Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Major swing in election for Fianna Fail - Rainbow down 4%

Options
13»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭wow sierra


    mfitzy wrote:
    I thought RTE news coverage last night particularly was almost bordering on the hysterical re FF up in the polls.
    They were pictured celebrating at their HQ with balloons and streamers etc; exactly like they add actually won the election. I found that sickening and galvanised me more to go out and vote against them Thursday!

    And we all know the story of the tortoise and the hare....

    Unfortunate reference to the tortoise and the hare - in this story Fianna Fáil are the Tortoise - The rainbow were acting like it was sown up last week!!!!!

    As regards the RTE coverage what did you want - a little footnote at the end of the Bulletin???? People have been on the edge of their seats waiting for this poll since Thurs nights debate.

    This poll does not say Fianna Fáil will win - it just gives them huge momentum and encouragement to push on at this stage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,645 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    Voipjunkie wrote:
    Brilliant except undecideds are on 15% unchanged

    honestly it is silly to be predicting the outcome of the election based on one poll

    I completely agree on your second point but your first one is fallacious. It could be that (and I don't necessarily think this) there was a shift of undecided to FF and a shift from FG and Lab to undecided after the debates. You'd have no net change in undecided voters but there would be a voter shift.

    Not that I agree with The White Rose or anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    i think the poll is accurate. the weekend poll showed ff up 1/2%-lets take an average of 1.5%. they were conducted over three days, only one of which was after the debate. i.e the 1.5% increase could have been recorded on the final day. in the most recent poll the vote was after the debate, all of it and was 5% or close enough to 4.5% or 1.5x3


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43 joecoote


    As polls go, this one shows the upper most range that FF will get in terms of votes. Even on upper most limit, FF is going to need partners. PD's are in trouble, big time. If there is even a percentage point or two slippage from this OP, then FF is going to need much more than the PD's meagre return. See how it goes. It all down to preferences now.

    Predictions:

    1. News stories (leaks?) on Republican (perceived?) criminality to become prominent. This is the easiest party to from which to keep preferences going to. All parties will believe they will benefit from such a tactic.

    2. Attacks (scare-mongering?) on Green Party policies.

    3. Message (media or otherwise): a vote for an independent is a wasted vote.

    4. Down and dirty rumour-mongering at constituency level. Should be one or two real dirty tricks pulled.

    5. FF upper echelon to act Presidential. Don't expect anything substantial on policies; just some sound-bites. Main message: it's the economy (mortgage repayments), stupid.

    Question: Have Bertie and McDowell been seen hugging in public lately? Will we see the coalition partners in a photo op before the election?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32 The White Rose


    Not that I agree with The White Rose or anything.

    Thank God for that!

    Watching the debate the other day, it does seem that Bertie has that very rare star quality. Clinton had it and would have been re elected if the constitution had allowed him to run a third time

    Kenny doesn't and I cant help feeling that people prefer to have Ahern representing them at home and abroad


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭PH01


    joecoote wrote:
    As polls go, this one shows the upper most range that FF will get in terms of votes. Even on upper most limit, FF is going to need partners.
    41% was the adjusted figure in today's opinion poll? This being the case then it hard to say if this is their upper limit.
    An amazing figure to get all the same and at the right time too.
    joecoote wrote:
    PD's are in trouble, big time. If there is even a percentage point or two slippage from this OP, then FF is going to need much more than the PD's meagre return. See how it goes.
    Yes, but we shouldn't write off the PDs. They were down to 2 or 3 seats before and they came back.
    Who know what they could do if they had a different leader, or if Mick McDowell was less abrasive?

    joecoote wrote:
    It all down to preferences now.
    Yip. And a good opinion poll will be reflected in the transfers. Bertie's performance last Thursday night did the party's candidates the world of good.
    joecoote wrote:
    1. News stories (leaks?) on Republican (perceived?) criminality to become prominent. This is the easiest party to from which to keep preferences going to. All parties will believe they will benefit from such a tactic.
    FF, the Republican Party, involved with criminality?! Never!
    joecoote wrote:
    2. Attacks (scare-mongering?) on Green Party policies.
    That's been done hasn't it? And most of it true (let's see then deny it ;) ).
    joecoote wrote:
    3. Message (media or otherwise): a vote for an independent is a wasted vote.
    Quite a few of them will have a battle to get elected in their own right - ref: JHR in South Kerry
    joecoote wrote:
    4. Down and dirty rumour-mongering at constituency level. Should be one or two real dirty tricks pulled.
    That sort of thing goes on all the time and not only when there's an election.
    joecoote wrote:
    5. FF upper echelon to act Presidential. Don't expect anything substantial on policies; just some sound-bites. Main message: it's the economy (mortgage repayments), stupid.
    Indeed. You can almost hear then chanting "5 More Years"!
    joecoote wrote:
    Question: Have Bertie and McDowell been seen hugging in public lately? Will we see the coalition partners in a photo op before the election?
    Unlikely. Bertie will be doing his best to just associate with winners.

    Anyway, McDowell on the other hand will be too busy with his posters over the next 48 hours or so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    If, by those figures, it now stands at 43% a piece between FF/PD and FG/Lab/GP, would there be independents sway it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Thank God for that!

