WM Main Event Spoiled

kentonbomb

The Main Event For Tomorrows Wrestlemania 23 in Detroit Will Be None Other Than John Cena Defending His WWE Title Against Shawn Michaels,The Undertaker Is Suposed to be Pissed With This Decision,I Think Its Unfair,I Thought Whoever wins the Royal Rumble Main Evens Wrestlemania Oviously not,i am sick of John Cena Main Eventing Every Wrestlemania,What are You Thoughts

Fozzy

My thoughts are that you should have used more than one sentence to tell us that

The main event of WM should be a title match. It should also be the best match. Cena and Michaels are more capable of having a great match than Undertaker and Batista are. So Cena and Michaels should be the main event

Remember when Jericho defended his belt against HHH in the main event at WM? Remember how the biggest match had gone before it, Hogan vs Rock? The main event was a good match, but it was a bit of a come-down. I think it would be a lot like that if they put Taker and Batista on last

John Cena will have only main evented 2 WM's, so I can't see how you can be sick of him main-eventing them already

Minto

I don't think its gonna ruin 'Mania, Michaels and Cena will put on a great match. I think Batista/'Taker would have been a great main event, but it wouldn't have stolen the show. Hopefully, Cena/Michaels will do that (aslong as it doesn't end it DQ or Cena using the STFU).

kentonbomb

i just think it's unfair that the undertaker won the rumble and he's not main eventing W/M

J.R.HARTLEY

didn't rey mysterio have to wrestle the undercard when he won the rumble too

Fozzy

But Undertaker winning the Rumble wasn't some great feat that he pulled out himself. Vince decided that Taker would win the Rumble and challenge for a title, same way he decided that Shawn would challenge for a title. I don't remember WWE saying recently that the Rumble winner gets to main-event WM. Plus, what if Batista is due to win? There's no way they'd let that go on last, as it would end the ppv on a sour note

nacho libre

Fozzy wrote:

But Undertaker winning the Rumble wasn't some great feat that he pulled out himself. Vince decided that Taker would win the Rumble and challenge for a title, same way he decided that Shawn would challenge for a title. I don't remember WWE saying recently that the Rumble winner gets to main-event WM. Plus, what if Batista is due to win? There's no way they'd let that go on last, as it would end the ppv on a sour note

Maybe not but the commentators, after he had won the Rumble, said that he-Undertaker-would be headlining...

Well, Undertaker and Batista can use this as motivation to try and eclipsed the main event-It's not likely but i think they will surprise a few people.

Vince135792003

nacho libre wrote:

Well, Undertaker and Batista can use this as motivation to try and eclipsed the main event-It's not likely but i think they will surprise a few people.

The crowd will help alot.

de5p0i1er

I was pissed to see that match so early on in the card. They should have had it on last, I'm sick of Cena.

kentonbomb

Taker Match Was Better Than Cena's