3DMARK Scores!?

dazftw

Post them if you got them

2005: 18363

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&XLID=0&UID=9315881

2006: 10821

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9192029

Anti

I shall post these up tomorrow.

dazftw

I should try 06.. im back on xp now and I got higher in 05 than I did on vista...

riptide

Still chugging away on a stock cooled X1900XT.

6934

hopeful

2006: 6166

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/r...UID=9320023

Somewhat hampered by my X1900xt.

Interestingly my CPU score of 2442 is only one point behind yours DeafVison. Guess my little E6320 ain't doing too bad!

hopeful

Cranked up the GPU clock speeds a bit...

2006: 6586

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/....=9320330

dazftw

hopeful wrote:

Interestingly my CPU score of 2442 is only one point behind yours DeafVison. Guess my little E6320 ain't doing too bad!

Whats it clocked at?

riptide

Not bad hopeful... see can ya get up towards mine. We seem to have similar HW. See can you max it out... I'm sure theres more to come.

hopeful

DeafVision wrote:

Whats it clocked at?

2800mhz ATM

Hits a wall at 2870....won't even post higher than this.

hopeful

riptide wrote:

Not bad hopeful... see can ya get up towards mine. We seem to have similar HW. See can you max it out... I'm sure theres more to come.

Except your 6600 is clocked just a tad higher than my 6320!

My card is at 668/792 so should have a few more mhz in it I think Time to crank up ATI Tray Tools!

awhir

2006:11373

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1990360

2005:19243

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3051203

riptide

hopeful wrote:

Except your 6600 is clocked just a tad higher than my 6320!

My card is at 668/792 so should have a few more mhz in it I think Time to crank up ATI Tray Tools!

ha ya! Juat a tad.

What resolution is your 3dmark test done in?

hopeful

riptide wrote:

ha ya! Juat a tad.

What resolution is your 3dmark test done in?

The standard test res of 1280x1024

Anti

2006: 9334

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9322308

Had to lower the cpu down to 2700Mhz as it is stupidly hot up here today. And im running the stock NB cooler which is hitting 69c.

Interestingly enough. The opty isnt that far behind the c2d. Hopefully when i pick up the W/C gear up from hopeful next friday i can run at 3ghz all the time.

*Edit*

2006: 10290

Upped the cpu from 2700 to 2850.

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9322794
Am installing 2005 now.

2005: 13924

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&XLID=0&UID=9322574

Really need to ramp up the cpu for this one. And i dont think my new nvidia drievrs ( 158.22 ) are helping at all. So ill find a better performing one later.

2003: 30000ish

riptide

hopeful wrote:

The standard test res of 1280x1024

Right... I'm going to try and do a few loops of it and see what becomes of it.

papu

658 with an X600 and 1.5 gigs O Ram and a p4@3.0


New rig in july :rolleyes: :eek:

sebastianlieken

'06 - 8371

this really goes to show how much this mobo is holding me back as i have the same graphics card (i think, not sure whether he has the 320 or 640) as awhir and a e6600 as opposed to an e6420 that awhir has, hes gettin 11373.

i want a proper overclockin mobo

awhir

sebastianlieken wrote:

'06 - 8371

this really goes to show how much this mobo is holding me back as i have the same graphics card (i think, not sure whether he has the 320 or 640) as awhir and a e6600 as opposed to an e6420 that awhir has, hes gettin 11373.

i want a proper overclockin mobo

well my cpu is at 3.6 and my gfx is at 635/1000

sebastianlieken

awhir wrote:

well my cpu is at 3.6 and my gfx is at 635/1000

ya i could see that on the link, was jus pointin out wat i could be gettin if i had a half decent mobo to overclock with. i just wanted to emphasize the point of how much i hate my msi p965 neo mobo....

Anti

Im just happy my Opty is keping up with you lot. Gonna have to go mad and push the GTX past 628/1030

dazftw

awhir wrote:

well my cpu is at 3.6 and my gfx is at 635/1000

Is that on air or water?

awhir

DeafVision wrote:

Is that on air or water?

air and aint going over 60c.

gona push for 6800 tomorrow.

anti:my old 939 set up got 9*** in 3d mark 06.got no links since you can only save 5

Anti

awhir wrote:

air and aint going over 60c.

gona push for 6800 tomorrow.

anti:my old 939 set up got 9*** in 3d mark 06.got no links since you can only save 5

Yes. im at 10329. Also what drivers are you using?

awhir

not shure what nivida.
dont have any hot fix ethir for the coreduo is there 1 ?

christophicus

sebastianlieken wrote:

'06 - 8371

this really goes to show how much this mobo is holding me back as i have the same graphics card (i think, not sure whether he has the 320 or 640) as awhir and a e6600 as opposed to an e6420 that awhir has, hes gettin 11373.

i want a proper overclockin mobo

Well your sig says you have a 320 MB varient of the card.

ricka05

Hi ,
it would be nice if you could post your pc spec.,so we could see the differences.

