Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Differentiation question

Options
  • 28-05-2007 10:38am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭


    hey im having some trouble differentiating (1-logeX)^2 {one minus log x to the base e squared}... i keep gettin -2/x but according to the answers in my book when i let dy/dx=0 x turns out to be e but i get -2.... any help pleease :(


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 107 ✭✭seandoiler


    y = (1 - ln[x])^2
    dy/dx = 2 * (1 - ln[x]) * (-1/x) ............chain rule
    so dy/dx = - 2 (1-ln[x]) / x
    dy/dx=0 => -2 + 2 ln[x] = 0 => x=e


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭Steoob


    o right... ya for some reason i put the -2 over x and the lnx over x and took that as ln(x/x) which is one hence ln1=0...

    thanks very much this was annoying the **** out of me


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 348 ✭✭analyse this


    seandoiler wrote:
    y = (1 - ln[x])^2
    dy/dx = 2 * (1 - ln[x]) * (-1/x) ............chain rule
    so dy/dx = - 2 (1-ln[x]) / x
    dy/dx=0 => -2 + 2 ln[x] = 0 => x=e

    You lost me there mate! Care to explain?:o

    why is dy/dx=0?? and why does x=e?:o


  • Registered Users Posts: 107 ✭✭seandoiler


    well he said in his original post that he has to solve dy/dx =0, well he doesn't say it explicitly but rather implies it.....at any rate if you take dy/dx =0, you get -2 + 2 ln[x] =0, which gives 2 = 2 ln [x] => 1=ln[x] => e=x, this okay?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭Steoob


    i needed to find out where the there was a stationary point or something.. i cant really remember but i had to put dy/dx=0 to find x


  • Advertisement
Advertisement