Chelsea-v-United

PHB · 10-05-2007 1:29pm

Mikel fee is also off PHB. Its potential fee rather than real fee you've put in so if your doing the real fee for a united player at least keep it consistent for Chelsea as well.

I was under the impression it was 12 million to United 6 to Lyn. I could well be wrong though.

astrofool · 10-05-2007 1:30pm

afaik, mikel's fee is not appearance or win based, but simply over the course of a couple of years (like every other soccer fee for a player), and it was 4m til Lyn last I heard.

herbieflowers · 10-05-2007 2:09pm

PHB wrote:

I was under the impression it was 12 million to United 6 to Lyn. I could well be wrong though.

that's what I thought...

PHB · 10-05-2007 3:01pm

According to sky it was indeed 4 million, but that seems rather odd, as initally, United paid 6 million for his services.

leninbenjamin · 10-05-2007 4:39pm

PHB wrote:

According to sky it was indeed 4 million, but that seems rather odd, as initally, United paid 6 million for his services.

was it 6 million? i thought i remember it was 3 or 4 being mentioned at the time. maybe the whole confusion rest over it being reported as £4m/€6m.

shatners basoon · 10-05-2007 4:43pm

the euro pound thing really confuses matters when it comes to figures, i bet agents use it to their advantage to fool foreign footballers with little knowledge of our strange ways!

Vokes · 10-05-2007 5:24pm

Yeh, from looking around it looks like its £6mil to ManU & £2mil to Lyn last summer, and then this summer the same again to both clubs.

Chelsea-v-United

Comments