Predictions for leaving cert.07

Cathy07

Hey every body, does any1 have any helpful predictions for this year??

Selphie

There's loads of threads relating to different subjects. Just check them out.

sternn

Off the stage, your a bit late

Rozabeez

No. No I do not have any predictions. Wait, wait I just got one....you're going to fail maths.

Sorry, its what the gods have told me.

Steve01

Honours Irish: An Chéad Drama and An t-Oileán are BOUND to come up
English: My gut feeling says literary genre and Michael Longley will appear
History: Something on the Ice Age

Apparently if you show up 10 minutes late for the exam you get 10 extra points...

lemansky

Steve01 wrote:

Honours Irish: An Chéad Drama and An t-Oileán are BOUND to come up
English: My gut feeling says literary genre and Michael Longley will appear
History: Something on the Ice Age

Apparently if you show up 10 minutes late for the exam you get 10 extra points...

cson

At the risk of repeating myself.....I predict a riot.

sternn

Steve01 wrote:

Honours Irish: An Chéad Drama and An t-Oileán are BOUND to come up
English: My gut feeling says literary genre and Michael Longley will appear
History: Something on the Ice Age

Apparently if you show up 10 minutes late for the exam you get 10 extra points...

I also heard that if you write your number correctly you get 5 points more...

And placing a €50 note apparently can influence the marker slightly..

qz

Steve01 wrote:

Honours Irish: An Chéad Drama and An t-Oileán are BOUND to come up
English: My gut feeling says literary genre and Michael Longley will appear
History: Something on the Ice Age

Apparently if you show up 10 minutes late for the exam you get 10 extra points...

lolz.

There's a bonus from this year on aswell for those doing the exams through Polish, what with all the EU expansion. Seriosuly.

cocoa

Steve01 wrote:

English: My gut feeling says literary genre and Michael Longley will appear

wow, I'd say you could make some amazing money out of those predictions with a bookie, the odds are pretty steep against considering neither is on the course this year...

md99

cocoa wrote:

wow, I'd say you could make some amazing money out of those predictions with a bookie, the odds are pretty steep against considering neither is on the course this year...

He was being sarcastic...........................

lemansky

cocoa wrote:

wow, I'd say you could make some amazing money out of those predictions with a bookie, the odds are pretty steep against considering neither is on the course this year...

aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh

ZorbaTehZ

cocoa wrote:

wow, I'd say you could make some amazing money out of those predictions with a bookie, the odds are pretty steep against considering neither is on the course this year...

I remember having quite a heated argument with someone on these boards back in October - some poor fool was insisting that Micheal Longley was on this years course. Goes to show just how ignorant some people can be.

Nehpets

Shush you! Go shine yer shoes! arrrrrrrrrgh

ZorbaTehZ

Nehpets wrote:

Shush you! Go shine yer shoes! arrrrrrrrrgh

lal, 'twas you?
*points and laughs*

Rozabeez

/me kicks dust on teh shoooooez.

md99

ZorbaTehZ wrote:

I remember having quite a heated argument with someone on these boards back in October - some poor fool was insisting that Micheal Longley was on this years course. Goes to show just how ignorant some people can be.

As ignorant as those who don't even read a message properly and jump to stupid conclusions? Steve01s post (about Longley) was NOT SERIOUS.....

ZorbaTehZ

md99 wrote:

As ignorant as those who don't even read a message properly and jump to stupid conclusions? Steve01s post (about Longley) was NOT SERIOUS.....

I realise that and thanks for pointing it out for the second time.

The focus of this thread shifted when I posted that remark. Is it really that difficult to understand? Or maybe it's that you just like flaming people (I'm feeling a distinct deja vu about this RE a thread where you jumped to conclusions and started flaming me.) I saw Michael Longley; I was reminded of that argument I had; comprende?

md99

ZorbaTehZ wrote:

I realise that and thanks for pointing it out for the second time.

The focus of this thread shifted when I posted that remark. Is it really that difficult to understand? Or maybe it's that you just like flaming people (I'm feeling a distinct deja vu about this RE a thread where you jumped to conclusions and started flaming me.)

lol, it's not that, i'm just really impatient, exam stress and all you know how t'is

I wasnt trying to flame you bout the Macbeth Q... fact is it's a 60 mark Q, not 100.... that's all there is to it.

justbringit89

List What Topics You Want 2 know about??