Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

XP bootup times

  • 26-05-2007 11:23pm
    #1
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭


    After building a PC in work yesterday which booted a clean install of XP Professional in 8 seconds (yes, 8!) it made me wonder, what makes XP boot up slower on other machines? My laptop takes 4 times as long as that. The machine consisted of:

    Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (clocked at 2.6GHz)
    Asus M2N4 SLI motherboard (nForce chipset, NF4 me thinks)
    2GB DDR2-800, I think it was CL5
    500GB Samsung HD501LJ Serial ATA/300 hard disk
    256MB GeForce 7600GS PCIe

    What would have been the contributing factor to such a fast starting time? Makes me want to look at a new setup hehe.


Comments

  • #2
    8T8
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,757 ✭✭✭8T8


    Faster CPU & HD plus RAM are the obvious answers but the fact nothing has been installed on the OS also contributes.

    As more and more software is loaded onto the machine that may have background services or require things to load on startup it will affect the boot up time. On a well maintained system the effect will be negligible but on a poorly kept one it can adversely effect the boot time. 2GB of RAM is generally the sweep spot for XP as well & helps a lot.

    The laptop obviously has a slower HD to begin with so the best you can if you want to speed it up is to remove any software you really don't need anymore, do a defrag of the HD and check the startup section in msconfig to see what is loading and prune unnecessary entries. A RAM upgrade would also help quite a bit as well especially if the system has only 512MB in it.


  • #3
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Well even a clean install on my machine isn't that quick! It's a 2.0GHz Pentium M with 1.5GB DDR2-533 and a 160GB 5400rpm ATA100 drive. It just amazed me because I *never* saw anything start Windows that quickly.


  • #4
    humaxf1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 865 ✭✭✭humaxf1


    does 8 seconds include the POST, motherboard logo etc etc and desktop fully loaded, ie no egg timer?

    A good idea is to turn off the XP bloat look and switch to windows classic theme.


  • #5
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    No, 8 seconds from when NTLDR starts. This machine was a new build, still had the XP themes and everything. I don't mess with too many settings before sending it out, it's not mine to play with!


  • #6
    mukki
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭mukki


    humaxf1 wrote:
    does 8 seconds include the POST, motherboard logo etc etc and desktop fully loaded, ie no egg timer?

    A good idea is to turn off the XP bloat look and switch to windows classic theme.

    eugh, install the "royal theme" instead, looks lovely, worth waiting for

    op had you all the hardware set up, thinks like usb cd-roms realy delay the boot time


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    mukki wrote:
    eugh, install the "royal theme" instead, looks lovely, worth waiting for

    op had you all the hardware set up, thinks like usb cd-roms realy delay the boot time
    I think Vista looks awful in the Windows 2000 scheme, it just doesn't suit it. Though the MCE Royale is quite nice.

    The only drivers I had installed were the nForce chipset, HD Audio (I think ADI SoundMax) and the graphics. Enough to eliminate all of the unknown devices in Device Manager. One thing which stuck out was that the entire machine was Serial ATA only (including the DVD-RW), no IDE devices.


Advertisement