    Watching the debate the other day, it does seem that Bertie has that very rare star quality. Clinton had it and would have been re elected if the constitution had allowed him to run a third time

    Now that is a joke, even if one were to claim that Ahern won the debate, it cannot be said that he won it well or that he displayed any real force of character or charisma. Instead he took pot shots and tried to pick at numerical weaknesses. He did not come across as having any sort of star quality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    , even if one were to claim that Ahern won the debate, it cannot be said that he won it well QUOTE]
    i disagree wholeheartedly. enda lost in alomost every area. he even lost in health. the people have seen this and its reflected in the post debate poll


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    Voipjunkie wrote:
    Brilliant except undecideds are on 15% unchanged

    honestly it is silly to be predicting the outcome of the election based on one poll


    Undeciders tend not to vote in the election itself. At this point in the election, the vast majority of people who intend on voting have made their minds up. It's all about making sure they vote now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    ateam wrote:
    Undeciders tend not to vote in the election itself. At this point in the election, the vast majority of people who intend on voting have made their minds up. It's all about making sure they vote now.

    Is that based on anything or is it speculation?

    Personally im still trying to make my mind up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Voipjunkie


    Now that is a joke, even if one were to claim that Ahern won the debate, it cannot be said that he won it well or that he displayed any real force of character or charisma. Instead he took pot shots and tried to pick at numerical weaknesses. He did not come across as having any sort of star quality.


    I am not a FFer

    But tbh Bertie danced rings around Enda

    He caught him out on the under 5 medical card when the simple answer is that even if no child alive now will benefit when it is in it will benefit all children and it is better than FF solution which is to do nothing.

    He caught him out on the tax issue where he effectively got enda to say that FG favoured tax breaks for the most wealthy in society

    He caught him out on the hospital beds issue


    That is 3 main issues of the top of my head

    Enda did not seem capable of understanding the angle that bertie was coming from and was completely incapable of heading him off.


    As I said I am not a FFer I will not be voting for FF


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭Lennoxschips


    bertie talked louder and talked over enda and miriam, if people want to construe this as him having won the debate, then so be it. personally, i wasn't impressed
    He caught him out on the under 5 medical card when the simple answer is that even if no child alive now will benefit when it is in it will benefit all children and it is better than FF solution which is to do nothing.

    yes, but bertie's point here was stupid and irrelevant.
    He caught him out on the tax issue where he effectively got enda to say that FG favoured tax breaks for the most wealthy in society

    ...while fianna fail have been lowering the top tax rate for years. bertie has some neck. once again, i wasn't impressed.
    He caught him out on the hospital beds issue

    the media are concentrating on this for some reason, but bertie's assertion that there is no crisis in the health service went unnoticed


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    And that, Lennoxchips, is where Ahern beat Kenny. Kenny wasnt able to hammer his points, and yet, its like so may other times in the Dail.

    I still hark back to last Sept/Oct, at "Bertiegate 1". Enda had Ahern on his knees, but he gave Bertie a lot of slack. What we saw on Thursday night was more of the same.

    Enda looked like he needed backup. In the Dail, when Leaders Questions are on, the two front benches barrack each other, cheerleaders for each side, Dick Roache and Bernard Durkin jawwing at each other across the floor, tubthumping, and all before the Ceann Comhairle rings his bell and we all sit down. Kenny looked like he needed support.

    And for that reason, personally, the impression I get is that Labour and Pat Rabbitte would walk all over him in government (unless FG get more than 60 seats.)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think if people look back at that debate, differences in style, who talked over who, promises about health versus record on health, promises about gardai etc. etc. etc. Think it was much of a muchness. The thing that stood out for a few people I know, even those canvassing for FG and staunch Enda fans, was the whole 'I've got my best team/my justice spokesman got his stats wrong' admission. Even if he said Jim O'Keeffe was correct, he would have got a slap on the wrist from a few newpapers the day after. It was a glaring error, I was surprised Bertie didn't leap across the table when he heard it. Charlie and Albert would have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭kevmy


    DMC wrote:
    And for that reason, personally, the impression I get is that Labour and Pat Rabbitte would walk all over him in government (unless FG get more than 60 seats.)

    Thats rich considering McDowell and the rest of the PD's have essentially set the agenda for this government with 8 TD's and a couple of half-breeds (Cullen, Brennan). Co-location, Bertie Bowl, the airport, tax cuts for the rich.
    At least Labour would have some sort of mandate instead of the half-crazed, loonies that vote for the PD's


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    kevmy wrote:
    At least Labour would have some sort of mandate instead of the half-crazed, loonies that vote for the PD's

    Is that meant to be a serious point or a lapse into hysteria?

    You could have disagreed without reference to half breeds and suggestions that only the insane vote PD. It makes a nonsense out of any point you buried in the post.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    kevmy wrote:
    At least Labour would have some sort of mandate instead of the half-crazed, loonies that vote for the PD's

    Jaysus what is it about this election, I don't remember this level of crap for the last one.

    Take a weeks break for that outbreak.


Advertisement