about boards bans for abuse

WhiteWashMan

green123 wrote:

i am not greatly mistaken or lying.

so you think its fair that some of us get warned and told to be nice for complaining about a thread title, while the person who posted the stupid thread title and called us idiots and saps hears no more about it ?

he is allowed to go on posting stupid thread titles and continue to call people idiots and saps

you are completely right. he will go on posting stupid threads titles and calling people idiots for complaining about the stupid thread titles.

i can say it again for you if you want, just in case you felt the need to make the same point again?

WhiteWashMan

green123 wrote:

the problem isnt the idiot thing.

the problem is that some of us get warned and told to be nice for complaining about a thread title, while the person who posted the stupid thread title and called us idiots and saps hears no more about it

i told everyone to shut up, so technically speaking, they did hear more about it, which makes this another inaccurate post by you.

green123

WhiteWashMan wrote:

i told everyone to shut up, so technically speaking, they did hear more about it, which makes this another inaccurate post by you.

no this is not another inaccurate post by me.

to make another inaccurate post i would have had to make at least one previous inaccurate post and i have not made any inaccurate posts yet .

therefore youre post is inaccurate.

he almost certainly has not read the thread since.
so technically he has heard no more about it .

copacetic

green123 wrote:

he almost certainly has not read the thread since.
so technically he has heard no more about it .

this looks to be inaccurate. technically you have no idea who
has and hasn't read the thread. So technically you are talking rubbish.
Lets all misuse technically in non technical situations. yay!

muffler

green123 wrote:

no this is not another inaccurate post by me.

to make another inaccurate post i would have had to make at least one previous inaccurate post and i have not made any inaccurate posts yet .

therefore youre post is inaccurate..

Try saying that 3 times after 17 vodkas

WhiteWashMan

green123 wrote:

no this is not another inaccurate post by me.

to make another inaccurate post i would have had to make at least one previous inaccurate post and i have not made any inaccurate posts yet .

therefore youre post is inaccurate.

he almost certainly has not read the thread since.
so technically he has heard no more about it .

ok, so if i get the person who used the term idiot as a generalisation, to read the last post, and make sure they are also told to shut up, will that make a difference?

green123

copacetic wrote:

this looks to be inaccurate. technically you have no idea who
has and hasn't read the thread. So technically you are talking rubbish.
Lets all misuse technically in non technical situations. yay!

i agree.
we dont know who has read the thread.
thats why i said almost certainly, not certainly.

it is most likely that the person has not read the thread since, so therefore i am right in more cases than the white wash man

copacetic

WhiteWashMan wrote:

ok, so if i get the person who used the term idiot as a generalisation, to read the last post, and make sure they are also told to shut up, will that make a difference?

Maybe you can get a banner ad?

green123

WhiteWashMan wrote:

ok, so if i get the person who used the term idiot as a generalisation, to read the last post, and make sure they are also told to shut up, will that make a difference?

no that would not make much difference.

it was not just a generalisation.
it is clear that he was specifically referring to me and the others that complained about his stupid thread title.

green123

copacetic wrote:

Maybe you can get a banner ad?

yes a banner ad telling people to post relevant titles to threads

WhiteWashMan

green123 wrote:

no that would not make much difference.

it was not just a generalisation.
it is clear that he was specifically referring to me and the others that complained about his stupid thread title.

well, it seems we are still disagreeing. keep at it though, i can go all day.

it wont change anything, and if you are still outraged at the inhumanity of it all, then you can pm an admin and tell them that im an awful mod, and that mods are all power hungry whores, and that you are disgusted that someone generalised about idiots, and you took it to heart.

perhaps an smod will over rule me? you could ask them as well? in fact, while i am getting a banner made up to make sure the OP of the original post has seen my telling him to shut up as well as everyone else, you could do the same.

im still curious though as to what is going to make you feel better. i dont want you to continue your journey though life feeling inferior because someone wasnt banned on an internet forum for calling everyone who complained about a thread title an idiot.

oscarBravo

FFS.

There isn't a gathering card or owl picture sarcastic enough for this crap.

Asok

oscarBravo

Nope, sorry sok - still doesn't quite capture the urge I feel to yell "STFU!! STFU!! ST****ing ****U!!!" at my screen.

r3nu4l

This is still going on? !!!111 omg, wtf, lol, etc.

/yawns and leaves

6th

green123, I dont see what it is you have a problem with? No one refered to you directly.

Doodee

oscarBravo wrote:

Nope, sorry sok - still doesn't quite capture the urge I feel to yell "STFU!! STFU!! ST****ing ****U!!!" at my screen.

this help?

DonkeyStyle \o/

No more apples in the vending machine please.

randylonghorn

oscarBravo wrote:

Nope, sorry sok - still doesn't quite capture the urge I feel to yell "STFU!! STFU!! ST****ing ****U!!!" at my screen.

This any better?

amp

Everybody who has posted in this thread and will post to it is an idiot.

Especially me.

WhiteWashMan

if i was a dog, id be doing bow wow wow noises right now.

Nevyn

What and not licking your own balls ?

copacetic

WhiteWashMan wrote:

if i was a dog, id be doing bow wow wow noises right now.

sure go ahead, you can do the noises, I know you can.

WhiteWashMan

Thaedydal wrote:

What and not licking your own balls ?

oh god. janet. if only.if only.#and dont you even suggest you wouldnt do it if you could!

Nevyn

I don't have those type of 'balls', Emo I mean eamo but emo eamo doest have a certain ring to it.

the_syco

Hagar wrote:

Mods are not bots we sleep and live too.

Blasphemy!!! I don't pay monies for them to burn the wax, and stay on all nights!!onehundredandeleven!!!!!!!

DeVore

I actually felt my IQ drop reading this thread. It has 24 hours to live before I execute ULTIMATA POWA on its ass!!

DeV.

InFront

Isn't there anything more dramatic than locking it? It's a bit like a detonator clock counting backwards to zero and then giving a 'click'.

Explosion maybe?

Boston

So when a suer reports a post, all moderators can he that report?

Hagar

eYs.