Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

ntfs-3g, Ubuntu and Vista

  • 19-03-2007 11:40am
    #1
    joe_chicken
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭


    Ok, I've trawled the Ubuntu forums, and it seems nobody really has a problem with ntfs-3g.... I unfortunately haven't been so lucky

    So, I'm gonna see if any of you clever people on boards can sort me out :)

    Here's my setup:
    3 SATA drives
    2 disk RAID 0 array with Vista installed
    and 1 single SATA with Ubuntu

    When I do an fdisk -l (from Ubuntu), I see: 
    /dev/sda2   *           7        1312    10485760    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda3            1312       38904   301959168    7  HPFS/NTFS

    But then when I try putting 
    /dev/sda2 /media/windows ntfs-3g defaults,locale=en_US.utf8 0 0
    in /etc/fstab, mount -a gives me 
    NTFS signature is missing.
Failed to startup volume: Invalid argument
Failed to mount '/dev/sda2': Invalid argument
The device '/dev/sda2' doesn't have a valid NTFS.
Maybe you selected the wrong device? Or the whole disk instead of a
partition (e.g. /dev/hda, not /dev/hda1)? Or the other way around?

    I have ntfs-3g 1.0, the machine is originally a Dell, so whether the way they partitioned is messing it up, I'm not sure (don't really want to repartition the whole machine)

    Any help appreciated, thanks.


Advertisement