Anti

They are mostly in our sigs.

hopeful

Anti wrote:

They are mostly in our sigs.

But yours is so damn small my old man eyes can't read it

Anti

LOL

Surely on that lovely 24" screen you should be able to see it

awhir

Anti wrote:

LOL

Surely on that lovely 24" screen you should be able to see it

ya it is abit small .

hopeful

Small?? I need a microscope!

TerrorFirmer

2006 - 4700, with 6400 at 2.5ghz, 2gb ram and x1800xt

BadCharlie

2006 = 4986

No screen pic.
Using rig 2 from sig.


Cpu at 2560mhz
Video Card Clocked as far as she goes.

Anti

im sure you could push that 3700+ a bit further with the ram you have. Could probably add another 600-1000 points onto it with a nice overclock

TerrorFirmer

Cpu doesn't make a huge difference anyway. If I overclock my machine by 500mhz I only get about 180-200 extra cpu score.

I tried 3dmark yesterday morning with my temporary X800 and I got something like 1,200 overall....I didn't realise that the graphics card was the main importance to that extent:o

Anti

I get 1500 when i overlcock the opty from 2.5ghz to 2.95ghz. The cpu score dosent go up much. but the fps in the other tests ddoes. and gives a better score.

Chosen

Here's 12792 with my 8800GTS (single card).

Specs are:
Quad @3820MHz
2Gb Cellshock D9 @ 1150MHz
8800GTS @ 660/1950


Also, guys can you try posting the compare url from ORB and not the project's url, cause people who are logged on (e.g. myself) can't see anything. It's like I am trying to re-submit your score

This is what it should look like:
[PHP]http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1891072[/PHP]
This is what it should NOT look like:
[PHP]http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&XLID=0&UID=9315881[/PHP]
Cheers

riptide

Hmm... I looped 3Dmark again... scores didn't budge much. Hmmmm. I seem to be getting poor SM2 SM3 scores. hmmmm. Well relatively poor compared to clocks. Perhaps its because of too high clocks? Also the card was on its ragged edge. Artifacts were common. hmmm.

BadCharlie

Anti wrote:

im sure you could push that 3700+ a bit further with the ram you have. Could probably add another 600-1000 points onto it with a nice overclock

Yeah your right it will clock a little bit more maybe 60mhz but then gets very unstable. What the problem is, is my motherboard its v.core options is crap and will only output 1.4 max.

Why i got this motherboard is cause it had AGP and PCI-E ports which was handy for a while. I knew before buying that clocking would be reduced on this board.

hopeful

There are a couple of mods you can do to the Dual-SATAII to get a higher Vcore.

Loads of info HERE on this board plus the volt mod stuff.

BadCharlie

hopeful wrote:

There are a couple of mods you can do to the Dual-SATAII to get a higher Vcore.

Loads of info HERE on this board plus the volt mod stuff.

Will take a look thanks.

TonyM.

3d mark 05 12401 using 7900 gtx.

BattlingCheese

Mmm 5499 3dMark 2006

Is this kinda low? Only 1 system reference on 3DMarks web site

Intel Core 2 Quad 2667 MHz
ATI RADEON X1950 PRO
2GB DDR2 - 6400
Gigabyte 965P-DS3

TerrorFirmer

No, not really. Get a better card to see higher results....cpu doesn't affect score remotely near as much, the card will decide your score, yours is pretty budget midrange

Anti

That is actually a pretty low score. I was getting that with a 1950pro and a opty 170 @ 2.8ghz

Cassiel

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2064182

was tinkering with the 7900gs's yesterday, voltmods and such. They'll pass the nvidia test at higher frequencies, but are then not ATI tool stable.

Can't get aircooling to do the cpu justice though. It will SuperPi at 4.0Ghz on air, stock FSB, just won't do anything else at 4.0Ghz!

Nice scores out there

Anti

Good going for a 7900gs mate

Inquitus

9311 run in Feb 2006

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=113226

jonny72

4300 in 3dmark06 with a computer I put together for 500, not overclocked..

core2duo 6400 2.13
2 gig 667 ram
7900 gs
crap 300w psu

TerrorFirmer

8509 in '06 now that I finally got an 8800GTS...

WillieDH

Mines 7600 on the 2005 version

System

3.2Ghz, HT P4
1024MB RAM
Xtreme Vision 8800GTS 320MB

Kinda low ?!

Weird thing is that there is a software tool that came with the card and when you push the performace meters up the 3D mark drops by > 10%