaha is ok, postflop against strength is not worth bothering about especially considering even if you are ahead (unlikely) you probably will be caught up, not worth it even if 200 is not much to ya.


PS. You are right there is a lot of unhealthy howsyerfather bonding about this place when a choosen one speaks .......stay lively lad, stay livey:) ,

and before anyone says it (AGAIN) , I lifted the ban on myself, 1. for good behaviour and 2. becuase lurking makes me feel kinda dirty. (ooh matron) and 3. the silent majority just love me.. Now FECK OFF.

rgds

the tard

eoghan104

Solksjaer wrote:

LOL, You sound like a sensy just like me and JD from scrubs.

To be compared to the great one is a true honour. JD that is!!

Solksjaer

eoghan104 wrote:

To be compared to the great one is a true honour. JD that is!!

Dr Cox is (IN FACT NEWBIE) the great one